GOOD: Reasonable Editorial in the Richmond TD

GOOD: Reasonable Editorial in the Richmond TD

This is a discussion on GOOD: Reasonable Editorial in the Richmond TD within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; When I see something like this in the Roanoke Times and/or the Virginian Pilot , I'll know that the worm has turned. Repeal? | Richmond ...

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: GOOD: Reasonable Editorial in the Richmond TD

  1. #1
    VIP Member
    Array DaveH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Posts
    5,036

    Thumbs up GOOD: Reasonable Editorial in the Richmond TD

    When I see something like this in the Roanoke Times and/or the Virginian Pilot , I'll know that the worm has turned.

    Repeal? | Richmond Times-Dispatch

    Repeal?
    By Staff Reports
    Published: February 17, 2010

    Virginia's one-gun-a-month law worked. The bipartisan measure -- its passage was a product of pressure from Democrat Doug Wilder and Republican Richard Cullen, then U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia -- helped impair the drugs-for-guns circuit up and down the East Coast.

    But some members of the General Assembly, such as Del. Scott Lingamfelter, want to repeal the law. They say that it has served its purpose, that it has been supplanted by instant background checks and related measures. They have a point.

    One-gun-a-month served a practical function. But it also compromised important principles by infringing on the right to bear arms enshrined in the Constitution. Like Del. Joe Morrissey, who asked whether the law truly inconviences anyone, advocates of the measure stress that one gun a month should be enough for anyone; no one "needs" to buy more than that. Perhaps. On the other hand, rights are not supposed to be constrained by what some people think other people need. It could be argued that newspapers do not need to publish more than once a week, that nobody needs to buy more than two books a month, that the faithful do not need to attend church more than twice a year, or that no woman should need more than one abortion in her lifetime. Those are not decisions government should make.

    We supported one-gun-a-month in 1993. But we have long argued that statutes and programs should not have eternal life. Otherwise America will gradually be smothered by relics such as the mohair subsidy, the national helium reserve, and "temporary" taxes dating back to the War of 1812. Now is as good a time as any to take a fresh look at one-gun-a-month. Careful consideration may lead to the conclusion that repeal is warranted -- and perhaps even overdue.
    Μολὼν λαβέ

    I'm just one root in a grassroots organization. No one should assume that I speak for the VCDL.

    I am neither an attorney-at-law nor I do play one on television or on the internet. No one should assumes my opinion is legal advice.

    Veni, Vidi, Velcro


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array archer51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    21,846
    Now if only they'd do a similar editorial in favor of CC in restaurants!
    Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.

    USAF Retired
    NRA Life Member

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Array StevePVB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    1,100
    Good point on the law not truly inconveniencing anyone, but nice comparison to 2 books per month. No different than free speech being limited to 500 words per month.

    Even though none of could afford more than one a month, every month, I'm sure many of us have bought more than 1 in a month at some point. Somehow, that didn't translate into drug-fueled gun trade.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Good Washington Time Editorial
    By DaveH in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: July 4th, 2010, 10:36 PM
  2. Good LTE Richmond Times Dispatch
    By DaveH in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 12th, 2010, 12:35 AM
  3. Good editorial in the Washington Times of all places...
    By MinistrMalic in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: January 23rd, 2010, 06:09 PM
  4. GOOD: Fatal Shooting Ruled Self-Defense - Richmond, Va
    By CT-Mike in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 15th, 2009, 03:54 PM
  5. Good Price for .357SIG Gold Dots in Richmond, VA area
    By p8riot in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 5th, 2006, 09:16 PM