The check is in the mail....

The check is in the mail....

This is a discussion on The check is in the mail.... within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Reality check that is... Yes this is review but it is now closer than you think. Shamelessly borrowed from elsewhere... You're sound asleep when you ...

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The check is in the mail....

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Sheldon J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek, Mi.
    Posts
    2,286

    Exclamation The check is in the mail....

    Reality check that is...

    Yes this is review but it is now closer than you think. Shamelessly borrowed from elsewhere...


    You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.



    One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.




    In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few That are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.



    "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.



    "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."



    The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.



    Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.



    A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.



    The judge sentences you to life in prison.



    This case really happened!

    On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.

    How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire ?


    It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.


    Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.



    Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987.. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed Man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.



    The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)



    Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.



    For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, Sealed the fate of the few sidearm still owned by private citizens.



    During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.



    Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."



    All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.



    When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.


    How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.


    Sound familiar?


    WAKE UP AMERICA ; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.


    "..It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
    --Samuel Adams
    "The sword dose not cause the murder, and the maker of the sword dose not bear sin" Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac 11th century


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array matiki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.W.
    Posts
    2,917
    Your basic summary:

    BBC NEWS | UK | England | Norfolk | Tony Martin: Crime and controversy

    Good post-conviction summary of events:

    EDP24 News - Tony Martin file

    I think things might have gone differently for Martin if he hadn't shot them both as they fled.
    "Wise people learn when they can; fools learn when they must." - The Duke of Wellington

  3. #3
    Ex Member Array PNUT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    913
    Burglar sues

    The court found in Martin's favour and in October 2001 his offence was downgraded to manslaughter and his sentence reduced to five years.

    Hall and stairs inside Martin's house
    Martin's appeal lawyers said he was like a child

    But the controversy did not end there.

    Fearon, who had more than 30 criminal convictions, is now trying to sue Martin for damages as a result of being shot.

    He has asked for a reported 15,000 for loss of earnings, claiming he can no longer enjoy sex or bear to see shootings on television.

    Fearon is himself currently in jail, after being convicted in February of this year on drugs charges and jailed for 18 months.


    England is a mess, the people have the right to have no rights......freedom of speech no longer exists unless you're an Islamic extremist then you can say what you want.
    Criminals get a pass on everything.

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Antifreeze-check, wiper blades-check, ammo?
    By BuckeyeEric in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: October 6th, 2009, 06:29 PM
  2. Just got the CCW in the mail.
    By tougeep3 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: July 30th, 2009, 04:30 PM
  3. What do you check before and after? (I now do magazine seat check)
    By stgdz in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: November 7th, 2007, 02:31 AM
  4. Is it illegal to mail gun PARTS in the mail?
    By kavity in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: July 4th, 2007, 09:02 AM
  5. How does the NICS check differ from the Check to get your Handgun Permit?
    By IndianaJones in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: September 18th, 2006, 09:33 PM