View Single Post
Old February 18th, 2009, 11:40 AM   #143
Kerbouchard
VIP Member
 
Kerbouchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,895
Kerbouchard is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by schonbej View Post
I'm a retired Navy Combat Systems engineer with small arms experience and it appears to me (from studying the LCP schematics) that the Ruger LCP recall is based on the possibility that the firing pin is free-floating and therefore it is possible that if dropped from sufficient height on the muzzle, the inertia of the firing pin could strike the primer with sufficient force to cause the LCP to fire. My son and I each have a 370 prefix LCP and have received return packages from Ruger but are now wondering if a modification really makes sense. This issue is not without precedent in handguns (I believe (know) that it was an issue with the 1911 (Gov't and pre-series 80 Colt comm'l) pistols as well as many others). Common sense handling would be in order as always and we may just be "pole vaulting over mouse turds" on this issue. I assume this recall will install some sort of firing pin block but what does that do to reliability, trigger pull, etc? Has anyone had the recall installed and did a "before and after" test? Personally, I'm not sure that this recall is really necessary (I like my LCP just as it is!).
NRA Life Member
I just got my LCP back. I will probably sell it as soon as I get the 'pinky extension', but we'll see.

The only part of the recall that is actually worth it is the larger slide lock.
__________________
There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil.

http://miscmusings.townhall.com/

Who is John Galt?
Kerbouchard is offline   Reply With Quote