|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Carry Guns This is the place to discuss what you carry, how and why or ask advice. Feel free to post pictures of your carry rigs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 175
![]() |
Help a Coastie out...decisions decisions
I am planning on getting either a Sig 239 SAS DAK or the new Walther PPS when I return home from deployment. It is going to be my CCW. They will both be in 40 S&W by the time i get home but I dont think I need a 40, 9 should do just fine. It wont be used as home defense, I have Mossberg 590 for that, but it will be shot at the range from time to time and like I said before as a CCW. I kinda want both but can see myself having 2...not yet anyway. I'm a decent sized guy (5'8" 180) so either gun will be fine for concealing. I have never shot a walther in my life. We do however carry Sigs. In DAK. I'm more familiar with a Sig and also used to the mag release on those. I believe that sig has a trace grips but walther does not...yet? Which one would u choose and why? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Among the living
Posts: 357
![]() |
I'm sure you will get a multitude of opinions on this, but if it were me and I was already used to the Sig (and liked it) I'd go with the Sig first and then down the line the Walther (or what ever caught my eye at the time)
__________________
When Guns Are Outlawed, Only Outlaw's will have guns Just remember, when seconds count, help is mere minutes away Also remember when you go to trial by jury, you are putting yourself into the hands of 12 people, who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Mayberry, GA
Posts: 2,136
![]() |
Ditto
__________________
"Just getting a concealed carry permit means you haven't commited a crime yet........CCP holders commit crimes." Daniel Vice, senior attorney for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, as quoted on Fox & Friends, July 7th, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 10,041
![]() |
I'll admit to being bias, but go with the SIG. I have a 239 in 9mm and the thing is a dream to shoot.
When you get back see if you can find a range where you can rent and try them both out. That way you get what YOU like best!
__________________
Rick EOD - Initial success or total failure
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Here and There
Posts: 10,083
![]() |
Sig is the better gun, but I would not worry about those goofy laser grips. Save your money and buy ammo and become skilled instead.
__________________
In a land of sheep, even a toothless wolf is king. Wake Up! The zombie invasion has begun years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,027
![]() |
Sig unless weight and size is critical
If I could conceal the Sig P239 easily, I would tend to get that gun, as it is a known quantity with a good reputation. The P239 in 9mm weighs about 27.5 ounces with a 3.6 inch barrel. Capacity is 8+1
The Walther PPS is newer and just on the market. It is smaller and thinner than the Sig, weighing about 21.3 ounces empty with a 3.2 inch barrel. Capacity is from 6+1 to 8+1, depending on which magazine is chosen. It would conceal more easily, although there are not a lot of holsters available yet.
__________________
Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the Peoples' Liberty's Teeth." - George Washington |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,160
![]() |
I previously had a similar thread running (pps vs p239) and have given it much thought. I haven't bought either yet, but I'm leaning toward the Sig, in fact I was pricing one yesterday. One of the things that "tipped the scales" for me to the Sig, is the magazine release. I believe, under pressure, there would be a chance that I wouldn't operate the Walther mag release properly since it is not "natural" to me........the Sig is.
I really like the thin PPS, and may also get it one day, but for now I'll buy the 239 first. Good luck, both are great guns, but for CCW I think the Sig edges the Walther a little, at least for me.
__________________
Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 175
![]() |
Im starting to think the same thing
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 2,455
![]() |
Well, I just bought a Sig P239 SAS (though I won't actually be able to use it for 7 more weeks!), so that should tell you were I stand.
If you're familiar with the Sig, the DAK, and so on, I see no compelling reason to go to the PPS (other than the fact that it's a cool little gun!).
__________________
"It makes no difference what men think of war, said the judge. War endures. As well ask men what they think of stone. War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner. That is the way it was and will be. That way and not some other way." |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 175
![]() |
Well I just spoke with the wife, she says I can get both but I have to get rid of my other handgun. Its my first one though...Its a Taurus PT-92 Compact...
what to do what to do |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|