Quote:
Originally Posted by ibesarcasm
Can I just interject into this a quick thought?
We are trying to battle anti gun legislation, by anti gun opponents who say we do not need "assault" rifles. And I believe they are 100% correct..... we, as responsable gun owners, and citizens do not need "assault" weaponry of any type!
However, I refuse to give up my "anti-assault" AR-15 style weapons, My "anti-assault" shotguns, or my "anti-assault" handguns! Because that is what they are for..... I'm NOT going to assault anyone, but I WILL use them to DEFEND myself..... there by making them "Anti" assault weapons......
What do you think the  and the news and the anti gunners would say if we started calling them "anti-assault" weapons??
 |
I think most of us completely agree, I would never be the first to draw a gun... However defense wise I would never want to be without one... Cops often say to the CCW "one less victim". Yet people are trying to ban it? Unedjucated blabber...
The UK has one of the highest violent crime rates, and guess what. Guns are illegal there not even cops can carry without getting proper temporary authority... Look at other country's with no gun ownership and the pattern repeats itself... People know that there are no guns so they don't have to worry about a homeowner with a shotgun so there's alot less consequence in their mind...