DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum - View Single Post - Any help comparing the Comp-tac 2 O'clock vs. the Fist #K4?

ShooterMcGavin · July 2nd, 2008, 06:58 PM

I have been eying these two holsters for a long time - the Comp-tac Two O'clock and the Fist #K4.

I will be carrying a Kel-tec PF-9 in one of these holsters. I'd like to try carrying in the 2 o'clock position, but I will also try it at 11 o'clock (if that will work).

The Comp-tac seems to be made of a thicker Kydex than the Fist, but Fist offers the option to use a thicker type of Kydex than the ultra-thin. Is that "ultra-thin" Kydex tough enough to last for a few years of use? The Comp-tac looks to have a more durable design, but the Fist looks more form-fitting. The Fist seems to use a low attachment point for the clip, allowing more space for tucking of a shirt. If I got the Two O'clock, I would buy it with the J-hook option. Can anyone comment on the difference between each holster in actual use?

Thanks.

July 2nd, 2008, 06:58 PM	#1
ShooterMcGavin Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: WA Posts: 28	Any help comparing the Comp-tac 2 O'clock vs. the Fist #K4? I have been eying these two holsters for a long time - the Comp-tac Two O'clock and the Fist #K4. I will be carrying a Kel-tec PF-9 in one of these holsters. I'd like to try carrying in the 2 o'clock position, but I will also try it at 11 o'clock (if that will work). The Comp-tac seems to be made of a thicker Kydex than the Fist, but Fist offers the option to use a thicker type of Kydex than the ultra-thin. Is that "ultra-thin" Kydex tough enough to last for a few years of use? The Comp-tac looks to have a more durable design, but the Fist looks more form-fitting. The Fist seems to use a low attachment point for the clip, allowing more space for tucking of a shirt. If I got the Two O'clock, I would buy it with the J-hook option. Can anyone comment on the difference between each holster in actual use? Thanks.