Health Plan Threatens to Feed Your Gun-related Data Into a Nationl Database

This is a discussion on Health Plan Threatens to Feed Your Gun-related Data Into a Nationl Database within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I think what you and I are concerned about is however a little different than the issue in the OP. There, they were arguing that ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: Health Plan Threatens to Feed Your Gun-related Data Into a Nationl Database

  1. #16
    Moderator
    Array Rock and Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado at 11,650'
    Posts
    12,256

    Wink

    I think what you and I are concerned about is however a little different than the issue in the OP.
    There, they were arguing that if you tell your doc you have guns in your home "the government" will know, and then who knows where that will lead.
    I saw the link, what with Doctors questions (which I would leave blank or not answer, if ever asked) and the dbase. Granted, a little Tin Hat......But the funded legislation could be used as the first step to gathering data that is extraneous to it's stated purpose (we've never seen that before, eh?).

    I don't know that they can "manage" all of the relevant medical data in a meaningful manner yet, let alone meaningless data.

    For the dbase to be useful, and save money, it has to link diagnosis, treatments and outcomes, with a bazillion parameters. Hard to see where guns rank in that snake-orgy of data.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    VIP Member Array HKinNY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nassau, NY(Long Island)
    Posts
    2,855
    Done.

  4. #18
    VIP Member
    Array Hopyard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Disappeared
    Posts
    11,602

    computerized medical records

    Quote Originally Posted by Rock and Glock View Post

    I don't know that they can "manage" all of the relevant medical data in a meaningful manner yet, let alone meaningless data.

    For the dbase to be useful, and save money, it has to link diagnosis, treatments and outcomes, with a bazillion parameters. Hard to see where guns rank in that snake-orgy of data.
    I agree with what you wrote. There is also a different issue. How many times when we are asked to provide info with yes-no answers, or multiple choice answers, are we pigeonholed into a category that isn't quite precise for our situation. Will a dbase draw distinctions between type of guns owned? Will it draw distinctions between LEs owning guns and CCW license holders? It is doubtful to me that these distinctions will find their way into a dbase and thus there will be no usable epidemiological information to be gleaned.

    I was at a docs a few years back and the guy was using a hand held data device which rather obviously was also guiding him and suggesting things to ask. At one point he sort of got frustrated with it because my rather bad (at the time) respiratory symptoms weren't fitting the little categories nicely. It didn't have check boxes for what he wanted to record in my file.

    Fortunately, the man had practiced medicine for 35 years and the computer didn't influence his decisions about going ahead and taking x-rays (needed) and treating me appropriately. But you could sure sense the frustration. Will computerized records and data gathering cause diagnostic and treatment problems which are now unforeseeable? You bet.

    I like tech stuff. I'm just uncomfortable that this transition is going to work well.

  5. #19
    VIP Member Array Tom G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,375
    this is scary.

  6. #20
    New Member Array glockblocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    3

    Hmmm...phishing for MEMBERS?

    Has anyone noticed the amount of posts from "ACTION GROUPS" like GOA and NRA, and how they seem to be feeding most of the "ammo shortage" and "hide your gun" posts online?

    I understand part of their job is to inform, but some of the recent news items are so over the top and skewed that I find it hard to believe my brethren anymore. I am a gun owner, but not stupid or crazy enough to think there is not SOME self interest in these sites and their "news."

    If you lie about the fact that the goverment is FORCING us to pay $10,000 for Gov't insurance (which is not accurate and obvious to anyone who can read the actual bill or more reputable news), the rest of your post is probably BS, too.

  7. #21
    Member Array CPTMO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Mississippi
    Posts
    165
    Done
    The best preventative medicine is superior fire power.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Tube feed or magazine feed--rimfire rounds
    By SleepingZ in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: March 7th, 2010, 11:01 PM
  2. I think I figured out the new administrations health plan.
    By Pure Kustom in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: June 30th, 2009, 02:56 AM
  3. Bad: 11 Year Old WV gal threatens with gun
    By JoJoGunn in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: May 12th, 2009, 08:32 PM
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: March 18th, 2009, 11:31 AM
  5. Juvenile threatens you???
    By APachon in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: February 24th, 2005, 09:03 PM