Idea: anonymous "Defensive Gun Use" web database

Idea: anonymous "Defensive Gun Use" web database

This is a discussion on Idea: anonymous "Defensive Gun Use" web database within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; A few hours ago, I had my first (and hopefully, my only) "defensive gun use"; no shots were fired, and no one was hurt, but ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Str8upguy
  • 1 Post By ksholder

Thread: Idea: anonymous "Defensive Gun Use" web database

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array RicT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    607

    Idea: anonymous "Defensive Gun Use" web database

    A few hours ago, I had my first (and hopefully, my only) "defensive gun use"; no shots were fired, and no one was hurt, but I did have to draw/show my weapon to prevent some life-threatening violence against me. That's all I'm going to say about the matter right now, but it got me to thinking...

    The anti-gun crowd make light of the "defensive gun use" numbers, partly because the actual reported numbers are fairly low. And the numbers are fairly low because, if no shots were fired, people who conceal carry are reluctant to report the incident, for all kinds of reasons. So, what if we had an anonymous website/database where people who have had a defensive gun use, regardless of shots fired or not, could add their specific experience, which could then be used to present some "real" numbers on these incidents?

    I'm not any kind of website expert, so I'm not sure how the anonymous nature of the postings could be assured, but I would imagine that Tor and anonymizer web services could be used...

    We (Second Amendment rights promoters) would have to publicize the website so that it could actually capture the large number of "not-police-reported" incidents, but I'm guessing that forums such as this could do that easily.

    What do you think?


  2. #2
    Distinguished Member
    Array Str8upguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,356
    I would assume that anything posted on the internet is traceable. While it would be a nice idea, the wish for being anonymous doesn't exist anymore. The website would be a feeding ground for the authorities looking for information, just like this one is. good luck
    niks likes this.
    Don't let the facts cloud your judgement.
    Bad luck has perfect timing Joe "the donster" deBunker
    Who you are speaks so loudly I can't hear what you're saying...Ralph Waldon Emerson
    NRA Member

  3. #3
    VIP Member
    Array ksholder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,940
    If it were truly anonymous, I would question its reliability.
    ccw9mm likes this.
    It's the Land of Opportunity, not the Land of Entitlements - Vote America!!!

    "When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny." Thomas Jefferson

    You are only paranoid until you are right - then you are a visionary.

  4. #4
    VIP Member
    Array msgt/ret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,365
    The NRA has a website with a compilation of stories of defensive firearms use.

    NRA-ILA | Armed Citizen
    When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
    "Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."

  5. #5
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27,003
    Imagine if truly anonymous. No IP address tracked, no logfile entries, no identifying characteristics of the person or location or situation, except for basic categorized factors about the incident (ie, male/female, solo or with others, single/multiple assailants, time of day, date, type of location [shop, street, businesses], and so on). Imagine, then, that folks began to use it to "document" spurious incidents for purposes of skewing the results. Unless basically run down for details, it'd be hard to take the results as meaningful indicators.

    The FBI stats are pretty good, for what they are. Trouble is, they don't (can't) capture situations that go unreported, and they often don't include numbers in the categories you think they do. Stats for some other countries can be even worse, with known instances of deliberate skewing of numbers for political purposes. No telling how much skewing of results for similar purposes is done in the USA, either at the county/state level or the fed/reporting level.

    For my money, I'd say about as good as we're likely to get is: (a) the FBI and CDC stats regarding incidents and injuries/deaths; and the NRA type sites documenting key defensive situations reported to them. Basically the unreported situations won't ever be on any of these lists anyway.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors