CT Considering Microstamping and Ammunition Serialization

This is a discussion on CT Considering Microstamping and Ammunition Serialization within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Received this information via e-mail the other day: The anti-gun push is on in Hartford. This week, two proposals very dangerous to gun owners were ...

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: CT Considering Microstamping and Ammunition Serialization

  1. #1
    Distinguished Member Array CT-Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,510

    CT Considering Microstamping and Ammunition Serialization

    Received this information via e-mail the other day:

    The anti-gun push is on in Hartford. This week, two proposals
    very dangerous to gun owners were "raised" and could soon be
    considered by the Joint Judiciary Committee.

    Raised Bill No. 603 would require all ammunition sold in Connecticut
    to be coded with an individual serial number (ammunition
    serialization) and entered into a statewide database at the time of
    sale. Encoded ammunition would be registered to the purchaser and
    would include the date of transaction, the purchaser's name,
    date of birth, driver's license number, and the serial number of
    the ammunition. Not only would this measure cause enormous increases in the cost of ammunition, but it could lead to the establishment of a database of ammunition consumers and ultimately the cessation of the sale of ammunition in Connecticut.

    If that weren't enough, this legislation actually exposes gun owners to risk of criminal prosecution without them even knowing it! There is no way for the ammunition consumer to be assured that the serial number imprinted on the box matches the serial number on the rounds inside. Even if the industry can or will produce this ammunition exclusively for Connecticut, the consumers will be required to register ammunition purchases and then blindly trust that the number etched on the "base of the bullet projectile" is
    accurately represented on the box in which it is sold. Since the "base of the bullet projectile" is necessarily obscured by the cartridge case, it is impossible for the consumer to know if he or she has accurately "registered" their purchase.

    Raised Bill No. 607 would seek to ban the sale of semi-automatic handguns not equipped with so-called "microstamping" technology. Microstamping is a failed technology that would require identifying marks to be etched into the firing pin and breech face of a firearm. The technology can easily be defeated with common household tools, has no public safety value, and adds substantially to the cost of the firearm.

    Raised Bill No. 607 doesn't stop there! It would also outlaw the private sale or transfer of long guns. Please contact members of the Joint Judiciary Committee TODAY and respectfully urge them to oppose Raised Bill No. 603 and Raised Bill No. 607! The committee members can be contacted by phone at (860) 240-0100.
    If you live in CT, please contact your rep's and make your opinions known.
    "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."

    - Thomas Jefferson

    "I'm the arrow, you're my bow, shoot me forth and I will go"

    "Do not let any individual posts put a knot in your Big Boy Under-Roos"

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Member Array hickatheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ct
    Posts
    80
    sent our opinion!

  4. #3
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    21,627
    Good luck with killing the microstamping bill. You should be able too, even Maryland killed that in committee!
    Rick

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

  5. #4
    Senior Member Array coffeecup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cadiz,Ky
    Posts
    1,105
    Call Dillon with your credit card in hand.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Microstamping Ammunition
    By foots402 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: May 23rd, 2010, 06:04 PM
  2. Why Microstamping and Bullet Serialization Won’t Work
    By miklcolt45 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 21st, 2008, 11:37 PM
  3. New York Microstamping Bill
    By mrreynolds in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 14th, 2008, 09:04 PM
  4. Ammo Serialization Defeated in MD
    By kazzaerexys in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: March 1st, 2008, 12:35 PM
  5. Microstamping question
    By C9H13NO3 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: January 3rd, 2008, 12:02 AM