This is a discussion on Be sure to vote in this 2A poll within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Amend the 2nd Amendment? Who should bear arms?...
Glad these totalitarian imbeciles are getting embarrassed.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." C.S. Lewis
Amending the Constitution is not a good idea right now.
They would 'need to pass them in order to know what was put into them', look at the mess they make of our laws today.
We can't trust any of our politicians right now. None! Nata! Zero! We must get some trust worthy people in there first, if there are any left in the USA.
LEARN something today so you can TEACH something tomorrow.Dominus Vobiscum <))>(Where is the wisdom that we have lost in knowledge?" T.S. Elliot
So, government "security" entities are necessary to the security of a free state and protecting the rights of citizens. But, further, only while serving in a government capacity in said organizations shall the RKBA of each citizen not be infringed. Utter liberty-hating BS, right there.Originally Posted by From the article, proposed new 2A
I'll take "the RKBA shall not be infringed," myself. Much more concrete, less apt to be completely abused and misconstrued. As plain as that language is in the actual, existing 2A, it's still unconstitutionally abused by these destroyers.
Myself, I'd almost accept one change, if it could be done: "You screw with the right of any citizen to arm himself to the degree he wishes, you die by fire and get fined out of existence." ... or, an at least reasonable alternative to that, putting actual teeth into the protection, something that'll be absolute and inescapable for these destroyers.
Wow, 3000+ rejections and 250 accepts!! Quite a clear message there!!
92.6% rejections. I think that answers the poll.
Retired USAF E-8. Remember: You're being watched!
Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield
Only brown shirts should have veapons?
Yeah, I got tapatalk, too. So what?
It could be worse!
Pure crap. Nuff said...Because a well-regulated National Guard and Reserve, and well-regulated Federal, state, and local public safety departments, are necessary to the security of our free states and our free nation, the rights of citizens, while serving in their capacity in the aforesaid organizations, to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Don"t let stupid be your skill set....
Either the site is getting a whole bunch of "hits" or they don't like the responses they are getting and are "slowing" things down, because I tried 4 times before I was finally able to get to the site, then after I voted, it froze my computer without coming back with the results! I had to hit CTL-ALT-DEL to get out, then totally restart explorer and sign back in again here! Don't know what the latest count is and don't intend to go back there again and freeze things up again!
Live to ride, ride to live. Harley Road King And keep a .45 handy Kimber Custom TLE II
As BUGS BUNNY used to say "WHAT A MA ROON !!!"
Interesting contradiction they don't want you as a citizen to have a gun. However I bet they see nothing wrong with drafting you giving you a gun and telling you who to kill.
The people have spoken...and continue to speak: the right to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed!
S&W M&P Full Size 9mm - Little FoxX IWB
S&W Shield 9mm - FoxX Trapp
Ruger 10/22 Takedown
NRA Life Member/GOA Life Member
Don't let the high post count fool you...I'm just part of the welcoming committee.
they will ignore the rejections.
Anyone who seriously proposes an amendment like that should be escorted out to the nearest dumpster and squared away immediately.
I rejected this crap. Here are the current stats as of my vote.
Approve 330 (6.6%)
Reject 4661 (93.4%)
Total votes = 4991
"Everybody gets knocked down in life. How you choose to get back up is up to you!"