View Single Post
Old November 1st, 2008, 09:57 AM   #42
VTFatBa*d
Member
 
VTFatBa*d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 70
VTFatBa*d
It was in bad taste, not just because it was gun related. The same uproar occured after Princess Diana's death when a Volvo dealership in (I believe) Australia ran an ad saying that if she had been riding in a Volvo instead of a Mercedes, she might still be alive.

It was tacky then, and it's tacky now, to exploit the death of others for commercial gain. That's the difference when we discuss on this board how a story might have ended differently had the victims been in possesion of a firearm. Nobody involved in the discussion stands to gain financially from discussing the loss of life.
__________________
Rob - The Vermont Fat Ba*d
An armed criminal will kill an unarmed citizen with monotonous regularity.
Trying to control crime with gun control laws is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.
VTFatBa*d is offline   Reply With Quote