View Single Post
Old March 12th, 2005, 12:54 PM   #5
P95Carry
Assistant Administrator
 
P95Carry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,407
P95Carry is a forum contributor
Quote:
then will we be "in" for the same identical fate as the U.K.?
QK - I think and hope the big distinction here is ... ''right'' vs ''privelage''.

The latter can be withdrawn in the blink of an eye ... the former - tho it can be eroded (and is being) would IMO require the most heinous of changes to the constitution to abruptly nullify ... such that there would probably be serious protest and unrest.

In the present climate I'd suspect the closest things might get to it would be following martial law - whilst POTUS had extremes of power. There again, whilst as you say the shooting fraternity is hardly a majority - it does have a voice way bigger and louder than UK ever had. Just look at gun ownership on a simple ''one in the house'' aspect.

Complacency tho is something we cannot have - even whilst the frog in the pot is the current name of the game - there is need to be ''on the case'' all the time. And to answer your main question - no, I cannot see a ''tour de force'' type situation like happened in UK.

We do, and have to keep reminding the anti's, that control of the vast and safe majority is no way to effect control on the minority of criminal bent - concentrate on those for sure but leave everyone else the hell alone!!
__________________
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug
P95Carry is offline   Reply With Quote