Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Carry Discussion > Defensive Carry Guns
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Carry Guns This is the place to discuss what you carry, how and why or ask advice. Feel free to post pictures of your carry rigs.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 7th, 2007, 10:09 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
sheepdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 500
sheepdog
S&W 1911 grip safety/FP safety problems?

Anyone here shooting a S&W 1911 have problems with the grip safety not engaging the FP safety without lots of extra effort to make the grip "right" or having any signs of timing problems with the set-up? Signs of peening on the safety plunger? I want a S&W 1911 in the 4.25 size, but their FP safety turns me off due to problems I had with the Kimber version. If you had problems, was S&W's fix enough, or is it just...the design?
TIA
__________________
What Would Gumby Do?
sheepdog is online now  
Old December 7th, 2007, 10:22 AM   #2
JD
Senior Moderator
 
JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bedford County Virginia
Posts: 9,015
JD is a forum contributor
I only had problems on my Kimber series II after I changed out the main spring housing, but some light filing on the inside face of the housing fixed that.

Smith had a recall on them back in '06 IIRC.

Personally I prefer NOT having the additional safety, and like Springfields approach at it by using a heavier spring and lighter (Ti) firing pin.

When it comes to the firing pin safeties, I prefer the current Colt design over the Schwartz design used in Kimbers, Smiths, and a couple of others.

Some complain that in the Colts the trigger pull is afffected with the added guts of the safety, but I can't tell the difference.

I'd suggest checking out either 1911Forum.com or m1911.org to check the threads under the S&W sections to do do some research on the subject.
__________________
On "Vacation" till thing settle down with the little guy.

Garrett Matthew _______, 8lbs 4oz. 21"
11-25-08
JD is online now  
Old December 7th, 2007, 11:58 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 114
joffe
Just get a 1911 without the firing pin safety - it's a worthless anti-lawyer measure, condition 1 series 70 guns are safe as ever and you won't have to worry about engaging the FPS when you should be worrying about other things.
__________________
Free State Project
joffe is offline  
Old December 7th, 2007, 12:23 PM   #4
JD
Senior Moderator
 
JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bedford County Virginia
Posts: 9,015
JD is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by joffe View Post
Just get a 1911 without the firing pin safety - it's a worthless anti-lawyer measure, condition 1 series 70 guns are safe as ever and you won't have to worry about engaging the FPS when you should be worrying about other things.
But the problem with that is finding a Commander sized (meaning a true 4.25 bushing bbl, not a 4" bushingless) 1911 with the desired options from the factory for under $1K.
__________________
On "Vacation" till thing settle down with the little guy.

Garrett Matthew _______, 8lbs 4oz. 21"
11-25-08
JD is online now  
Old December 8th, 2007, 01:08 AM   #5
Member
 
ccwguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 63
ccwguy
I have a S&W 1911Sc Commander model, and I have almost the exact opposite "problem". The grip safety is disengaged with only a very slight touch... just a couple of millimeters of movement. It isn't a problem yet, but could it continue to worsen and get to the point where it doesn't even function as a safety anymore?
ccwguy is online now  
Old December 8th, 2007, 10:10 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 114
joffe
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccwguy View Post
I have a S&W 1911Sc Commander model, and I have almost the exact opposite "problem". The grip safety is disengaged with only a very slight touch... just a couple of millimeters of movement. It isn't a problem yet, but could it continue to worsen and get to the point where it doesn't even function as a safety anymore?
You don't need the grip safety anyways, the thumb safety is more than enough. Jeff Cooper pinned the grip safety on his 1911s.
__________________
Free State Project
joffe is offline  
Old December 8th, 2007, 12:02 PM   #7
OD
VIP Member
 
OD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vatican City
Posts: 2,735
OD is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog View Post
If you had problems, was S&W's fix enough, or is it just...the design?
TIA
S&W will fix the pistol if you have a timing problem the safety. It really isn't a bad design if it is carried out correctly, the Swartz safety was first used in 1937, it was dropped during WWII as the US Government requested their M1911A1s without it. The safety was designed by Colt engineer William L. Swartz.
__________________
OD
"Slow down, you'll get a more harmonious outcome...."
--------------------------------------------
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." - Jeff Cooper
OD is offline  
Old December 8th, 2007, 12:19 PM   #8
Assistant Administrator
 
QKShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Off Of The X
Posts: 19,972
QKShooter is a forum contributor
The grip safety is disengaged with only a very slight touch... just a couple of millimeters of movement.
"It isn't a problem yet, but could it continue to worsen and get to the point where it doesn't even function as a safety anymore?"

ccwguy
No, that would not happen. The grip safety is basically a lever flange that moves up to unblock the trigger.
So once it moves up and off the trigger bow it basically does not contact anything else and for that reason it's not normally a part that would "wear" or get worse over time.
__________________
QKShooter is online now  
Old December 8th, 2007, 12:43 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
sheepdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 500
sheepdog
I have STI and Springfield, and prefer them for the reasons the users above stated (and my Kimber problem), but I may get a chance at an excellent deal on a S&W very soon. I have had very good response with S&W service in the past, but wanted to avoid it at all. I noticed several posters here have the guns. I'll wander over to the 1911 forum and see what they have to say, but it seems like troubles are often over-reported.
__________________
What Would Gumby Do?
sheepdog is online now  
Old December 8th, 2007, 12:46 PM   #10
OD
VIP Member
 
OD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vatican City
Posts: 2,735
OD is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog View Post
but it seems like troubles are often over-reported.
A lot of people are quicker to complain, than to praise.
__________________
OD
"Slow down, you'll get a more harmonious outcome...."
--------------------------------------------
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." - Jeff Cooper
OD is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008