Wanted: A culture of self-defense

This is a discussion on Wanted: A culture of self-defense within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Wanted: A culture of self-defense By Michelle Malkin Wednesday, April 18, 2007 Link There's no polite way or time to say it: American colleges and ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Wanted: A culture of self-defense

  1. #1
    JT [OP]
    JT is offline
    Distinguished Member Array JT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,425

    Wanted: A culture of self-defense

    Wanted: A culture of self-defense
    By Michelle Malkin
    Wednesday, April 18, 2007
    Link

    There's no polite way or time to say it: American colleges and universities have become coddle industries. Big Nanny administrators oversee speech codes, segregated dorms, politically correct academic departments and designated "safe spaces" to protect students selectively from hurtful (conservative) opinions -- while allowing mob rule for approved leftist positions (textbook case: Columbia University's anti-Minuteman Project protesters).

    Instead of teaching students to defend their beliefs, American educators shield them from vigorous intellectual debate. Instead of encouraging autonomy, our higher institutions of learning stoke passivity and conflict-avoidance.

    And as the erosion of intellectual self-defense goes, so goes the erosion of physical self-defense.

    Yesterday morning, as news was breaking about the carnage at Virginia Tech, a reader e-mailed me a news story from last January. State legislators in Virginia had attempted to pass a bill that would have eased handgun restrictions on college campuses. Opposed by outspoken, anti-gun activists and Virginia Tech administrators, that bill failed.

    Is it too early to ask: "What if?" What if that bill had passed? What if just one student in one of those classrooms had been in lawful possession of a concealed weapon for the purpose of self-defense?

    If it wasn't too early for Keystone Katie Couric to be jumping all over campus security yesterday for what they woulda/coulda/shoulda done in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and if it isn't too early for The New York Times editorial board to be publishing its knee-jerk call for more gun control, it darned well isn't too early for me to raise questions about how the unrepentant anti-gun lobbying of college officials may have put students at risk.

    The back story: Virginia Tech had punished a student for bringing a handgun to class last spring -- despite the fact that the student had a valid concealed handgun permit. The bill would have barred public universities from making "rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit . . . from lawfully carrying a concealed handgun." After the proposal died in subcommittee, the school's governing board reiterated its ban on students or employees carrying guns and prohibiting visitors from bringing them into campus buildings.

    Late last summer, a shooting near campus prompted students to clamor again for loosening campus rules against armed self-defense. Virginia Tech officials turned up their noses. In response to student Bradford Wiles's campus newspaper op-ed piece in support of concealed carry on campus, Virginia Tech Associate Vice President Larry Hincker scoffed:

    "[I]t is absolutely mind-boggling to see the opinions of Bradford Wiles. . . . The editors of this page must have printed this commentary if for no other reason than malicious compliance. Surely, they scratched their heads saying, 'I can't believe he really wants to say that.' Wiles tells us that he didn't feel safe with the hundreds of highly trained officers armed with high powered rifles encircling the building and protecting him. He even implies that he needed his sidearm to protect himself . . ."

    The nerve!

    Hincker continued: "The writer would have us believe that a university campus, with tens of thousands of young people, is safer with everyone packing heat. Imagine the continual fear of students in that scenario. We've seen that fear here, and we don't want to see it again. . . . Guns don't belong in classrooms. They never will. Virginia Tech has a very sound policy preventing same."

    Who's scratching his head now, Mr. Hincker?

    Some high-handed commentators insist it's premature or unseemly to examine the impact of school rules discouraging students from carrying arms on campus. Pundit Andrew Sullivan complained that it was "creepy" to highlight reader e-mails calling attention to Virginia Tech's restrictions on student self-defense -- even as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence rushed to capitalize on the massacre to sign up new members and gather e-mail addresses for Million Mom March chapters. "We are outraged by the increase in gun violence in America, especially the recent shooting at Virginia Tech," reads the online petition. "Add your name to the growing list of people who are saying: 'Enough Is Enough!'"

    Enough is enough, indeed. Enough of intellectual disarmament. Enough of physical disarmament. You want a safer campus? It begins with renewing a culture of self-defense -- mind, spirit and body. It begins with two words: Fight back.
    Blessed be the Lord my rock who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1

    Si vis pacem, para bellum

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member
    Array Miggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Miami-Dade, FL
    Posts
    6,258
    You have to make the shot when fire is smoking, people are screaming, dogs are barking, kids are crying and sirens are coming.
    Randy Cain.

    Ego will kill you. Leave it at home.
    Signed: Me!

  4. #3
    Senior Moderator
    Array pgrass101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    13,073
    Can I get a Amen
    Sometimes I wonder who the old man in the mirror is....

    Lord, Grant me a good sword and no need to use it.

  5. #4
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,482
    Enough is enough, indeed. Enough of intellectual disarmament. Enough of physical disarmament.
    I would like to think we might see a sea change - but won't hold my breath.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  6. #5
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    21,361
    That being able to see a sea of change could turn into disaster depending on which way the tide ends up running (To follow the theme). That's the part that scares me.
    Rick

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array SatCong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,548
    Quote Originally Posted by JT View Post
    Wanted: A culture of self-defense
    By Michelle Malkin
    Wednesday, April 18, 2007
    Link

    There's no polite way or time to say it: American colleges and universities have become coddle industries. Big Nanny administrators oversee speech codes, segregated dorms, politically correct academic departments and designated "safe spaces" to protect students selectively from hurtful (conservative) opinions -- while allowing mob rule for approved leftist positions (textbook case: Columbia University's anti-Minuteman Project protesters).

    Instead of teaching students to defend their beliefs, American educators shield them from vigorous intellectual debate. Instead of encouraging autonomy, our higher institutions of learning stoke passivity and conflict-avoidance.

    And as the erosion of intellectual self-defense goes, so goes the erosion of physical self-defense.

    Yesterday morning, as news was breaking about the carnage at Virginia Tech, a reader e-mailed me a news story from last January. State legislators in Virginia had attempted to pass a bill that would have eased handgun restrictions on college campuses. Opposed by outspoken, anti-gun activists and Virginia Tech administrators, that bill failed.

    Is it too early to ask: "What if?" What if that bill had passed? What if just one student in one of those classrooms had been in lawful possession of a concealed weapon for the purpose of self-defense?

    If it wasn't too early for Keystone Katie Couric to be jumping all over campus security yesterday for what they woulda/coulda/shoulda done in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and if it isn't too early for The New York Times editorial board to be publishing its knee-jerk call for more gun control, it darned well isn't too early for me to raise questions about how the unrepentant anti-gun lobbying of college officials may have put students at risk.

    The back story: Virginia Tech had punished a student for bringing a handgun to class last spring -- despite the fact that the student had a valid concealed handgun permit. The bill would have barred public universities from making "rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit . . . from lawfully carrying a concealed handgun." After the proposal died in subcommittee, the school's governing board reiterated its ban on students or employees carrying guns and prohibiting visitors from bringing them into campus buildings.

    Late last summer, a shooting near campus prompted students to clamor again for loosening campus rules against armed self-defense. Virginia Tech officials turned up their noses. In response to student Bradford Wiles's campus newspaper op-ed piece in support of concealed carry on campus, Virginia Tech Associate Vice President Larry Hincker scoffed:

    "[I]t is absolutely mind-boggling to see the opinions of Bradford Wiles. . . . The editors of this page must have printed this commentary if for no other reason than malicious compliance. Surely, they scratched their heads saying, 'I can't believe he really wants to say that.' Wiles tells us that he didn't feel safe with the hundreds of highly trained officers armed with high powered rifles encircling the building and protecting him. He even implies that he needed his sidearm to protect himself . . ."

    The nerve!

    Hincker continued: "The writer would have us believe that a university campus, with tens of thousands of young people, is safer with everyone packing heat. Imagine the continual fear of students in that scenario. We've seen that fear here, and we don't want to see it again. . . . Guns don't belong in classrooms. They never will. Virginia Tech has a very sound policy preventing same."

    Who's scratching his head now, Mr. Hincker?

    Some high-handed commentators insist it's premature or unseemly to examine the impact of school rules discouraging students from carrying arms on campus. Pundit Andrew Sullivan complained that it was "creepy" to highlight reader e-mails calling attention to Virginia Tech's restrictions on student self-defense -- even as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence rushed to capitalize on the massacre to sign up new members and gather e-mail addresses for Million Mom March chapters. "We are outraged by the increase in gun violence in America, especially the recent shooting at Virginia Tech," reads the online petition. "Add your name to the growing list of people who are saying: 'Enough Is Enough!'"

    Enough is enough, indeed. Enough of intellectual disarmament. Enough of physical disarmament. You want a safer campus? It begins with renewing a culture of self-defense -- mind, spirit and body. It begins with two words: Fight back.
    Thankyou! Well put!

  8. #7
    Administrator
    Array SIXTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    19,350
    Nice post!


    I remember reading a book a few years back, it was called something like "The dumbing down of America". I thought it made some good points, but it was a little odd... at the time. I even echoed agreed thought of the author, but now it is coming to the surface for everyone to see. I think this might be a milestone of a new era, or will it be ignored and swept away like incidents in the past?
    "Just blame Sixto"

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array Cupcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,164
    And shes good lookin' too!
    Spend few minutes learning about my journey from Zero to Athlete in this mini documentary!
    Then check out my blog! www.BodyByMcDonalds.com

    Cupcake - 100 pound loser, adventurer, Ironman Triathlete.

  10. #9
    Distinguished Member Array 4my son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Out side of Richmond, VA
    Posts
    1,625
    Quote Originally Posted by pgrass101 View Post
    Can I get a Amen
    Amen,

    and
    "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [Warren v. District of Columbia,(D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)]
    If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand

  11. #10
    Member Array Sonic Misfit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    422
    Great Article. I wish there were more media people who thinks that way she does.

    I wonder if anyone is going to try and sue for not allowing CCW on campus. That would be very interesting.

  12. #11
    Member Array MSGTTBAR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    PENSACOLA, FL
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonic Misfit View Post
    Great Article. I wish there were more media people who thinks that way she does.

    I wonder if anyone is going to try and sue for not allowing CCW on campus. That would be very interesting.
    Check out townhall.com to read this and other columns relating to this subject and be sure to read all the comments. Enlightening, to say the least. Gun control debate is all over the political blogs today.
    Life is too short to be serious!

  13. #12
    Member Array bcnu1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Southwest Missouri
    Posts
    23
    I think that the students and teachers, should have the option to carry if they are licensed to do so elsewhere. Had only one person been armed...

    Now though, look at it in the light that nobody rushed the gunman, nobody used any of the weapons readily available in the class rooms, ie: chairs, computer towers, books, themselves. What if 20 people would have rushed him, a few would have been shot but not all. I still don't see how one person could have killed so many with so little resistance. America has become a culture of followers with no leaders. Gone are the days of thinking, here are the days of book smart and no common sense.

    As for if everyone could carry, the killer could have carried too so I don't know how that would play out in the gun debate.

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array SammyIamToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,087
    I usually don't care for Michelle Malkin very much, but she was 100% spot on in this one.
    ...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller

  15. #14
    VIP Member Array obxned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    OBX, NC
    Posts
    2,655
    "Just call 911 and let the police handle it". Well, we all saw how the huge number of police on the VT campus were able to prevent additional deaths after the initial call.

    It is obvious that the only way to insure your personal safety is to do it personally! Self-important idiots make rules that get people killed. They need to be held accountable!!
    "If we loose Freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the Last Place on Earth!" Ronald Reagan

  16. #15
    VIP Member Array peacefuljeffrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    south Florida
    Posts
    3,168
    indeed.

    Ms. Malkin is one of the few around who has a widely heard voice but uses it to enunciate reason!

    Gotta love her.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Arizona OC Culture?!
    By JimmyC4 in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: April 18th, 2010, 06:03 PM
  2. Hawaiin Gun Culture?
    By buckeye .45 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 22nd, 2007, 02:27 PM
  3. The culture of sheep.
    By havegunjoe in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: May 24th, 2007, 05:58 PM
  4. The culture of sheep.
    By havegunjoe in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: May 24th, 2007, 05:58 PM
  5. +1 for the gun culture
    By joe/OH in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: April 16th, 2006, 09:38 PM