DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum - View Single Post

sheepdog · December 2nd, 2006, 10:21 AM

75, I bought some VERY thin Kydex mag holders from a guy on Glocktalk, I think his name is mcpearce or mpearce there. I also have Bladetech, Comp-tac, and Ky-Tac holders to compare them. At any rate, they are the THINNEST kydex I have ever seen and are much thinner than the others...and are featherlight. The ones for my M&P have some minor function issues that I attribute to the thinness, and I'm not sure I would recommend them for a double stack mag. I'll replace them with my favorites, the CT. The ones for my 1911 work fine. I have been worried about the belt clips breaking, but so far I haven't had a problem and they were cheap enough that I wouldn't worry if I did. I did do some reshaping and changing out screws to improve the appearance, but for a single stack gun they seem to be great. I can put the calipers to them and measure them if you want. He posts pics at GT.

December 2nd, 2006, 10:21 AM	#4
sheepdog Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 581	75, I bought some VERY thin Kydex mag holders from a guy on Glocktalk, I think his name is mcpearce or mpearce there. I also have Bladetech, Comp-tac, and Ky-Tac holders to compare them. At any rate, they are the THINNEST kydex I have ever seen and are much thinner than the others...and are featherlight. The ones for my M&P have some minor function issues that I attribute to the thinness, and I'm not sure I would recommend them for a double stack mag. I'll replace them with my favorites, the CT. The ones for my 1911 work fine. I have been worried about the belt clips breaking, but so far I haven't had a problem and they were cheap enough that I wouldn't worry if I did. I did do some reshaping and changing out screws to improve the appearance, but for a single stack gun they seem to be great. I can put the calipers to them and measure them if you want. He posts pics at GT. __________________ What Would Gumby Do? Last edited by sheepdog; December 2nd, 2006 at 10:24 AM.. Reason: detail correction.