Michigan "Safety Inspection" Requirement
This is a discussion on Michigan "Safety Inspection" Requirement within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; On June 10th the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to recommend the passage of SB 370 and SB 371. These bills, in conjunction with HB ...
-
June 16th, 2008 10:10 AM
#1
Member
Array
Michigan "Safety Inspection" Requirement
On June 10th the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to recommend the passage of SB 370 and SB 371. These bills, in conjunction with HB 4490 and HB 4491, which have already been passed by the House, will eliminate the requirement that any pistol purchaser must have the pistol "safety inspected" by the local police within ten days of purchase.
SB 370 was sponsored by Senator Richardville, and SB 371 by Senator Cropsey. About twelve people, excluding the Committee and staff, were present. Following an explanation of the bills by a representative of Senator Richardville, MCRGO's legislative analyst briefly described the difficulties under present law faced by a pistol purchaser and made a plea not only for passage of the current bills but for complete elimination of the pistol purchase permit as well. No one else testified, either for or against these bills.
When these bills and the companion bills are passed by both houses, and the governor signs them, prospective purchasers of pistols will still have to obtain purchase permits from their local law enforcement office. CPL licensees, as is currently the case, will not be required to obtain purchase permits.
Committee members supporting both bills were Senators Kuipers (chairman), Cropsey, Whitmer, Clarke, and Pruse. Senators Sanborn and Patterson were not present.
The bills now go to the full Senate for action.
MICHIGAN COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERS
Getting closer.
** NRA Life Member***
Colt Defender .45
Kel-Tec .380
Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day.
-
June 16th, 2008 10:10 AM
Remove Ads
-
June 16th, 2008 10:14 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
Now there's a common sense bill if ever I saw one..... Congratulations, and good luck!
-
June 16th, 2008 10:38 AM
#3
Moderator
Array
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
-
June 16th, 2008 11:18 AM
#4
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
retsupt99
I respectfully disagree...

I used to live in MI...

OMO, but just having to GET a permit to buy a pistol is

...
Granted, having to get the (paid for) inspection is totally absurd, getting just the permit is not far behind.
Stay armed...stay safe!
you don't agree that this is a common sense bill?
I am sorry you didn't like MI, but as a CC community we have to take one step at a time.
----DOC-----
--people ask why I carry, and I show them this picture. I think it says it all.--
NRA Certified Instructor--many disciplines
-
June 16th, 2008 11:21 AM
#5
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
retsupt99
I respectfully disagree...

I used to live in MI...

OMO, but just having to GET a permit to buy a pistol is

...
Granted, having to get the (paid for) inspection is totally absurd, getting just the permit is not far behind.
Stay armed...stay safe!
You're right, of course. I guess I should have said, it's a good step in the right direction......and at least ccw holders don't need any additional permit.
Baby steps.......
-
June 16th, 2008 11:22 AM
#6
Member
Array
Michigan is definitely making headway, one step at a time. I think these law maker have done a great job. Keep this truck rolling.
** NRA Life Member***
Colt Defender .45
Kel-Tec .380
Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day.
-
June 16th, 2008 12:06 PM
#7
VIP Member
Array
Good Start. At least once you have your CPL you don't need to get permits anymore. Getting rid of that "inspection" will be excellent.
-
June 16th, 2008 12:38 PM
#8
Member
Array
I agree, getting rid of the 'inspection' would be great.
Out of curiosity, what happens under the current law if your weapon fails the 'inspection'? Does that happen?
Brian
-
June 16th, 2008 02:05 PM
#9
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Benthic
I agree, getting rid of the 'inspection' would be great.
Out of curiosity, what happens under the current law if your weapon fails the 'inspection'? Does that happen?
Brian
I don't believe it can fail inspection, as there is no inspecting going on. I is actually just a registration scheme. They only even handle the weapon to make sure it is empty and check the serial number, then they do some paperwork. The end.
-
June 16th, 2008 02:40 PM
#10
Member
Array
My several "safety inspections" involved a couple of Otsego county Sheriff's Deputies asking about the pistol being "inspected" and passing it around while the clerk typed the registration form. In the latest instance, the guys, who are good guys mind you, this being a small county, had never heard of CZ although they really liked the P01
While every pro gun change is for the best, what I would like to see is the elimination of pistol free zones here, with the exception of saloons. Guns and booze are a bad mixture.
-
June 16th, 2008 04:42 PM
#11
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
jongle
... While every pro gun change is for the best, what I would like to see is the elimination of pistol free zones here, with the exception of saloons. Guns and booze are a bad mixture.
Here in PA I have never ever, not once had any issues while packing in a restaurant that served alcohol or in a bar. Mind you, I never took to the Wild Turkey during those times and I never let my Glock take to the Wild Turkey.
Consuming alcohol and carrying/driving do not mix. Being in an area where others imbibe and the person carrying does not imbibe is about as dangerous as having a designated driver in the bar and serving him/her soda pop.
-
June 16th, 2008 06:41 PM
#12
Member
Array
What's funny is that the United States doesn't have the authority to pass such a bill. State law pre-empts federal law in matters of public safety, under the Constitution of the U.S. The U.S. can regulate those aspects of gun purchases that affect interstate commerce, but they can't preemptively regulate matters relating to possession or safety. They can pass the statute, if they want to, but Michegan can safely ignore it. Any citizen who is aggrieved by reason of the violation of federal law could file suit against the local chief of police (you can't sue the state you live in) in a United States District Court, which is very likely to say, "so what?".
Daniel L. Hawes - 540 347 2430 -
HTTP://www.VirginiaLegalDefense.com
Nothing I say as "user" should be taken as either advertising for attorney services or legal advice. Legal questions should be presented to a competent attorney licensed to practice in the relevant state.
-
June 18th, 2008 04:41 PM
#13
Senior Member
Array
You sound so educated...or at least are good with big words yet you cannot spell MichIgan correctly.....
Better to die on your feet, than to live on your knees.

-
June 19th, 2008 09:02 AM
#14
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Benthic
I agree, getting rid of the 'inspection' would be great.
Out of curiosity, what happens under the current law if your weapon fails the 'inspection'? Does that happen?
Brian
Yes it can flunk the safety inspection, but there is no requirement for what if anything is checked. A friend bought a older model S&W revolver and they checked it out. The hammer would drop in the cocked position if you pushed it a little. He had to have it fixed prior to having it registered. New pistols are checked for the correct serial number.
Les Baer 45
Sig Man
N.R.A. Patron Life Member
M.C.R.G.O.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By carryon in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 59
Last Post: October 2nd, 2012, 11:11 PM
-
By aznav in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Replies: 40
Last Post: February 4th, 2010, 10:06 AM
-
By spartywrx in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 32
Last Post: March 19th, 2009, 11:53 AM
-
By CelticWolf in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 45
Last Post: November 18th, 2007, 04:14 AM
-
By Cupcake in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 4
Last Post: March 29th, 2007, 10:32 PM
Search tags for this page
does a pistol have to be inspected in taylor michigan
, does mi have handgun safety inspections 2011
, does michigan shoot your pistol for safety inspection
, is a pistol inspection required in michigan
, is pistol safety inspection cert req in michigan
, mi pistol inspection change
, mi.gunlaw/safety inspection
, michigan pistol inspection
, michigan pistol safety inspection
, michigan safety inspection
, michigan safety inspection law
, michigan saftey inspection certificate
, michigans pistol inspection requirement
, safety inspected handgun in michigan
, what does a safety inspection of a gun consist of in michigan?