Another Starbucks Poll to hit - Page 2

Another Starbucks Poll to hit

This is a discussion on Another Starbucks Poll to hit within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Voted. Results were 24% keep out, 75% guns welcome, 1% too scared to state an opinion...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Another Starbucks Poll to hit

  1. #16
    Senior Member Array jeephipwr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Triangle, NC
    Posts
    612
    Voted. Results were 24% keep out, 75% guns welcome, 1% too scared to state an opinion


  2. #17
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,884
    The America On Line POLL directly related to an AOL StarBucks News Article.


    Question:
    What do you think about laws that allow people to carry guns in public?

    I support them 74%
    I oppose them 22%
    Undecided 4%

    Total Votes: 14,998

  3. #18
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,884

    Here Is The AOL Article Posted This Morning

    Facing Gun Issue, Starbucks Throws Up Its Hands
    Richard C. Paddock San Francisco Correspondent

    SAN FRANCISCO (March 3) -- The Starbucks coffee chain announced today that it will continue letting customers openly wear unloaded handguns in its coffee shops.

    At the same time, the company asked members of the "open carry" gun movement and their opponents to refrain from putting Starbucks in the firing line of the national debate over the right to bear arms.

    "The political, policy and legal debates around these issues belong in the legislatures and courts, not in our stores," the Seattle-based company said in a statement released to the media.

    Forty-three states allow citizens to wear an unloaded handgun in public.

    The informal open-carry movement apparently originated in Virginia several years ago but has come to unlikely prominence in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    In recent months, Bay Area gun advocates have staged frequent open-carry "meet-ups" at Starbucks coffee shops and other restaurants. Some of the events have attracted dozens of men and women wearing handguns.

    Last weekend, about 20 members of the movement -- 12 of them sporting guns -- came to Presidio National Park in San Francisco to pick up trash at scenic Baker Beach.

    "We decided to do a serious activity while educating the public about responsible firearm ownership," said Jon Schwartz, a leader of the informal movement. He was wearing a Smith & Wesson .45-caliber automatic on his left hip.

    "It's not just law enforcement and criminals that have guns but law-abiding citizens as well," he said.

    Schwartz, like other participants in open-carry events, was carrying two magazines on his belt with the maximum 10 bullets each. It takes about two seconds for him to load his weapon.

    In California, much of the open-carry movement is focused on protesting county rules that sharply restrict the number of concealed weapon permits that are issued.


    Bill Shelbrick, who also took part in the beach cleanup, said many of the open-carry advocates are former police officers and members of the military who believe they can protect themselves and the people around them by carrying weapons.

    For Shelbrick, an electrician who said he once worked as a police officer in a Pennsylvania township, wearing his Ruger 9 mm automatic is an attempt to show the public that law-abiding citizens can go around armed.

    "It's my right and I want to exercise my right," he said. "I think everybody should. We are not the gun-toting crazies that anti-gun organizations make us out to be."

    The sight of armed men drinking a venti latte at a Starbucks or dining out at a restaurant can be unsettling for some customers.

    Police are frequently called to the scene of open-carry events, where they typically check to make sure all weapons are unloaded and in plain sight.

    For business owners, open-carry events can create a dilemma. Employees risk offending armed customers by asking them to leave. But other patrons might walk out because of the presence of weapons.

    Peet's Coffee & Tea and California Pizza Kitchen have banned customers from wearing handguns on their premises. But Starbucks has allowed the practice to continue in the states where open carry is legal.


    Richard C. Paddock for AOL
    Jon Schwartz, a leader in the movement to allow people to carry guns in public, picks up trash in San Francisco during a recent open-carry event. He was wearing a handgun on his left hip. He said such events promote responsible firearms ownership.

    As a result, Starbucks has come under fire from gun-control advocates, particularly the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which has urged the chain to ban guns on its premises.

    "Tell Starbucks: Espresso Shots, Not Gunshots," the group says on its Web site. "The practice of packing heat in places like Starbucks is intimidating and could be potentially dangerous to our families and communities -- and it must be stopped."

    Last month, the Brady campaign sent a letter to Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz urging him to reverse the company's policy. The campaign noted that three Starbucks employees were shot and killed at a Washington, D.C., outlet in 1997 during a robbery attempt.

    "These gatherings of armed individuals have provoked a strong and adverse reaction from members of the public who are appalled that coffee shops and restaurants would allow guns on their premises," the letter said.

    Starbucks did not cite the Brady Campaign by name in its statement today, but appeared to be responding to the anti-gun group.

    "We recognize that there is significant and genuine passion surrounding the issue of open-carry weapons laws," the company said. "Advocacy groups from both sides of this issue have chosen to use Starbucks as a way to draw attention to their positions."

    The company noted that if it prohibited weapons in its shop, its employees would have to ask law-abiding citizens to leave, placing them in "an unfair and potentially unsafe position." The statement also said the company is "extremely sensitive to the issue of gun violence in our society" but believes "that supporting local laws is the right way for us to ensure a safe environment for both partners and customers."

    Whether Starbucks' attempt to disassociate itself from the issue will work remains to be seen.

    "I can't speak for everybody, but I might think twice about having a large-scale event at Starbucks," said Schwartz, the Bay Area open-carry advocate. "But I wouldn't think twice about taking myself and my family and meeting a couple of friends for a great cup of coffee while participating in unloaded open carry."

  4. #19
    VIP Member Array JDE101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    6,813
    I just voted and it is 75/24/1. Soon as I get off the computer I think I'll go get a large mocha from the local Starbucks.

    Reading the article, I found it interesting that some of the open carry states require the gun to be "unloaded"!!! What the heck good is an UNLOADED gun! A very expensive club or throwing object! Or is it just in "the land of fruits and nuts" that it must be unloaded?
    Live to ride, ride to live. Harley Road King And keep a .45 handy Kimber Custom TLE II

  5. #20
    Member Array TacticalSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    PWN
    Posts
    50
    I fixed the picture in the story...



    "Laws can't control the lawless"

    Christian Gun Owner

  6. #21
    Distinguished Member Array lacrosse50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    1,283
    Still 75/24/1.
    The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.
    -Herbert Spencer

    NRA Life Member

  7. #22
    VIP Member Array paramedic70002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Franklin, VA
    Posts
    5,156
    What's important here, if you read between the lines of Starbucks' statement, is that OCers need to practice some restraint and try to blend in. If there continues to be demonstrations and such by OC groups, they might revisit their policy. OTOH I think they are well annoyed by Brady et al and are enjoying telling them to shove off.
    "Each worker carried his sword strapped to his side." Nehemiah 4:18

    Guns Save Lives. Paramedics Save Lives. But...
    Paramedics With Guns Scare People!

  8. #23
    VIP Member Array SIGguy229's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Kommie-fornia-stan
    Posts
    7,101
    Another photo shows someone OCing....but wearing RealTree camoflage...nothing like propogating the stereotype by the media.
    Magazine <> clip - know the difference

    martyr is a fancy name for crappy fighter
    You have never lived until you have almost died. For those that have fought for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. OC and Starbucks on CBS news
    By chiefjason in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: March 8th, 2010, 01:16 PM
  2. I got my Starbucks today... Did you?
    By NC Buckeye in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: February 23rd, 2010, 01:05 PM
  3. Starbucks incident...
    By wolfshead in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: September 14th, 2009, 12:06 PM
  4. OC incident at Starbucks...
    By wolfshead in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: July 5th, 2009, 06:48 PM
  5. Starbucks
    By Texas Yankee in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: February 13th, 2007, 11:25 PM