June 30th, 2008 08:29 PM
Who is Heller?
How did his case end up in the Supreme Court? Was hew sponsored by the NRA? Why have we/or I? Not seen him on TV or heard him on the radio? No interviews? What is his background? This was probably one of the most important decisions sense 1973 and I want to say thanks to this man and buy him a drink when in town.
I carry to protect myself and my loved ones from the BG's. Not to solve societies problems. That said: if more carried the deterrent would only have a positive overall effect on those problems.
June 30th, 2008 08:42 PM
The Heller case was conceived, financed, and executed by Robert Levey, a fairly interesting person. No help from NRA or SAF. These links have some data about Heller, but Levey is The Man.
Naples man behind major Supreme Court decision plays as hard as he works : Courts : Naples Daily News
CBS News Video - Top Stories and Video News Clips at CBSNews.com
June 30th, 2008 08:45 PM
Heller is the " survivor " of the original 6 iirc parker plaintiffs. he was the sole party found to have " standing " when the case went to SCOUS . On a personal note he is a 60 year old " Special Policeman " who is armed on the job and brought / joined suit because he was forbidden to be armed at home .
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .
Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.
June 30th, 2008 08:52 PM
Heller himself is a D.C. special policeman who attempted to register his service weapon for private use at home. He was denied and then joined in a suit with several other defendants organized by Mr. Levey to have the gun ban overturned.
There were actually six (I think) defendants in the original suit, headed by a woman named Parker. The District Court dismissed Parker et al vs. D.C.. They appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court, which found in favor of Parker, & al. D.C. then appealed that decision to the Supreme Court. Of all the complainants, only Heller was found to have standing for the appeal, and since D.C. was now the complainant (rather than the respondant), the SCOTUS version of the case became D.C. vs. Heller.
Here's a couple of articles to sum it all up nicely:
“What is a moderate interpretation of [the Constitution]? Halfway between what it says and [...] what you want it to say?” —Justice Antonin Scalia
SIG: P220R SS Elite SAO, P220R SAO, P220R Carry, P226R Navy, P226, P239/.40S&W, P2022/.40S&W; GSR 5", P6.
July 1st, 2008 07:07 AM
Heller was chosen because he tried to register his handgun w/the DC police and was denied. Hence he had, "standing."
Also, I believe he was chosen because he was licensed to carry on the job for DC. It would have been a little harder with John Q Public, who they may have tried to say wasn't qualified with a handgun or doesn't go through proper screening.
"The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree..."
Nunn v. State GA 1848
By BlackPR in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: July 1st, 2008, 01:49 PM
By cdwolf in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: March 17th, 2008, 07:00 AM
By Glock_19 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: March 10th, 2008, 04:51 PM
By tabsr in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: February 6th, 2008, 02:12 AM
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors