US S.1237 would let the AG block firearms purchases without due process

This is a discussion on US S.1237 would let the AG block firearms purchases without due process within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=223 BELLEVUE, WA – Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ troubling support of legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block ...

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: US S.1237 would let the AG block firearms purchases without due process

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array paramedic70002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Franklin, VA
    Posts
    5,126

    US S.1237 would let the AG block firearms purchases without due process

    http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=223

    BELLEVUE, WA – Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ troubling support of legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block firearms purchases without due process is cause for him to step down as the nation’s highest ranking law enforcement officer, the Second Amendment Foundation said today.

    The bill, S. 1237, was introduced last week at the Justice Department’s request by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), one of the most extreme anti-gunners in Congress. Called the “Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2007,” this legislation would give the Attorney General discretionary authority to deny the purchase of a firearm or the issuance of a firearm license or permit because of some vague suspicion that an American citizen may be up to no good.

    “This bill,” said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, “raises serious concerns about how someone becomes a ‘suspected terrorist.’ Nobody has explained how one gets their name on such a list, and worse, nobody knows how to get one’s name off such a list.

    “The process by which someone may appeal the Attorney General’s arbitrary denial seems weak at best,” Gottlieb suggested, “and there is a greater concern. When did we decide as a nation that it is a good idea to give a cabinet member the power to deny someone’s constitutional right simply on suspicion, without a trial or anything approaching due process?

    “We’re not surprised that General Gonzales has found an agreeable sponsor in Frank Lautenberg,” Gottlieb observed. “The senator from New Jersey has never seen a restrictive gun control scheme he did not immediately embrace, and S. 1237 is loaded with red flags. It would allow an appointed bureaucrat the authority to suspend or cancel someone’s Second Amendment right without even being charged with a crime.

    “Attorney General Gonzales has no business asking for that kind of power over any tenet in the Bill of Rights,” Gottlieb said. “He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, not trample it. Perhaps it is time for him to go.”
    "Each worker carried his sword strapped to his side." Nehemiah 4:18

    Guns Save Lives. Paramedics Save Lives. But...
    Paramedics With Guns Scare People!

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array obxned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    OBX, NC
    Posts
    2,655
    Does anyone in Washington know about the Constitution???
    "If we loose Freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the Last Place on Earth!" Ronald Reagan

  4. #3
    Distinguished Member Array Bob The Great's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Slidell, LA
    Posts
    1,688
    right. constitutionality be damned. it's just an old piece of paper, anyway, right?

  5. #4
    VIP Member
    Array falcon1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    6,482
    Very, very bad...I guess the Fourteenth Amendment means less and less these days...but we may have already known that.

    And if only the provision of due process was included....would it be any less effective? Is the concern somehow that intelligence gathering methods are compromised? Would it kill us to do things under rule of law???

  6. #5
    Member Array Slider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    S Dakota
    Posts
    126
    Now adays if its not PC then it can be changed, anyway the more in-lightened Lib wishes. Weuns are to stupid to know whats good fur us.

  7. #6
    Senior Member Array cagueits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    911

    Exclamation

    For the Bill's text go here:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c110GOTkws::

    Current status: (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:s.01237:)

    S.1237

    Title: A bill to increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of firearms and explosives licenses to known or suspected dangerous terrorists.

    Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 4/26/2007) Cosponsors (7)

    Latest Major Action: 4/26/2007 Referred to Senate committee.

    Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    Let our representatives know how we feel about this bill (use Congress' Messaging Service):

    http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm

    (A simple "Hey you, this is me, oppose this bill, thank you" will do it).

    Also, send a quick note to the Committee's President and any members of the committee who are also your state's senator:

    http://judiciary.senate.gov/members.cfm (click on the link of your state's senator, then find the "contact senator..." link for the Congress' messaging service)

    There are no hearings for this bill at this time (http://judiciary.senate.gov/schedule_all.cfm)
    Last edited by cagueits; May 11th, 2007 at 02:41 PM.

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array incredipete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    643
    I hate it when people who skipped Civics class get put into power...
    Gun Control means never having to say "I missed you."

    - Glock 27 (.40)
    - Kel-Tec p3at (.380)
    - Beretta 96FS (.40)
    - Smith & Wesson 5906 (9mm)

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Federal agents ordered to allow illegal firearms purchases in Arizona
    By loboleather in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: March 7th, 2011, 12:41 AM
  2. Two New Purchases
    By tkruf in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: December 9th, 2010, 02:53 AM
  3. Pre-Crime comes to HR...how long before firearms purchases?
    By packinnova in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 1st, 2010, 09:41 AM
  4. My next four purchases
    By Rollo in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: February 2nd, 2010, 09:34 AM
  5. Government Tracking of Firearms Purchases
    By HotGuns in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: September 17th, 2008, 11:19 AM