LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksGood news NC residents.
North Carolina General Assembly - House Bill 1131 Information/History (2009-2010 Session)
Now we need to get our reps behind this!
This is a discussion on NC Castle Doctrine introduced 6 April 09 within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Good news NC residents. North Carolina General Assembly - House Bill 1131 Information/History (2009-2010 Session) Now we need to get our reps behind this!...
Array
NC Castle Doctrine introduced 6 April 09
Good news NC residents.
North Carolina General Assembly - House Bill 1131 Information/History (2009-2010 Session)
Now we need to get our reps behind this!
"Without fear there can be no Courage!"
Array
Array
Great!
Duty, Honor, Country...MEDIC!!!
¡Cuánto duele crecer, cuan hondo es el dolor de alzarse en puntillas y observar con temblores de angustia, esa cosa tremenda, que es la vida del hombre! - René Marqués
Array
yeah good luck michigan just passed one a few years ago and they did a good job with it
NRA sence 2003 Colt defender Taurus .357 mag
Taurus tcp x box gamer tag mathewsman
Castle Doctrine's are important in the elimination of 'suits' brought about by the dirtbag or his family seeking $$$ because of scumbag misfortune...
I would assume that this one has that as part of its wording?
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
Array
Originally Posted by retsupt99
"§ 14-474. Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force.
(a) A person who uses force as permitted in G.S. 14-471, 14-472, or 14-473 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in G.S. 14-470, who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer.
(b) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (a) of this section, but the agency shall not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful.
(c) The court shall award reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (a) of this section.
Yup I think they got the wording in.
"Without fear there can be no Courage!"
Array
I hope that they pass this bill. I wish they would propose something similar to this here in Nevada. We don't have a "Castle Doctrine" here. It would be a great asset to us who have to actually need it in the case of a home invasion.
"Gun control is being able to hit your target."
Glock 26
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
