View Single Post
Old July 2nd, 2009, 11:18 AM   #12
falcon1
VIP Member
 
falcon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,807
falcon1 is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgg9 View Post
The key thing with these online reviews is to look at WHY those that panned it, did so. Some of course are just frivolous -- "it's too thick" -- IOW they didn't know it's a gun belt. But a lot of the reviewers are pointing out that the main snaps that hold the buckle on are cheap and come apart easily. Better belts use Chicago Screws. This belt uses something much flimsier, apparently. Most buyers won't notice that if nothing goes wrong, but a fair percentage did.
Yes, noticed the snaps issue when some said the buckle was poor, but could be replaced with another since the belts used snaps. Wear was also an issue, evidently....
__________________
If the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.--Candidus (in the Boston Gazette, 20 January 1772)
falcon1 is offline   Reply With Quote