MO thinking before/after CCW (KC Star article)

This is a discussion on MO thinking before/after CCW (KC Star article) within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Didn't want to hijack Ti Carry's thread on the KC Star article dealing with Kansas. This is just something that happened to my wife and ...

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: MO thinking before/after CCW (KC Star article)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array David III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sturgeon, MO
    Posts
    810

    MO thinking before/after CCW (KC Star article)

    Didn't want to hijack Ti Carry's thread on the KC Star article dealing with Kansas. This is just something that happened to my wife and I here in Missouri. An interesting sidebar to liberal or anti-ccw thinking.

    My wife, Lesa, was especially outspoken about concealed carry (pro, of course) before the public vote here. We went to all kinds of places so she could talk to people. She is self-employed - cleans houses - so she makes bank deposits a couple times a week and was always worried that someone would figure out her schedule and rob her. Here, we could not keep a loaded gun in a vehicle unless it was in plain sight.... not good if you want to keep vehicle glass.

    Anyway, a liberal friend of ours would constantly go on about how terrible it would be to have CCW, etc. My wife asked her "so, if you're getting raped, you don't want to defend yourself?"
    She says "no, I couldn't hurt anyone, no matter what."

    CCW gets voted down, time passes, legislature gets it through.. you all know the story. A couple years pass.
    Same liberal girl is talking at a party and the subject of rape/assault comes up. The girl says "well if I'm with Lesa, she'll protect me" -

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array havegunjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    2,206
    Your wife should tell her, you voted against CC, you are on your own. Typical liberal who wants everyone else to protect them but votes against the means to do it.
    DEMOCRACY IS TWO WOLVES AND A LAMB VOTING ON WHAT TO HAVE FOR LUNCH. LIBERTY IS A WELL ARMED LAMB CONtestING THE VOTE.

    Certified Instructor for Minnesota Carry Permit
    NRA Pistol and Personal Protection Insrtuctor
    Utah Permit Certified Instructor

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array Ti Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Under Cover
    Posts
    2,035
    David, That is the sad truth! Expecting other people (your wife) to protect them is just ludicrous.

    Lesa's friend better hope Lesa is with her 24/7/365 to protect her then. Your wife should start charging them for protection.


    Ti.
    Train and train hard, you might not get a second chance to make a first impression!

    I vote for Monica Lewinsky's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife for President.....Not!

  5. #4
    Senior Member Array David III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sturgeon, MO
    Posts
    810
    Ti - from what I understand, we couldn't protect her if we wanted to. The piece of a ruling I was quoted went something like - if protecting a non-family member, we cannot use any more force than we know they would use in the same situation. That girl said no force at all, so we can't help her.
    Not sure if this is true, but I heard if from a prosecuting attorney who is also pro-gun.

  6. #5
    VIP Member Array Ti Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Under Cover
    Posts
    2,035
    Are you talking about a Missouri statute that says this?

    From what I understand you can absolutely protect someone that is in trouble, say being raped or attempting to muder another. That is the first time I have heard of that one.

    Can you explain further and possibly show the statute saying this?


    Ti.
    Last edited by Ti Carry; March 17th, 2006 at 06:14 PM.
    Train and train hard, you might not get a second chance to make a first impression!

    I vote for Monica Lewinsky's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife for President.....Not!

  7. #6
    VIP Member
    Array Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Posts
    5,050
    It's not would, it's could. In other words if the person is in fear of serious bodily harm or death they could use deadly force to protect themselves. This means that you could also. A subtlety of the words, but important.

    My problem with defending someone else, is that they may testify that they were not in fear of serious harm or death, which can put me in a bit of a ringer. So it may come down to me saying I believed that they were in fear of serious bodily harm or death and them saying they weren't. Judge or jury gets to sort it out and you are at the mercy of people who will have days or weeks to decide what you had to decide in seconds or less.

    -Scott-

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array David III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sturgeon, MO
    Posts
    810
    Ti - no, I can't -- but thanks to this forum, Scott just did - Thanks! Could. That makes sense.
    I managed to take my own thread off topic.....
    but, over the past hour or so, I've thought of a couple other people I know who were very much against CCW - and now on several occasions I've heard them say that they feel better if I'm around when we're going someplace. I will never figure out that mindset, and I guess that's a good thing.
    I won't have to open my door and say "Baa..."

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array Ti Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Under Cover
    Posts
    2,035
    O.k. would or could, whatever. That is not waht David was touching on IMO.

    This is what is confusing me.

    David wrote,
    if protecting a non-family member, we cannot use any more force than we know they would use in the same situation. That girl said no force at all, so we can't help her.

    Are we saying this is a law or just the best thing to do?


    Ti.
    Train and train hard, you might not get a second chance to make a first impression!

    I vote for Monica Lewinsky's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife for President.....Not!

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: February 16th, 2011, 11:50 AM
  2. Star m43 9mm
    By musicman in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 28th, 2010, 11:10 AM
  3. Star PD?
    By ev239 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 21st, 2008, 10:22 PM
  4. Kansas City Star CCW Article!
    By Ti Carry in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 17th, 2006, 02:56 PM
  5. 4 Star Impostor
    By glock21guy in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: March 6th, 2006, 03:23 PM

Search tags for this page

kansas city star article conceal carry.

,

kansas city star article on missouri ccw

,

kc star article on new law past in missouri

,

missouri ccw

Click on a term to search for related topics.