Missouri: Governor Nixon Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Missouri: Governor Nixon Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

This is a discussion on Missouri: Governor Nixon Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Last Friday, Governor Jay Nixon (D) signed into law House Bill 533, critical self-defense legislation. Sponsored by state Representative Jeanie Riddle (R-49) and state Senator ...

Results 1 to 11 of 11
Like Tree10Likes
  • 5 Post By Patti
  • 1 Post By Stoveman
  • 3 Post By TX expat
  • 1 Post By TX expat

Thread: Missouri: Governor Nixon Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Patti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Show Me State
    Posts
    2,734

    Missouri: Governor Nixon Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

    Last Friday, Governor Jay Nixon (D) signed into law House Bill 533, critical self-defense legislation. Sponsored by state Representative Jeanie Riddle (R-49) and state Senator Brian Munzlinger (R-18), this new law will protect the right of a state employee to store a firearm in his or her private vehicle on state property as long as the vehicle is locked and the firearm is not visible. Additionally, it will prohibit any government entity from using tax dollars to participate in a gun “buyback” program unless the firearms are resold or transferred to a federally licensed firearms dealer. This law will take effect on August 28, 2013.

    House Bill 533 passed by overwhelming majorities in both legislative chambers, and many thanks go to those elected officials who voted in support of state employees having the right to keep a firearm locked in their vehicle while at work so that they may provide for their self-defense when commuting to and from work. Please contact Republican state Representative Jeannie Riddle, state Republican Senator Brian Munzlinger to express your appreciation for their work and support to strengthen your inherent right to self-defense.

    Missouri House of Representatives

    Representative Jeanie Riddle

    Senator Brian Munzlinger
    Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. — Winston Churchill


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array Stoveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cuba on the Chesapeake
    Posts
    3,279
    blitzburgh likes this.

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array Doghandler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Branch
    Posts
    2,324
    That pretty close to home. What comes around goes around. Good job, neighbors!
    There is a solution but we are not Jedi... not yet.
    Doghandler

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array 357and40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    2,484
    Wow, Jay Nixon finally did something right...
    "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain."
    - Roy Batty

  5. #5
    VIP Member Array SmokinFool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,297
    Good to see legislators actually representing their constituents for a change.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array CanuckQue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Maritimes Canada
    Posts
    1,173
    May I ask a question about the buy back condition? I've seen this push more than once, and I'm curious as to why it's seen as so important. Firstly, who cares if the gun is destroyed? Why is that important enough to legislate? As well, since buybacks are usually "no questions asked" (right?), who will ensure that the dealer is not receiving a firearm that was previously used in a crime?
    The only acceptable long-term outcome is to find a cure. It's an actual solution, requiring forward-thinking efforts.

    Until then, we're just arguing about who's pushing who.


  7. #7
    VIP Member
    Array TX expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    4,097
    Quote Originally Posted by CanuckQue View Post
    May I ask a question about the buy back condition? I've seen this push more than once, and I'm curious as to why it's seen as so important. Firstly, who cares if the gun is destroyed? Why is that important enough to legislate? As well, since buybacks are usually "no questions asked" (right?), who will ensure that the dealer is not receiving a firearm that was previously used in a crime?
    Because it basically stops the government from using our tax dollars to buy something with the sole purpose of destroying it; that's wasting money and there's no legitimate reason that the weapon cannot be brought back into the "legal" market. The authorities check to be sure that the gun isn't stolen, but to the best of my knowledge they are checked for ballistic matches against guns used in crimes as that would be cost prohibitive. It's fairly irrelevant if the firearm was used in a crime before it was resold to the dealer. If it had been used in a crime, it still has a legal paper trail that takes places after that crime, so it's not like the new owners will get accused of an act that took place before they had possession of the firearm.
    tony1990, joker1 and Tzadik like this.
    NRA Life Member

    "I don't believe gun owners have rights." - Sarah Brady

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array CanuckQue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Maritimes Canada
    Posts
    1,173
    Quote Originally Posted by TX expat View Post
    If it had been used in a crime, it still has a legal paper trail that takes places after that crime, so it's not like the new owners will get accused of an act that took place before they had possession of the firearm.
    Yeah, duh, brainfart on my part. You're obviously correct. As long as there's a papertrail, I guess.
    Is the reasoning mostly "buying something to destroy it is just a waste of money"?
    The only acceptable long-term outcome is to find a cure. It's an actual solution, requiring forward-thinking efforts.

    Until then, we're just arguing about who's pushing who.


  9. #9
    VIP Member
    Array TX expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    4,097
    Quote Originally Posted by CanuckQue View Post
    Yeah, duh, brainfart on my part. You're obviously correct. As long as there's a papertrail, I guess.
    Is the reasoning mostly "buying something to destroy it is just a waste of money"?
    Yes, basically. It prevents the state from declaring a war on "firearms" with tax dollars. They can declare a war on illegal firearms, but they cannot turn around and destroy that property simply because they want to keep people from owning firearms. They can reintroduce those items back into the legal realm, but they can't destroy them simply to destroy them.
    joker1 likes this.
    NRA Life Member

    "I don't believe gun owners have rights." - Sarah Brady

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array digitalexplr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Jefferson City, MO
    Posts
    914
    Jeanne and Brian are two of the most dedicated 2nd Amendment supporters you could ever want. They not only "talk the talk", they "walk the walk". They are fantastic individuals to know. They are also two examples of why term limits really suck!
    NRA Life Member

  11. #11
    Member Array bigb360's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    31
    Mo resident here. Nixon signed this bill to pander to the gun rights crowd after having vetoed the much stronger and better hb 436 that weird have nullified federal law. Don't be fooled, Nixon is an enemy of the second amendment.

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

august 28 2014 new bill gets signed into law in missouri

,

missouri august 28 2013 ccw laws

,

mo gun law goes into effect aug 28

,

new law in missouri on ccw august 28, 2013

,

self defense missouri

Click on a term to search for related topics.