Consider this Thanis...
every single regulation that deals with firearms is considered "reasonable" by someone.
Sarah Brady harps that registration of all firearms is reasonable.
Joe Biden says that a reasonable person, does not need, evil black assault weapons, or anything that resembles them.
Bill Clinton told everyone that reasonable man didn't need any more than 10 rounds in his magazine.
Rudy Guiliani thinks that reasonable people don't need guns for self defense in his city, one of the highest ranking in violent crime in the nation.
Here is another example...
But I'm against CC carry "IN" airports and on a plane. I think there are some reasonable (common sense) regulations.
What is reasonable to you is not to me.
If you knew much about aircraft construction at all, you would understand that a bullet hole, or even several of them will not bring down a plane. In stead, you think that you reasonable regulation will keep weapons off of planes. Sure, thats true for people that obey the law, but someone that is dedicated and willing will always find a way to get around those restrictions so in effect all you have done is guaranteed that everyone in that plane is defenseless.
So when you hear me say I'm pro-reasonable regulation, please consider, what I call reasonable is not the same as anti-gun. Should we let the anti-gun crowd own any phrase that starts with reasonable?
I don't think you are necessarily anti-gun, but it does appear that you argue the 'facts" as you know them from an anti-gun position and I am not the only one here that thinks that.
If your former posts are any indication of your thought process, I think that you have a lot of thinking to do on the issues.
Something else that concerns me. You worry too much about what the anti-gun crowd thinks. Me personally, I don't care what they think. They are so out of touch with reality that they aren't even reasonable enough for me to consider that anything they put out is "reasonable".
If the average person worried or cared about what they thought like you did, there wouldn't be a state in the union that had provisions for concealed weapons, every single gun would be registered for future confiscation, you could only buy one gun a month, your local police chief or mayor or even doctor would have to approve your purchase, you would have to undergo a mental evaluation, you might possibly have to store you arms in a locked vault at a gun club and any ammunition that could penetrate a vest would be illegal, and that would include most of them.
And if you think any in that last paragraph are "extreme" remember that every single one of them was proposed at one time or another as "
reasonable regulation.
Get my drift ?