Feinstein's question about Death Valley is valid.
Also if she had actually taken the time to read the text of the proposal she would know that the answer to her question is clearly stated there in;
"A person may possess, carry, and transport concealed, loaded, and operable firearms within a national wildlife refuge in the same manner, and to the same extent, that a person may lawfully possess, carry, and transport concealed, loaded and operable firearms in any state wildlife refuge, or any similar unit of state land,[b] in the state in which the national wildlife refuge, or that portion thereof, is located[b], provided that such possession, carrying and transporting otherwise complies with applicable federal and state law."
Source - http://federalregister.gov/OFRUpload...8-09606_PI.pdf
So the answer is right there in plain English clear and completely understandable as well as reasonable.
Persons in Death Valley Park on the CA side would be required to follow CA law while persons in the same park on the NV side would be required to follow the laws as toward that state. Simple and concise, Ms. Feinstein.
"Reading is fundamental." - R.I.F.