This is a discussion on "Assault Weapon" ban within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by bigiceman "I don't own any assault rifles, just counter-assault rifles." That's a good one. I think we need to get away from ...
I really enjoy browsing all the forums, the education one gets really useful : Bill of Rights NOT needs.
Counter assault rifle
Low powered semi auto riflle
Excellent Excellent Excellent !!!!
I have a degree in history from MTSU in Murfreesboro, TN and the impression is that the Bill of Rights was the reason that the states ratified the constitution. In my humble opinion if any of the rights are voided then the constitution is void.
Originally Posted by Tubby45
I remind them it is called the Bill of Rights not the Bill of Needs.AMEN! Very well said.Originally Posted by bigiceman
"I don't own any assault rifles, just counter-assault rifles."
I hope this doesn't sound too kooky but, among the reasons I bought a WASR-10, besides the simplicity of the gun, the design being so rugged and the price was the fact that most of our enemies use it as their battle rifle. In the, hopefully, unlikely event we are ever invaded (watch Red Dawn and substitute Communist China for the USSR or Middle East Terrorist types for the USSR, or maybe don't substitute anyone for the USSR since it appears they may be on a return track) there may be ammo and magazines a plenty for these weapons on every dead invader I may run across.
I still want an AR but it pays to think a head.....