Oregon University System on the attack

Oregon University System on the attack

This is a discussion on Oregon University System on the attack within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; From The Oregon Firearms Federation: OFF As you know, the Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation has filed a lawsuit against the Oregon University System for attempting ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Oregon University System on the attack

  1. #1
    Distinguished Member
    Array Xader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,564

    Exclamation Oregon University System on the attack

    From The Oregon Firearms Federation:

    OFF

    As you know, the Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation has filed a lawsuit against the Oregon University System for attempting to enforce illegal anti-gun rules.

    Just as in the Medford School District, which threatened a teacher there for having a CHL, the Oregon University System has draconian anti-gun regulations that Oregon law does not allow them to adopt.

    But, not content to wait until the courts rule on either case, OUS has sent out their hired hack, Neil Bryant, to try to convince the legislature to write new rules to strip license holders of their ability to be on University property.

    Bryant was the Chair of the Senate Judiciary in 1999. He was one of the driving forces behind an attempt to ram through legislation to end private transfers at gun shows. This bill was actually supported by a "pro-gun" state group back then, and it was ignored by the NRA. OFF opposed it and it was defeated by one vote.

    Now Bryant is back as a lobbyist trying to attack the rights of the most law-abiding people in the state, concealed handgun license holders.

    It's interesting to note that while this hearing was a joint session of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, the Chair of the House Committee, Jeff Barker, wanted no part of it. So he dismissed his committee when this issue came up. Only ultra-liberal House Rep Jefferson Smith stayed in the room. Smith commented that Oregon might be "better off" with a patchwork of different rules and laws in different places, a nightmare our "preemption" statute was passed to address.

    Bryant told the Committee that college students should not be allowed to be on campus with lawfully owned guns because they drink too much. He asked what would happen if a bunch of drunken college students decided to "pass a gun around." He wondered aloud about what armed students would do if they "broke up with their girlfriend" or were "angry at a professor."

    At no point did Bryant actually give an example of any problems on any college campuses. At no point did Bryant explain why these same students could be trusted off campus. But he did mention our lawsuits as the reason he was asking for new restrictions. (We can only conclude that the Oregon University System is convinced they will lose.)

    Bryant also stated in the hearing that Jeff Maxwell, the Western Oregon University student who was unlawfully arrested for having a handgun on campus, was given a "public hearing." As many of you know, that's untrue. Maxwell was "tried" by a kangaroo court of students in a closed session where even Jeff's family was denied access.

    Bryant suggested, and the Senate Committee agreed to the creation of a "work group" to try to come up with new laws to restrict gun rights on college property.

    Bryant suggested that the group consist of legislators, school board members, officials from K-12 schools, district attorneys, campus security, police and sheriffs. Almost as an afterthought he said a representative from "gun rights group" should perhaps be invited. At that suggestion, Senator Susanne Bonamici said that if a pro-gun representative was included, she wanted someone from an anti-gun group like Ceasefire Oregon. (As if the deck were not stacked enough.) Neither Bryant nor any member of the committee suggested having any representation from student organizations.

    There is no question that the anti-gun establishment is running scared and is working overtime to find a way to disarm license holders. It is essential that we act before this misguided movement can pick up steam.

    Both the attempted gutting of SB 603 and the attack on gun rights on college property will likely be considered at the February "special session." Please contact the Senate Judiciary Committee and let them know that you will not stand for any attacks on your rights.

    Chair Floyd Prozanski is the person who most needs to hear from you. It was he who agreed to put together the "work group" being assembled to craft these new restrictions.

    If you are a student, or will be in the future, or if you have a child or grandchild who is a student, it is critical that Prozanski hear your voice. Remember, this is NOT just about colleges. If these efforts are successful, a parent with a CHL will not be allowed to pick up a child at school while in possession of a self defense firearm. Tell Prozanski that you want to be represented at this "work group." (You may even want to serve on it yourself.) This group will be forming immediately. You MUST act right away. A sample e-mail and contact info for Senator Prozanski follows:

    Capitol Address:
    900 Court St. NE, S-417
    Salem, OR 97301
    Capitol Phone:
    503-986-1704
    District Address:
    PO Box 11511
    Eugene, OR 97440
    District Phone:
    541-342-2447

    sen.floydprozanski@state.or.us


  2. #2
    Member Array greenLED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beaver Nation
    Posts
    162
    Xader, saw your post over at OCC - good job spreading the word!
    If handguns cause crime, mine are deffective - Ted Nugent

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array dnowell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    587
    As a student and Oregon resident, I wrote him!

  4. #4
    Distinguished Member
    Array Xader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by greenLED View Post
    Xader, saw your post over at OCC - good job spreading the word!
    There are also active posts on this at USA Carry and OCDO

  5. #5
    Member Array greenLED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beaver Nation
    Posts
    162
    I "made some new friends" back when I was in school because of a related issue, so I appreciate all the efforts to make the OUS comply with the law, not their interpretation of what it may be.
    If handguns cause crime, mine are deffective - Ted Nugent

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. University security officers "on leave" after exposing university's anti-gun policy
    By cyberdogg in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: January 15th, 2011, 09:05 PM
  2. Oregon members--open vehicle carry in Oregon?
    By Chaplain Scott in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: June 22nd, 2009, 07:06 PM
  3. University of Knoxville with a gun.
    By Magilla82ABN in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 24th, 2008, 10:37 PM
  4. Gun at University
    By alyehoud in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 31st, 2007, 03:15 PM
  5. Airborne Biological Alarm & Attack System
    By Miggy in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 16th, 2006, 11:10 PM

Search tags for this page

floyd prozanski anti second amendment
,
open lawsuits against oregon university system
,

oregon university system concealed carry

,
wester oregon university gun lawsuit
Click on a term to search for related topics.