The Journalist's Guide to Gun Violence Coverage

The Journalist's Guide to Gun Violence Coverage

This is a discussion on The Journalist's Guide to Gun Violence Coverage within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by defenseissues.com The Journalist's Guide to Gun Violence Coverage By. Dr. Michael Brown Guns are a sad fact of life in American culture ...

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    VIP Member Array LongRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,618

    The Journalist's Guide to Gun Violence Coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by defenseissues.com
    The Journalist's Guide to Gun Violence Coverage
    By. Dr. Michael Brown
    Guns are a sad fact of life in American culture and are a major topic in modern journalism. A good Journalist has a duty to get involved and make a difference in this important societal debate. By following certain guidelines, the concerned Journalist can be assured of having the maximum impact on this shameful problem.

    The first principle to remember is that subtle use of terminology can covertly influence the reader. Adjectives should be chosen for maximum anti-gun effect. When describing a gun, attach terms like "automatic," "semi-automatic," "large caliber," "deadly," "high powered," or "powerful". Almost any gun can be described by one or more of these terms. More than two guns should be called an "arsenal".

    Try to include the term "assault weapon" if at all possible. This can be combined with any of the terms above for best results. Nobody actually knows what an assault weapon is, so you cannot be criticized for this usage. Your local anti-gun organization can provide you with a list of the latest buzz words like "junk guns," "Saturday Night Specials," and "the criminal’s weapon of choice".

    Don’t worry about getting technical details right. Many a reporter has accidentally written about semi-automatic revolvers or committed other minor errors. Since most people know little about guns, this is not a problem. Only the gun nuts will complain and they don’t count. The emotional content of your article is much more important than the factual details, since people are more easily influenced through their emotions than through logic.

    Broadcast Journalists should have a file tape showing a machine gun firing on full automatic. Run this video while describing "automatic" weapons used in a crime or confiscated by police. At the least, a large graphic of a handgun should be displayed behind the on-air personality when reading any crime story.

    Do not waste words describing criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Instead of calling them burglar, rapist, murderer, or repeat offender, simply use the term "gunman". This helps the public associate all forms of crime and violence with the possession of guns.

    Whenever drug dealers are arrested, guns are usually confiscated by the police. Mention the type and number of guns more prominently than the type and quantity of drugs. Include the number of rounds of ammunition seized, since the number will seem large to those who know little about guns. Obviously, the drug dealers who had the guns should now be called "gunmen".

    Political discussions on gun control legislation usually involve pro-gun organizations. Always refer to these organizations as "the gun lobby". If space permits, mention how much money the gun lobby has spent to influence political campaigns and describe their legislative lobbying efforts as "arm twisting" or "threats".

    Gun owners must never be seen in a positive light. Do not mention that these misguided individuals may actually be well educated, or have respectable jobs and healthy families. They should be called "gun nuts" if possible or simply gun owners at best. Mention details about their clothing, especially if they are wearing hunting clothes or hats. Mention the simplistic slogans on their bumper stickers to show that their intelligence level is low. Many gun owners drive pickup trucks, hunt and live in rural areas. Use these details to help portray them as ignorant rednecks. Don’t use the word "hunt". Always say that they "kill" animals.

    Don’t be afraid to interview these people, they are harmless even though we don’t portray them that way. Try to solicit comments that can be taken out of context to show them in the worst possible light.

    Never question the effectiveness of gun control laws or proposals. Guns are evil and kill people. Removing guns from society can only be good. Nobody really uses guns for legitimate self-defense, especially women or children. Any stories about armed self-defense must be minimized or suppressed.

    Be careful about criticizing the police for responding slowly to 911 calls for help. It is best if the public feels like the police can be relied upon to protect them at all times. If people are buying guns to protect their families, you are not doing your job.

    Emphasize stories where people kill family members and/or themselves with guns. It is important to make the public feel like they could lose control and start killing at any moment if they have a gun in the house. Any story where a child misuses a gun is front page material.

    View every shooting as an event to be exploited. Always include emotional quotes from the victim’s family if possible. If they are not available, the perpetrator’s family will do nicely. The quote must blame the tragedy on the availability of guns. Photos or video of grieving family members are worth a thousand facts. Most people will accept the assertion that guns cause crime. It is much easier than believing that some people deliberately choose to harm others.

    Your story should include terms like "tragic" or "preventable" and mention the current toll of gun violence in your city or state. Good reporters always know exactly how many gun deaths have occurred in their area since the first of the year. List two or three previous incidents of gun violence to give the impression of a continuing crime wave.

    Little space should be devoted to shootings where criminals kill each other. Although these deaths greatly inflate the annual gun violence numbers, they distract from the basic mission of urging law abiding citizens to give up their guns. Do not dig too deeply into the reasons behind shootings. The fact that a gun was involved is the major point, unless someone under 18 is affected, in which case the child angle is now of equal importance.

    Any article about gun violence should include quotes from anti-gun organizations or politicians. One quote should say that we must do something "for the children". Anti-gun spokespersons should be called "activists" or "advocates". If your employer wishes to appear unbiased, you can include one token quote from a gun lobby group to show that you are being fair. The anti-gun statements should be accepted as fact. The gun lobby statement can be denigrated by including text like, "according to gun lobbyist Jones."

    Fortunately, statements from anti-gun organizations come in short sound bites that are perfect for generating an emotional response in the reader or viewer. Gun lobby statements usually contain boring facts that are easy to ignore.

    Feel secure in your advocacy journalism. The vast majority of your fellow Journalists support your activism. The nation will be a better place when only the police and military have guns. Remember that you are doing it for the children so the end justifies the means.

    Eventually, the government will have a monopoly on power. Don’t worry about the right to freedom of the press, just contact me then for more helpful hints.

    Professor Michael Brown
    School of Journalism, Brady Chair
    Vancouver College of Liberal Arts

    Political Satire, copyright 1999, Michael Brown. May be reproduced freely in its full and complete form. The author may be contacted at mb@e-z.net
    One glaring rule he left out was if you are ever required to cover one of these vigilante rampages gun fanatics call "Self Defense Shootings" you must point out how very lucky everyone is that greater harm was not done. By sheer luck good fortune many others were not killed or maimed. Is there a gas station within a mile? A single stray bullet from the gun nuts automatic weapon could have caused it to blow up as we have often seen in televised docudramas. Did it occur in a residential neighborhood? How many children lives did this irresponsible vigilante put at risk? Hospitals schools retirement homes office building filled full of innocent citizens believing they are safe in their "Gun Free Zones' could have died that day due to one misguided cretin pretending to be John Wayne. Last do not forget that the "Alleged Criminal' that was "Murdered" is "The Victim and the "Gun Fanatic" is the "Assailant"
    Abort the Obamanation not the Constitution

    Those who would, deny, require permit, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as vile, dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family


  2. #2
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    44,793
    Sure is the truth, isn't it?
    I get so sick of the twisted media's hype and exaggerations...
    ...and the believe it all! SAD!

    Stay armed...stay safe!
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  3. #3
    VIP Member
    Array simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    3,018
    Dr Michael Brown....doktor brown is a good reason to vote wisely...

  4. #4
    Member Array dang.45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Wherever I may wander...
    Posts
    315
    Political Satire, copyright 1999, Michael Brown. May be reproduced freely in its full and complete form. The author may be contacted at mb@e-z.net

    You guys did see this bit at the end, right?

    I don't doubt that this attitude, or something similar, is fairly prevalent among journalists - just watch your local or national news if you think it isn't - but this particular piece is clearly satire.
    "It is only as retaliation that force may be used and only against the man who starts its use. No, I do not share his evil or sink to his concept of morality: I merely grant him his choice, destruction, the only destruction he had a right to choose: his own." - John Galt, from Atlas Shrugged

  5. #5
    VIP Member
    Array simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    3,018
    It may be satire,but to a good many smear journalist it is food! Just reminds me of how important and vigilant we must be about protecting our rights,,the only way we can do that is vote man,vote!
    Off soapbox now...

  6. #6
    Member Array dang.45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Wherever I may wander...
    Posts
    315
    http://www.americanprotest.net/columns/08182006.php

    This looks like it was the original posting of the above column. If you check out the sight, you'll see that definitely is not an "anti" sight. The only reason I point it out is that I don't want this Micheal Brown guy to take any undue heat for the article. But he does seem to have the typical idiot-journalist mindset down to a tee though, doesn't he?
    "It is only as retaliation that force may be used and only against the man who starts its use. No, I do not share his evil or sink to his concept of morality: I merely grant him his choice, destruction, the only destruction he had a right to choose: his own." - John Galt, from Atlas Shrugged

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array swiftyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Madera, CA
    Posts
    2,488
    Great satire. Unfortunately, it is so true. I was thinking of sending this to our local tv stations, but they would not see it as satire.
    John
    Assault is a behavior, not a device.

    "Don't never take no shortcuts." Patty Reed, Donner Party

    Lifetime NRA member

  8. #8
    Distinguished Member Array Bob The Great's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Slidell, LA
    Posts
    1,688
    yep, sounds about right.
    "A well-educated electorate, being necessary to the continuance of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed."
    Is this hard to understand? Then why does it get unintelligible to some people when 5 little words are changed?

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Journalist's Guide to Firearm ID
    By PastorPack in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: November 12th, 2009, 10:14 PM
  2. Factual view on gun violence vs other "violence"
    By buckwoods in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 14th, 2009, 04:31 PM
  3. A journalist turned by logic
    By CopperKnight in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: May 2nd, 2007, 07:02 PM
  4. A true journalist among media sheep!
    By Miggy in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 18th, 2007, 08:10 PM
  5. Journalist Roll call.
    By 4my sons in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 20th, 2006, 09:26 PM

Search tags for this page

dr. michael brown guns

,

journalist guide to gun violence

,

the journalist guide to gun violence coverage

Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors