February 9th, 2005 01:58 AM
Somebody Please Think of the Children!
Please Think of the Children
I see some stupid crap but this takes the taco.
Have you seen this thing?
I have never seen such a level of hype and politically biased crap in my life time.
According to this report, 2867 children died of gunfire in 2002.
1830 were homicide victims.
828 committed suicide
209 died in accidents.
Okay first of all, I checked the Centers for Disease Control website. I pulled up a chart that shows the top 10 causes of death by age categories. All sexes and races were included.
Adding it all up, according to the CDC, in 2002 there were a total of
423 homicides where the victims were ages 1-4
140 homicides where the victims were ages 5-9
216 homicides where the victims were ages 10-14
Thatís a total of 779 homicides with absolutely no indication of the weapon used. Even if firearms accounted for 100% of these homicides, and odds are firearms were the weapons used for a fraction of these homicides, thatís less than half of what the Childrens Defense Fund reports.
Also, the CDC does list Suicide as the #3 cause of death for ages 10-14 with 260 victims. Once again, even if firearms did account for 100% of these suicides, thatís still less than 33% of what the Childrenís Defense Fund report states. Suicide doesnít even show up in the top ten causes of death for the younger categories.
Then they go on about what percent was of each ethnicity. Who the hell cares? If we want to protect children, letís protect children and not be bigots.
Then they list off that 416 of their victims as being under 15, which doesnít mesh with the CDC numbers either. Also, if 416 of their victims are under 15, 1414 are over 15. How old could they be? 17? 18? 20? Arenít 18 year olds adults? The Childrenís Defense Fund doesnít say. Did they rake in some 25 year olds to pad their numbers? I mean come on even a 36 year old woman with a 12 year old son of her own is someoneís child after all.
Then they claim as many as 5 times as many children were injured but not killed. Okay thatís roughly 9000 injuries maximum according to their numbers. Letís look at the CDC info again. Hey look, roughly 5500 kids 15 and under were KILLED and I stress KILLED and not injured in accidents.
How many thousands upon thousands of accidents are there per year involving children?
Arenít children prone to accidents? I mean come on itís safe to let a 6 year old wander around freely, right?
How many of these accidents involve a firearm? Who can say? Even if you go with the Childrenís Defense Fund numbers, they donít mean anything. If 9000 kids are injured in gun accidents, how many are injured in car wrecks? Heck how many fall down the stairs?
Then on page 2 they list off a bunch of statistics I wonít hash though because they probably donít hold water either and they never say how old a ďteenagerĒ is. They are also obsessed with comparing Blacks to Whites.
Then thereís this little blurb about how Clinton allowed the so called ďAssault Weapons BanĒ to expire and how these weapons are designed to slay legions of children in a matter of seconds.
Dear God in Heaven thatís the most ignorant, politically driven statement I think Iíve ever seen. All that ban did was prevent lawful gun owners from installing accessories which make for safer shooting.
First of all no one without a very expensive and hard to get license has had access to an ďAssault WeaponĒ since the 1930ís.
Look at this. Itís short colorful and informative.
Page 3 I wonít comment on. The numbers on page 1 donít match, so why bother to even check the others?
Then on page 4 thereís this little check list.
1. Support reasonable gun control measures Ė Like what? Banning all hunting rifles? That seems reasonable because obviously if we ban those bad assault rifles then theyíll just use hunting rifles instead. Because thatís what hunting rifles are for. Hunting Children.
2. Remove guns from your home Ė I donít f###ing think so. When the serial pedophile/child killer comes in the middle of the night to take chop up my defenseless 6 year old daughter with an axe, daddyís going to be standing there with a 12 gauge.
3. Point #3 basically says guns enable violence. Yeah and personal responsibility has nothing to do with it. Get rid of the guns and suddenly people will stop beating their wives. Of course. Itís brilliant.
4. Four recommends some hippy book for children to master. Iíll stick to the Bible thank you. It will still be here in 1000 years and your flavor of the month psychology wonít be.
5. Donít let your children see violent materials Ė Well this is a parentís choice. I agree that you must be careful what you expose your children to, but you know what I grew up watching Rambo and GI Joe and playing DOOM and Iíve never shot anybody. I even own one of those bad assault weapons that kill thousands of children instantly.
6. Help focus the public on child gun deaths. Yes letís not mourn the loss of a child, letís harp on how itís the gunís fault. You gotta watch those guns. Theyíll jump right out at ya.
7. Meaningless dribble that has nothing to do with defending children.
8. I think I might actually agree with this one. Yes, I do agree with point 8 except for the fact that ILLEGAL gun dealers are the only kind open to children.
The rest of page 5 is comparing different colors of people again. Why is the Childrenís Defense fund so hung up on this? Are White or Black children more valuable or something?
Oh page 6 is great. California and the District of Colombia have increased homicide/suicide/accident rates involving firearms it seems.
All firearms are banned in the District of Colombia. California has insanely strict gun control laws. See? I can jump to conclusions too. Thereís no pattern, rhyme or reason to this table.
On page 7 they vilify the idea of a child actually having their own real gun.
Letís not ever teach children gun safety!
Letís never teach them personal responsibility!
I should let all the safety skills I have ever learned just go away. What am I thinking buying junior a .22 for his 11th birthday?
Oh wait. I still have a Marlin Model 60 I got when I was 10. Other than a scratch on the stock it looks brand new, because someone who cared about me taught me it was not a toy but a tool to be taken care of and used properly.
By the way, it holds 14 rounds in the magazine and it is a semiautomatic rifle just like those so called assault weapons. I had access to a real high capacity, rapid firing rifle designed to kill thousands of children instantly at the age of 11 and I was even taught exactly how to operate and maintain it.
By the age of 14 I had a real 12 gauge shotgun that seemed as long as I was tall. And it also looks like itís brand new.
Then there are some newspaper clippings and a picture which offer no hard information at all, not even misleading information, but they do appeal to your emotions. Yeah emotional sentiment is a great way to make a logical argument.
This crap makes me sick.
Itís not parentís faults or anyoneís fault that bad things happen to children, itís those darn guns. The conflicting numbers, illogical conclusions, focus on racial differences, and propaganda tactics tell the whole story.
February 9th, 2005 06:46 AM
Wait do you mean you actual
1 Thought there aurgument would make sense
2 wasted time of your life youll never get back reading that drivel
February 9th, 2005 05:23 PM
It's like a train wreck Bud.
You don't want to stare but you can't look away.
Besides, if I don't examine my enemy's argument, how can I know that mine is correct?
February 9th, 2005 11:57 PM
I agree but would say it a little differently.... It is very worthwhile reading to see what we are up against, I don't really need to read theirs to know my argument is correct. I was listening to my daily (conservative) talk show on my way home from work the other day and someone was giving the host a lot of crap over him allowing a caller to spout some diatribe that was full of lies. The guy host came back with, "I want these people to be able to say these things so the whole country can see how out of touch and crazy they are in their thinking." This applies here, although there are a number of people that will buy into all of these "statistics". :eviltongu
Originally Posted by Euclidean
Coimhťad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.
February 10th, 2005 12:08 PM
We just have to keep up the good fight. There are differing opinions to all sides, and a nut job for every cause, we just have to be vigilant about our rights. :smily1094
By DaveH in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: May 27th, 2010, 12:29 AM
By jtmoose in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: February 8th, 2009, 12:48 AM
By jmm076 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: April 15th, 2008, 08:32 AM
By Danger Mouse in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: March 16th, 2008, 02:52 PM
By 4my sons in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Last Post: August 30th, 2006, 03:13 PM
Search tags for this page
please think of the children gun control
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors