Parks officials urge lawmakers: Keep gun ban - Page 3

Parks officials urge lawmakers: Keep gun ban

This is a discussion on Parks officials urge lawmakers: Keep gun ban within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Wow, this post got busy! Background: I've hunted quail, dove, duck, pheasants and deer. I do not really have a stake in this matter, I'm ...

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 48

Thread: Parks officials urge lawmakers: Keep gun ban

  1. #31
    Member
    Array GBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    468
    Wow, this post got busy!

    Background: I've hunted quail, dove, duck, pheasants and deer.

    I do not really have a stake in this matter, I'm not a ranger, nor do I belong to any wildlife protection organization.

    I agree with self-protection, and the right to own firearms.

    Somehow in the posts, there seems to be a lack of emphasis on what a National Park is. TR started it as a preserve, seeing the shrinking wilderness and knowing that wildlife habitat is not infinite.

    One post brought up an interesting suggestion that people are tasty morsels. I tend to believe that people taste more in line with the way they act...

    My experiences in Yosemite, hiking the trails for over 5 years, was that I saw one bear, he had so many tags and monitoring equipment, he looked like a low power FM station - Not to say there was not a pucker factor, but he was not hungry and I was not armed.

    I am sure I will not change a single mind, all I ask is that we keep in mind, we are in their territory.
    Last edited by GBS; February 12th, 2008 at 06:14 PM.


  2. #32
    Senior Member Array ridurall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SW Oklahoma
    Posts
    766
    While President Bush is still Commander in Chief I suggest that he remove a bunch of these anti-second ammendment people from the Park Ranger service.
    Life member NRA since 1983
    I carry a Kimber Ultra Carry II in a Crossbreed SuperTuck. My wife carries a Walther PPS .40 w/Crossbreed holster.

  3. #33
    Senior Member Array cwblanco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Amarillo, Texas
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by GBS View Post
    My views on self defense are about as permissive as can be, except for National Parks.

    Carry if you wish, but I am one of those who really does have a problem with carrying in a place where the natural instinct is to go into 'hunt mode'.

    I am not against hunting - in lawful areas, the sport has its rightful place in the giant scheme of things.

    I hope no one takes my view as a personal attack, that is not what I am trying to convey. In fact, I would gladly walk with anyone on this board in an urban setting, even into a shopping mall.

    But there is just something about guns and the great-out-doors that tends to give me pause. It just seems too likely that someone will use a weapon on a buck/bear/bison because 'it was getting too close to the kids'.

    If I were to support the CCW in the parks it would be with the understanding that the punishment for use of a weapon in the National Parks ought to be as severe as what would happen if the same person brandished a weapon on a crowded school grounds.
    What you say is very strange, and gives me reason to wonder how much you have been in the wilderness areas and national parks. I have been back packing in federal wilderness areas for over 35 years where the carrying of firearms are permitted. I have never seen anyone hunting unlawfully or out of season, or for that matter abusing fire arms carrying privileges. Maybe it is a hazard in your particular area, but not in the rocky mountains.

    Some national parks are larger than the designated wilderness areas. Based upon your reasoning (hunting), please tell me why the federal laws for areas regulated by the Department of Agriculture and the areas regulated by the Department of Interior should be different.

  4. #34
    Member Array Jason Rogers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lorton Virginia
    Posts
    211
    Quote Originally Posted by GBS View Post
    Wow, this post got busy!

    Background: I've hunted quail, dove, duck, pheasants and deer.

    I do not really have a stake in this matter, I'm not a ranger, nor do I belong to any wildlife protection organization.

    I agree with self-protection, and the right to own firearms.

    Somehow in the posts, there seems to be a lack of emphasis on what a National Park is. TR started it as a preserve, seeing the shrinking wilderness and knowing that wildlife habitat is not infinite.

    One post brought up an interesting suggestion that people are tasty morsels. I tend to believe that people taste more in line with the way they act...

    My experiences in Yosemite, hiking the trails for over 5 years, was that I saw one bear, he had so many tags and monitoring equipment, he looked like a low power FM station - Not to say there was not a pucker factor, but he was not hungry and I was not armed.

    I am sure I will not change a single mind, all I ask is that we keep in mind, we are in their territory.
    Please consider for one moment that this whole issue has nothing to do with any animal whatsoever.

    Every year people are raped, beaten and murdered in the most shocking ways imaginable in national parks.

    The whole idea is that we have the right to protect ourselves from HUMAN violence. Even in national parks.
    -Jay

  5. #35
    VIP Member Array cphilip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,187
    It's real easy to say you don't want other people to be able to carry a gun when you get to carry one...

    I wish I was the only person in the world who got to carry one too. But who says I have a right to do that?

    Its not about "Their Parks" or "Their Job" its about our right to defend ourselves in OUR PARKS.

  6. #36
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,977
    Somehow in the posts, there seems to be a lack of emphasis on what a National Park is
    Right now, what a national park is...
    ...is a target rich environment that gives any crack dealer,meth lab technician or thug has the upper hand against anyone that they encounter because they know that people aren't armed.

    Do you think for a minute that Teddy Roosevelt would have advocated going into the wilderness unarmed? I don't. He was more of a man than that. It was common sense for people back then. Unfortunately today that is not true.

    I am 100 percent against gun free zones.
    Gun free zones are nothing more than feel good areas that get people killed.
    Mall...churches....schools....post offices.

    Gun free zones simply do not work.

    Unless you go on a killing spree. They work quite well for that.
    I would rather stand against the cannons of the wicked than against the prayers of the righteous.


    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
    http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/

  7. #37
    New Member Array stargazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10
    This has been a recent subject in the Second Amendment section here ! Look it up under S-2483, it may come up for consideration this week. Your Senators need to know your position. As leader of the Senate, also contact the Vice-President. We need to get this through as soon as possible ! Thanks for your help. All the links are provided in that section for your reps.

  8. #38
    Distinguished Member
    Array SleepingZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ne
    Posts
    1,737
    GBS----If I understand your position correctly, you are ok with CCW out-side of parks, you trust the permit holder to use good judgement in not shooting a human, but in the park you think their judgement will be impaired and they may shoot an animal, which you think would be worse????? Why would you extend more protection to an animal than a human???

    Outside of court-houses, I can see no reason for restriction of CCW.


    Z
    An ounce of lead is worth 200lbs of cop.

  9. #39
    VIP Member Array miklcolt45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    @ Wits' End
    Posts
    2,813
    Quote Originally Posted by GBS View Post
    I agree with self-protection, and the right to own firearms.

    One post brought up an interesting suggestion that people are tasty morsels.

    I am sure I will not change a single mind, all I ask is that we keep in mind, we are in their territory.
    GBS,

    I guess my take on all this is influenced by some of the research that someone on the forum (Rock & Glock, maybe?) did about the number of crimes in National Parks (and especially against rangers) and the lack of law enforcement available when stuff happens due to rangers having huge areas to cover.

    For me, the issue is my safety, not hunting. If I am going to hunt, I want a rifle. In fact, if I have to protect my life I want a rifle. But, at least a handgun gives me some protection from 2-legged predators.

    I want to be armed everywhere I go, not because I EXPECT trouble, but because I am PREPARED for it should it come my way.

    JMO. YMMV.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliott

    The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
    Albert Einstein

  10. #40
    Senior Member Array cwblanco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Amarillo, Texas
    Posts
    835
    You may be correct. He is an instructor at a university in central California, which coincidentally is the area where Berkley is located. His belief that a CCW goes into "hunt mode" while in a National Park is tantamount to saying that a combat veteran is in a "kill mode" while walking down the street as a civilian and seeing human targets.
    Last edited by QKShooter; February 12th, 2008 at 11:54 PM. Reason: edit to remove quoted text

  11. #41
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,577
    We do not attack other forum members here with name calling.
    Feel free to disagree with the message but, do not slander the messenger.
    If you call another forum member names or attack another member on a personal level you know those comments are just going to be deleted anyway so why make work for the moderators?
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  12. #42
    Member
    Array GBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    468
    If I gave the impression that I am 'standing in the way' of people carrying in the parks, I apologize.

    My comments were not intended to stir anyone up.

    I have given my personal opinion on the subject, as a matter for discussion.

    I'm not a political person, I have no influence on the outcome.

    I have read all replys and found most have merit.

    One post was absolutely right, I had accidentally blurred the line between hunters and poachers, but if I attempt to clarify I am sure I will upset others.

    Thank you for sharing your viewpoints.

    BTW: Bizerkley is about 4 hours away, I teach at a private university.

    And yes, I do have parents...

  13. #43
    VIP Member Array SammyIamToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,087
    I can't wait to start poaching black bears with my G23. Cmon NPS changes.
    ...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller

  14. #44
    Senior Member Array allenruger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    695
    Quote Originally Posted by SammyIamToday View Post
    I can't wait to start poaching black bears with my G23. Cmon NPS changes.
    Forget the black bears... going to get me one of them there wolves in Yellowstone that I hear so much about with my G26. Yee haw!!!!
    Allen

    -"I may get killed with my own gun, but he's gonna have to beat me to death with it, 'cause it's going to be empty." -Clint Smith

  15. #45
    Ex Member Array azchevy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Oceanfront Property
    Posts
    3,850
    This makes sense because if I am going to break the law and poach of course I am not going to do it where no firearms allowed signs are posted.

    The people in charge of this country have all lost their minds.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Feeling the urge...
    By Barbary in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: August 5th, 2010, 04:56 PM
  2. Crossbreed Urge!
    By Old Marine in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 2nd, 2010, 07:29 PM
  3. Have the Urge to get a Tac Light
    By Hivoltage in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: November 6th, 2005, 04:49 PM