Missouri Residents BE ADVISED!!!

This is a discussion on Missouri Residents BE ADVISED!!! within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Please read the following letter I have drafted and am sending to my state legislators, the Governor, and the Attorney General (I'll edit slightly for ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Missouri Residents BE ADVISED!!!

  1. #1
    Member Array HardCorps79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    156

    Missouri Residents BE ADVISED!!!

    Please read the following letter I have drafted and am sending to my state legislators, the Governor, and the Attorney General (I'll edit slightly for the latter two). It will tell you everything you need to know. This is CRITICAL!!! I'm also contacting the NRA to drum up awareness and support.

    Please feel free to cut and paste, or write your own version and send it to the appropriate people
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    Honorable Mr. _________,

    On 17 January, 2009, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled in the case of Missouri vs. John L. Richard, that RSMo 571.030.1(5) is not unconstitutional thus opening up the potential for serious infringement on the liberties of literally hundreds of thousands of Missouri firearms owners.

    RSMO 571.030.1(5) states that “A person commits the crime of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly possesses or discharges a firearm or projectile weapon while intoxicated.”

    Under RSMO 571.030.7, Unlawful use of weapons is a class D felony.

    By this wording, any person in Missouri who has a firearm in their home and becomes intoxicated, whether by alcohol or prescription drugs, could be charged and convicted as a felon.

    It is understood that alcohol and firearms do not mix well and present the potential for a fair amount of damage to public safety. However, within a person’s own home and under reasonable circumstances, the possibility of public endangerment is mitigated and must be overruled by our utmost commitment to preserve the right of security and privacy in our persons and possessions.

    Consider that a person in their home, who otherwise is in legal possession of a firearm, and becomes otherwise legally intoxicated, could be the victim of home invasion, burglary or arson. Essentially, due to the overly broad interpretation of the statute as currently written, a person in their own home, having a few drinks, gives up their right to protect their own person, and their family by use of a firearm.

    Of even more concern is that under the current statute, any person in Missouri who owns a firearm, who becomes intoxicated in their own home becomes a felon. This is patently absurd!

    Numerous other states have recognized this potentiality and have constructed less vaguely worded statutes that both provide for the public safety, and yet preserve the rights of privacy and personal security.

    Please consider drafting and/or sponsoring legislation to the aforementioned effect of preserving the civil rights of your constituency. An example may be an exception such as:

    “Except that RSMO 571.030.1(5) shall not apply to persons in their own domicile, or other private property where they are legally allowed to be, provided the person may otherwise legally possess a firearm; or when a person displays or discharges a firearm in a manner justifiable by RSMO 563 in defense of self or others, and that such possession or discharge is not in violation of any other section of Chapters 571 and 563.”

    Respectfully Submitted,

    Name
    NRA Certified Instructor
    xxxx xxxxx Ave
    xxxxxx, MO
    (xxx)-xxx-xxxx

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (FYI, RSMO 563 is the chapter of Missouri law which covers justifiable use of force.)

    Missouri residents and NRA members, let's make this happen!
    NRA Certified Instructor (6 years)
    Former LEO/DOD Contractor
    Active Duty Marine (Martial Arts Instructor)
    Glock 17, Kel-Tec P-11, S&W Model 60, various rifles

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array Stevew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    3,400
    Wow that is scary. The number of law abiding folks that would have been over .08 and had a firearm in the house will be very high.
    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around laws. Plato

  4. #3
    Senior Member Array 2edgesword's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    653
    While I understand the intent of this legislation (responsible use of a firearm) the fact that you have had a few drinks doesn't negate your right of self-defense. If you do something irresponsible with a firearm, intoxicated or not, you should be held responsibility. But if the use of your firearm was responsible the fact that you were drunk shouldn't have a bearing on whether you are charged with a crime.
    Martial Blade Concepts, Jiu-Jitsu & Eskrima NRA, GOA, NYSRPA, LIF, Old Bethpage Rifle & Pistol Club

  5. #4
    Member Array raytracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevew View Post
    Wow that is scary. The number of law abiding folks that would have been over .08 and had a firearm in the house will be very high.
    Keep in mind that 571.030 does not set a legal definition for "intoxicated" like that for DUI - .08% BAC.

    Joe

  6. #5
    VIP Member
    Array oneshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    +42.893612,-082.710236 , Mi.
    Posts
    8,025
    What are these retards gonna come up with next,,,

    If you are legally intoxicated you cannot give your baby a bath
    If you are le "" """ "" use a power lawn mower to cut your grass
    If you "" """ """ " Blah Blah Blahhhhh

    Whats the world coming to for crying out loud

    See below

    "If you put the government in charge of the desert, there would be a sand shortage within ten years." - A very wise man
    If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.

    Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British, He shot them!

    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." -- Ernest Benn

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. OH and MI residents, I need help
    By GoBigOrange in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 11th, 2010, 09:57 PM
  2. Harris Co, TX Residents and Former Residents
    By ErnieNWillis in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2009, 09:06 PM
  3. Bare naked metal bobtail pics. Viewer Discretion is Advised!
    By ontarget1911 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: September 12th, 2008, 03:58 PM
  4. Be advised what your kids are being taught in public school about handgun violence.
    By S.D. in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: February 26th, 2008, 09:55 PM
  5. Missouri residents
    By gen3monte in forum Member Meeting Place
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 23rd, 2007, 09:14 PM

Search tags for this page

571.030
,
571.030 missouri
,

fel unlaw use wea rsmo 571.030

,

felony d rsmo 571.030

,

felony d rsmo: 571.030

,

missouri 571.030

,
missouri criminal code 571.030
,
missouri rsmo 563
,
missouri statutes 571.030
,

rsmo 563

,
rsmo 571
,

rsmo 571.030

Click on a term to search for related topics.