Ccrkba Condemns New District ‘emergency’ Gun Rules

This is a discussion on Ccrkba Condemns New District ‘emergency’ Gun Rules within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; NEWS RELEASE BELLEVUE, WA – New rules instituted as part of an emergency ordinance by the District of Columbia City Council appear to “fly in ...

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Ccrkba Condemns New District ‘emergency’ Gun Rules

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array mrreynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    620

    Exclamation Ccrkba Condemns New District ‘emergency’ Gun Rules

    NEWS RELEASE

    BELLEVUE, WA – New rules instituted as part of an emergency ordinance by the District of Columbia City Council appear to “fly in the face” of the Supreme Court’s Heller ruling, and may also violate the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.

    A section of the new ordinance requires that “Each registrant shall keep any firearm in his or her possession unloaded and either disassembled or secured by a trigger lock, gun safe, or similar device.” The rule does not apply to police officers, guns kept in a place of business rather than the home, or “a firearm while it is being used to protect against a reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm to a person within the registrant’s home.” There are also exemptions for guns used outside of the home for “lawful recreational purposes” or guns being transported for “a lawful purpose.”

    “This appears to be in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court’s majority ruling in the District of Columbia v. Heller case,” said CCRKBA Legislative Director Joe Waldron. “The court struck down the city’s trigger lock requirement, and ruled that it is unconstitutional to require that firearms be rendered inoperable at all times in the home.”

    Another alarming requirement, Waldron said, is the rule that people registering handguns “Not appear to suffer from a physical defect which would make it unsafe for him to possess and use a firearm safely and responsibly.”

    “I am wondering,” Waldron observed, “if the persons who dreamed up these outrageous guidelines ever heard of the Americans With Disabilities Act. In their attempt to make owning handguns as difficult and discouraging as possible for residents of the District, the people responsible for this regulation have just insulted millions of disabled Americans, including disabled veterans, who are perfectly capable of owning and using firearms. These people are not subject to the discriminatory whims of some bureaucrat as to their abilities.

    “The city just lost a landmark ruling before the Supreme Court,” Waldron stated, “and already they’re trying to poke that court in the eye. That isn’t only arrogant, it’s foolhardy. Apparently the city can’t wait to find itself back in court.”

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member
    Array Hopyard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Disappeared
    Posts
    11,657
    I have been saying since Heller was announced that the gun owning community is now subject to, and at the mercy of, absolutely lawless and anarchic local civil leaders and legislators who simply have NO INTENTION of following Heller.

    The above post about Bellevue is a great example of what I am talking about---and probably also not consistent with Washington's concealed handgun license law.

    I don't know how it works now, but about 10 years ago my brother in-law got a Washington license simply be walking into the Sheriff's office and requesting one. He was asked why he wanted it, and he answered that he goes fishing or to work at 4 A.M. That was a good enough reason.

    Not that a reason should have been needed from a 40 yo Chief.

  4. #3
    Member Array ryanjensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Fargo, ND
    Posts
    63
    I think the byline in the article is just where the article originated ... all the text of the article references Washington, DC not Bellevue, WA. Sloppy journalism at the very least.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik Condemns Arizona Carry Laws Today
    By LanceORYGUN in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: January 9th, 2011, 10:11 PM
  2. Retired Wisconsin DA Condemns Concealed Carry - Fights Legislation to bring CCW to WI
    By LanceORYGUN in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: January 1st, 2011, 12:13 PM
  3. Ccrkba Suggests Investigation
    By mrreynolds in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 25th, 2008, 05:22 PM
  4. CCRKBA Alert
    By AZG23 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 22nd, 2005, 05:03 PM
  5. CCRKBA Alert
    By AZG23 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 14th, 2005, 09:41 PM