They are a sad, sad people
This is a discussion on They are a sad, sad people within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Got this in my Yahoo acct...I sent these idiots an e-mail (I was in a fightin' mood one day, and they published something glaringly stupid...I ...
April 12th, 2007 11:06 PM
They are a sad, sad people
Got this in my Yahoo acct...I sent these idiots an e-mail (I was in a fightin' mood one day, and they published something glaringly stupid...I knew it was a waste of time, but I felt better sending them a nasty note)...so here we are....try not to get your blood pressure up--just know what they intend to do next....The Brady Bunch
I'm simply aghast!
In a 2-1 decision in Parker v. District of Columbia, right-wing activist judges [ vs the left wingers you LOVE] on a Federal Appeals Court recently overturned Washington D.C.'s long-standing restrictions on handguns based on their twisted view of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution while ignoring more than 60 years of precedent — a decision that endangers America's gun laws coast-to-coast. [because precedent, not principle is how we should live our lives....]
This case could land before the U.S. Supreme Court within the next 6 months and each month brings a tidal wave of work to fight this terrible decision [for criminals and people who wet their pants over the mere thought of a tool used for self-defense]. Simply put: we need your support today! [the he!! you do]
Please click here to make a commitment of $5 or more per month. This affordable amount will automatically be charged to your credit card each month — unless you decide to change or cancel your monthly commitment. [how about a spanking?]
Your monthly gift will be a steady source of income that will help us:
Convene well-recognized experts in constitutional law and history to develop the most powerful arguments against the Parker ruling;
Assemble a comprehensive library of books, treatises, articles, court decisions and legal briefs [I guess actual facts are completely out of the realm of possibility then?] refuting the "individual rights" view of the Second Amendment [yeah...and while you are at it, take a look at that whole 1st Amendment thing and see if it applies to computers and the internet...since you aren't technically "speaking"] and make this library available to lawyers nationwide and on the Internet; and
Launch a major public education campaign [what, praytell, will you be "teaching"? Roll over and die? Belief in gov't sponsored prayer (911)] including full-page ads in major newspapers and a new Brady Gun Law Defense Fund website. We'll also organize lawyers and law professors to write newspaper op-eds and letters to the editor to create a constant drumbeat of criticism of this decision. [crybaby]
This battle — to its very core — is the most important battle we have ever waged. We need your help today — your monthly support — to build a strong Brady Gun Law Defense Fund to save America's gun laws. [uh...like the ones you broke when you bought your son a RIFLE!?--hypocrite....how about saving the American people from criminals and teaching them to take personal responsibility and defend themselves?...then teach criminals it is hazardous to their health and very being to commit crimes]
This fight is so critical to the safety and sanity of our nation that an anonymous donor has extended his challenge and will match dollar for dollar all monthly gifts to our Brady Gun Law Defense Fund. [lemme guess....his name rhymes with Soros?]
So your $5 monthly gift is worth $10, your $25 monthly gift is worth $50! [really? maybe I should contact my mortgage company and see if they have this kind of a good deal too! The savings will towards a new AR-15 clone and ammo]
We must prepare for the fight of our lives [I AM!....I shoot as much as I can!...please send me money for ammo]. Everything we have worked for in the past and everything we’re currently working on could be destroyed by the heinous ruling of right-wing activist judges [YAY!!!!] who choose to ignore more than 60 years of precedent [see above you twit] in order to help the gun lobby [do they really lobby for guns or for Constitutional law be upheld...what part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?] accomplish in the courts what they’ve been unable to accomplish in Congress. [Why? Does the 2nd Amendment need help from Congress or protection from them?]
Please respond today. Thank you. [Bite me]
Sarah Brady, Chair
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
Accomplished Violator of Gun Laws
April 12th, 2007 11:06 PM
April 12th, 2007 11:38 PM
Sad Is An Understatement...
It is hard to comprehend how people believe all the crap that they spew...
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
April 13th, 2007 10:43 AM
On the bright side. She sounds scared. That's good.
...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller
April 13th, 2007 09:26 PM
"Help us make you defenseless". That would make a great tag line for their drivel.
The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD
April 13th, 2007 11:08 PM
They're right. This is critical, sending an extra check to NRA 1st thing in AM. Should that go to general fund or PAC?
By Timor in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: July 1st, 2008, 06:08 PM
By sgtD in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
Last Post: February 13th, 2007, 08:37 PM
By JPP in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
Last Post: February 4th, 2007, 11:56 PM