Safety In Defenselessness

[ronwill]

The author makes some very good points against those who think "It cannot be seriously contended that the Second Amendment, even if applicable, guarantees private persons a right of ownership or possession of firearms on the basis of an asserted need to resort to self-help."

Townhall.com::Safety in Defenselessness::By Jacob Sullum

[DefensiveCarry.com]

[Janq]

- D.C. residents

[gwhall57]

"...D.C. courts have convicted residents of violating other gun regulations even when they used their weapons for self-defense. In one such case, the district argued that "self-defense would only excuse the use of the weapon, not the possession of the weapon."

Where is the logic in this? Oh, I forgot, we're talking about the District...

[Ram Rod]

Safety In Defenselessness

Isn't that like a double negative? A contradiction in terms maybe?

[Magilla82ABN]

+1 for the Cats

[obxned]

This is why sharks and wolves have been forced to become vegetarians.

[Lensgrinder]

Isn't that like a double negative? A contradiction in terms maybe?

I think that's called a DCmoron.
No, no, no...
an OXYMORON

[Reborn]

I think that's called a DCmoron.
No, no, no...
an OXYMORON

I think you have went to far .....you have offended every common Moran in the world.....