DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum - View Single Post - GCO: Atlanta plans to announce the arresting of any carry within the law tomorrow

Moga · July 9th, 2008, 06:24 AM

Most states in the country allow some form of airport carry in non-sterile areas. I believe there are only seven states where it isn't allowed.

The City of Atlanta is posed to lose to Georgia Carry yet again. But unlike previous battles, this time the outcome of the lawsuit has ramifications for Franklin and DeCosta personally.

US Code 42 Chapter 21 Section 1983

Section 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,
regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the
District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any
citizen of the United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges,
or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable
to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other
proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought
against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such
officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted
unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was
unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress
applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be
considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

I would like this to be the last time anyone in Georgia, especially in Atlanta, attempts to circumvent the Amendment II freedoms protected by state law and the BOR in a pursuit of a personal agenda. I want these bozos to be made example of, so others are very keenly aware of the ramifications of interfering with the lawful carry of firearms.

We shall see. July 21 is quickly approaching.

July 9th, 2008, 06:24 AM	#49
Moga Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Atlanta Posts: 286	Most states in the country allow some form of airport carry in non-sterile areas. I believe there are only seven states where it isn't allowed. The City of Atlanta is posed to lose to Georgia Carry yet again. But unlike previous battles, this time the outcome of the lawsuit has ramifications for Franklin and DeCosta personally. US Code 42 Chapter 21 Section 1983 Section 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. I would like this to be the last time anyone in Georgia, especially in Atlanta, attempts to circumvent the Amendment II freedoms protected by state law and the BOR in a pursuit of a personal agenda. I want these bozos to be made example of, so others are very keenly aware of the ramifications of interfering with the lawful carry of firearms. We shall see. July 21 is quickly approaching. __________________ Dont believe OBAMA: http://www.nraila.org/OBAMA/ They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin, 1759. Proud Member of GeorgiaCarry.Org