I'm sure most if not all of you are witnessing the beginnings of the fallout of this horrific tragedy: well intentioned, but grossly misguided individuals starting to post their calls for stricter gun laws since they reason that tougher access to guns would have made VT safe by reducing and/or eliminating the killer access to the weapons he used.
We here all know that to be a fallacy.
I implore you to let your voices be heard; but in a respectful and mindful manner as this hue and cry is in the aftermath of tragedy.
I posted this on two sites (I did make a minor change in my second posting of this message which was on the NY Times blog section....they haven't posted it yet...no surprise there):
Again, post and be active; if we pro-gunners act now as we did when Zumbo posted his anti-AR/AK messages a month back, then they'll be no mistaking our united position.
We here all know that to be a fallacy.
I implore you to let your voices be heard; but in a respectful and mindful manner as this hue and cry is in the aftermath of tragedy.
I posted this on two sites (I did make a minor change in my second posting of this message which was on the NY Times blog section....they haven't posted it yet...no surprise there):
If you do choose to post, please run a spell check, don't use UPPER CASE, and for the Lord's Sake, don't curse or come across as a Neanderthal. The anti-gun side thinks we are all knuckle-draggers; no need to prove their (foolish) point.
Again, post and be active; if we pro-gunners act now as we did when Zumbo posted his anti-AR/AK messages a month back, then they'll be no mistaking our united position.