Should private gun sales be subject to background checks? [POLL]

This is a discussion on Should private gun sales be subject to background checks? [POLL] within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Voted no Results so far: Yes- 40% No- 58% Undecided-2% Out of 1126 votes...

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 79

Thread: Should private gun sales be subject to background checks? [POLL]

  1. #31
    Member Array lopadrino79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    182
    Voted no

    Results so far:
    Yes- 40%
    No- 58%
    Undecided-2% Out of 1126 votes

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #32
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24,227
    Quote Originally Posted by semlak0316 View Post
    On a Side note: I enjoy reading and discussing everyones opinions in a civil & sensible manner even in disagreement.. Not many places you can do that anymore withoout a major battle!
    Double ditto, on that. Defensivecarry.com is a breath of fresh air, in that regard. Kudos to everyone, for keeping the trash at an absolute minimum.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  4. #33
    Senior Member Array ronwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    816
    Voted NO. I do believe, however, that the seller should be held accountable should they knowingly sell to a felon.

  5. #34
    VIP Member Array raevan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    washington
    Posts
    4,849
    I voted no.
    Washington state has a form that can be filled out volentarily to CYA. See attached.
    Attached Files

  6. #35
    VIP Member
    Array falcon1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    6,408
    I foresee this as a potential next step: before you can sell it with a background check, prove that you acquired the firearm legally (not that you did, but that you must be able to prove it). How to do that? Forms filed with an FFL or the state as part of the background check that must be maintained in perpetuity for the next sale (de facto registration)?

    Step following that: if you can't prove it, we confiscate it.


    "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean the world isn't out to get you."

  7. #36
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    Quote Originally Posted by ccw9mm View Post
    Double ditto, on that.
    Defensivecarry.com is a breath of fresh air, in that regard. Kudos to everyone, for keeping the trash at an absolute minimum.
    Triple that!

    Decorum, reasonableness, and manner in the arena of discussion and debate seems today to be a lost art form amongst adults in specific be they in person and especially so via the internet.
    This forum and it's membership at large is IMHO excellent to that degree accommodating point and counterpoint type discussion.

    IMHO DC.com is like a blast of Primatene Mist amongst the average otherwise generally restrictive in collective view GunFu related sites.

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  8. #37
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,635
    As to sale how does a person you've bought from pass on your info to the ATF or FBI or state/local PD when they come knocking asking about X, Y, or Z firearm they are federally registered as having purchased in XX year and has now been traced to a crime?
    Do they say yeah well I sold that gun like 3 yrs. ago to this fella he seemed like a good guy at the time.
    I think that the ATF knocking on someones door asking about a gun is about as possible as winning the lottery. Asking at gun shops perhaps,but I have never known of ever heard of anyone being asked about guns that they bought or sold, from the ATF.

    Federally registered? No such thing. The Fed don't require registrations of anything other than Class 3 stuff. Not yet anyways.
    Some of the communist states require registration but most do not.

    Since it is not illegal to sell a gun to another person, without paperwork, if you are a private citizen, it doesn't matter what the ATF "thinks". If they come knocking on my door asking about something I bought or sold, I"ll be as truthful as my memory dictates.

    I do believe, however, that the seller should be held accountable should they knowingly sell to a felon.
    It is already LAW. You cannot knowingly sell to a convicted felon. If you do and get caught, you will be held accountable. If you have an FFL you will lose it, if it can be proved that you knew the party that you sold to was ineligible, you may be occupying the same bunk bed in the same cell.
    The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it...- George Orwell

    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
    http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/

  9. #38
    VIP Member Array packinnova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    4,196
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    To no one in particular...

    Not only NO but heck NO.

    Its a private transaction. The federal government has NO business regulating private transactions of merchandise, and anybody that vots YES it allowing the camel to get his nose into the tent. Give the feds and inch and they will take a mile.

    Looks like we need some thought modification here. This YES mentality is exactly the reason that we gunowners keep getting our tails slapped into the dirt with stupid and worthless items of gun control, like the Brady Bill or the so called limitations on assault rifles that certain communist members of Congress have made it their lifelong ambition to pass.

    I dont know why some people dont understand that laws only affect those that choose to abide by them....while scuzballs laugh at people that actually think that the law means something to them.

    The goods guys say, I dont have anything to fear...cause I'm a good guy, but they are the first ones to squall like mashed cats when they have to pay a 20,30,40 or 50 dollar fee because they voted for backgound checks on private transactions. You so called do gooders get everything you deserve, and the heck of it is that your shortsighteness will cost me too.

    With "friends" like that...who needs enemies?
    I can't say much other than that...You've already spelled it out the same way I would.

    Frankly some of the other responses on here scare me a bit. Perhaps we should require background checks before we sell our cars "private sale" eh? They're dangerous too right? I mean just this past year some ding dong somewhere plowed through a crowded marketplace. Whether I'm selling a soccer ball, car, pack of smokes, or a firearm makes no difference. The government should NOT under any circumstances be given the power to control that transaction. What they have is already too much.

    Quote Originally Posted by semlak0316 View Post
    If a Background Check would clear me of Liability, Then how is that a bad thing???Even if I sell a gun to a good friend and something happens then I am possibly accountable in some way or it is "percieved" that I am accountable in some way? I guess I would not have a problem with a Background check. What if I am the buyer? If I am legal to own a Gun, Do I care about a Background check??

    Just my 2 cents...

    Mike
    So your suggesting that rather than fix our fouled up, bastardized court system, we should give up more of our lives to be controlled by some outside collective (otherwise known as the "government")?
    "My God David, We're a Civilized society."

    "Sure, As long as the machines are workin' and you can call 911. But you take those things away, you throw people in the dark, and you scare the **** out of them; no more rules...You'll see how primitive they can get."
    -The Mist (2007)

  10. #39
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    I think that the ATF knocking on someones door asking about a gun is about as possible as winning the lottery. Asking at gun shops perhaps,but I have never known of ever heard of anyone being asked about guns that they bought or sold, from the ATF...
    This occurs often and as I'd said in full not just the ATF (govt.) but indicated state and local police as well.
    As to not hearing of as much I guess than you never heard of or rather forgotten about the law enforcement research activities following the actions of initially sane and sensible seeming customers Cho Seung-Hui aka the 'VA Tech Shooter' or John Allen Muhammad aka 'The DC Sniper' (Federal agents end examination of Tacoma gun shop tied to sniper) or even most just this past October the case of Michele Cossey mother of the kid who with firearms she illegally straw purchased with intent to distribute to a minor, her son, who then subsequently planned out an attack using these firearms on his school (Prosecutor: Mom bought weapons for boy - CNN.com).
    In all of the above cases and many more as per norm when firearms are involved law enforcement be it federal, state, or local will and do track down where firearms came from and how they came to be in the hands of the accused.
    As such taking easy and simple and reasonable notes toward a seller upon a F2F interaction is a wise thing to do as one with persons strange and foreign to us do not know and have no real way to tel what might be in their hearts or minds toward intent or even their own ability to make sound judgment that as a result may end with po-po knocking on our own door asking who, why, when, where, what, and how much (?!).

    Personally I'm not willing to risk my time, savings, good name amongst my community or even liberty for the sake of investing unwarranted trust to a person completely foreign and strange to me aside from he/she has greenbacks toward payment against purchase of a firearm.

    Federally registered? No such thing. The Fed don't require registrations of anything other than Class 3 stuff. Not yet anyways...
    Yes, there is and they do and not just for Class 3 stuff.

    In November 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Act) was signed into law. The Brady Act requires Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to request background checks on individuals attempting to receive a firearm. The permanent provisions of the Brady Act, which went into effect on November 30, 1998, required the United States Attorney General to establish the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) so that any FFL may contact for information to be supplied immediately as to whether the receipt of a firearm by a prospective transferee would violate Title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 922 (g) or (n) or state law.

    The NICS Section, located at the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services Division in Clarksburg, West Virginia, provides full service to FFLs in 30 states and five U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia. Upon completion of the required Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Form 4473, FFLs contact the FBI NICS Section, via a toll-free telephone number or electronically through the NICS E-Check System via the Internet, to request a background check with the descriptive information provided on the ATF Form 4473. The NICS is customarily available 17 hours a day, 7 days a week, including holidays (except for Christmas).

    Thirteen states have agencies acting on behalf of the NICS in a full Point-Of-Contact (POC) capacity. These POC states, which have agreed to implement and maintain their own Brady NICS Program, conduct firearm background checks for FFLs' transactions in their respective states by electronically accessing the NICS. Upon completion of the required ATF Form 4473, the FFLs conducting business in the POC states contact a designated state agency to initiate a NICS background check in lieu of contacting the NICS Section.

    Additionally, eight states are currently sharing responsibility with the NICS Section by acting as partial POCs. Partial-POC states have agencies designated to conduct checks for handguns and/or handgun permits, while the NICS Section handles the processing of the states transactions for long gun purchases. The NICS Participation Map, as illustrated below, depicts each state's level of participation with the NICS.



    CJIS Division Homepage
    ATF Form 4473

    Source - DRAFT ATF F 4473 (5300.9)
    Form 4473 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    BATF Gun Registration

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  11. #40
    VIP Member
    Array Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Posts
    5,050
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    I think that the ATF knocking on someones door asking about a gun is about as possible as winning the lottery. Asking at gun shops perhaps,but I have never known of ever heard of anyone being asked about guns that they bought or sold, from the ATF.
    Well they did send a couple Feds. Went to the local gun shop, researched the 4473s and came to my house. Three of my friends were visited. When they want your info they go to the gun stores and go through the 4473s. Then they track you down. All it takes is the right crime to occur and you get to win the lottery.
    Procrastinators are the leaders of tomorrow.

  12. #41
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    Yep.
    That is exactly what, how, and why it does happen. ^^

    People hit the lottery every week.

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  13. #42
    Member Array libertarian5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    4 Corners
    Posts
    357
    I'm all over the map on this issue. If it was a free, internet check so that a gun shop didn't get a cut from every private sale, them maybe.

    I recall a topic a while back where some Mexican Police officers went to a Arizona gun show and bought some guns from a non-dealer. The prevailing concensus on the board was that arresting them was a good thing. Guns are generally prohibited in Mexico, and most of the ones being used AGAINST the police in the ongoing Mexico vs Cartel battles were purchased in border towns of the USA via private sales. A background check would certainly help prevent this. I work and travel Mexico frequently and I would like to see the police shut those cartels down forever.

    Having said all that, I was denied a purchase once because I have the same name as a BG on the other side of the state. That is a aggravating and embarrasing situation. The local sheriff finally got it straightened out for me when I got my CCW, but it took him a month to do it . (He has my vote forever) Any big database system is subject to problems like that and I doubt that a 72 hour hold is going to work well for private sales.

  14. #43
    VIP Member
    Array goawayfarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fork Union, Virginia
    Posts
    2,682
    Sadly, I think we will lose this fight as well. Eventually 'big brother' will force NICS check on ALL firearm transfers, even the ones you give to relatives.

    We have too many in the firearms community that will agree that the government should check all sales. We already know where the anti's side. As a result, it will be forced on the rest of us, just as the 'kitchen table' dealers were run out o' Dodge.

    Another thing that will happen, is this will lead to registration of all transactions as well. The thought that...... 'it'll be OK if government destroys the records after the instant check' , is at best, wishful thinking. The anti's will argue that we need to keep the records so that when a firearm is used in a crime, they will need to know who now owns it!....The only way for that to work is REGISTRATION!

    ....See how this works? Once the camel gets his nose under the tent you are screwed!

    The best you do is get, or give a receipt when selling/buying a gun...even if you hand write it.

    This is the same path the UK, Australia & Canada went down & looked what has happened there!
    Last edited by goawayfarm; January 20th, 2008 at 08:15 PM.
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.-Seneca

    "If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. If I have a gun, what do I have to be paranoid about?" -Clint Smith

    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Jeff Cooper

  15. #44
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,635
    This is the same path the UK, Australia & Canada went down & looked what has happened there!
    That's exactly right. It is history.
    The real problem is that history is no longer taught in public schools, so we are doomed to go down the same path.
    The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it...- George Orwell

    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
    http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/

  16. #45
    VIP Member Array SammyIamToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,087
    Quote Originally Posted by matdicdad View Post
    Yes, why not?
    I don't like being considered guilty until proven innocent by some background check. I've never committed a single violent crime against anyone and I'd like to not be treated as if I have. And no, it's not okay even if it only takes a few seconds to complete, it's still treating me as if I'm guilty until proven innocent. This is supposed to be a free country, not a country of semi-minimalist restrictions so a bunch of idiots who base their arguments upon emotions can sleep better at night (read: anti-gun morons and FUDDS)

    Quote Originally Posted by Miggy View Post
    I voted NO and it was running Yes 41% No 57%

    If the question was posed by anybody in this board, the answer might be different. But since it was posed by a MSM member, my answer is NO and HELL NO. Let me illustrate my reasoning:
    I find this sort of ironic considering how much you supported background checks in stores in that other thread where we discussed the merits of the '68 gun control act/NRA. Why do you make the distinction?
    ...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. How do I obtain a UPIN to speed up background checks?
    By krag in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: January 7th, 2013, 04:04 AM
  2. Background Checks
    By zeppelin03 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 6th, 2010, 01:04 PM
  3. FBI temporarily suspends fingerprint background checks
    By DropTop in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: April 25th, 2010, 09:54 PM
  4. The Bangor Daily: Mayors’ group pushes for background checks on sales at gun shows
    By WhoWeBePart1 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 21st, 2010, 09:17 PM
  5. FL may issue w/o background checks
    By rolyat63 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: May 21st, 2009, 01:50 AM

Search tags for this page

counterpoints to brady handgun act
,

how to get rid of a dishonorable discharge

,
kansas ftf transaction require background check
,
krag serial number registry
,
legal responsibility of private gun sales
,
should gun sales have background checks
Click on a term to search for related topics.