Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Carry Discussion > Defensive Carry Guns
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Carry Guns This is the place to discuss what you carry, how and why or ask advice. Feel free to post pictures of your carry rigs.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 3rd, 2008, 10:28 PM   #1
Distinguished Member
 
ExactlyMyPoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,598
ExactlyMyPoint is a forum contributor
Police downsizing ammunition

I just bought a Glock 19. (More details on that in another thread.) I called a gun store and asked if they had a Glock 19 in stock. I really didn't expect him to say no, but he said, "I have one left....no wait. It just sold. I don't know when I will be getting any more in. The police are downsizing their guns from .40s to 9mm and buying them all up because the ammunition is cheaper."

Anyone else heard this?
__________________
- Let me explain. No. There is too much. Let me summarize.
- Doing my part to create a huge carbon footprint
- Be still, and know that I am God; Psalms 46:10
- You are God and that's just the way it is
ExactlyMyPoint is online now  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 10:42 PM   #2
VIP Member
 
SIXTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Here and There
Posts: 10,083
SIXTO is a forum contributor
not so much because ammo is cheaper, but because its easier to get everybody to shoot well with a 9mm.
__________________
In a land of sheep, even a toothless wolf is king.

Wake Up! The zombie invasion has begun years ago.
SIXTO is online now  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 11:17 PM   #3
VIP Member
 
archer51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 2,580
archer51 is a forum contributor
Works for me, means more .40 cal ammo for me to shoot!! I realize they save money by going to the 9mm, but myself I prefer the added stopping power of the 40 cal. I know shot placement is primary concern for stops but I want all the advantage I can get. As to getting everyone to shoot well. If they can't shoot a .40 what makes them think they will be able to shoot a 9mm any better?
archer51 is online now  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 11:21 PM   #4
VIP Member
 
SIXTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Here and There
Posts: 10,083
SIXTO is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by archer51 View Post
As to getting everyone to shoot well. If they can't shoot a .40 what makes them think they will be able to shoot a 9mm any better?
Its a lot easier to get non shooters to do well with a 9mm over a 40. 40 is the toughest of the three common selections (9, 40 and 45) to get the masses to shoot really well.

Even I shoot a 9mm or 45 better than I shoot a 40; and I shoot about a case a month and at one time I'd do a case a week or more when prepping for an event.

Have you ever shot a G19 and G23 side by side? Its a lot different, especially if you are recoil sensitive.

Granted, it shouldnt make a difference because the mechanics remain the same, but humans are not machines and have involuntary quirks.
__________________
In a land of sheep, even a toothless wolf is king.

Wake Up! The zombie invasion has begun years ago.
SIXTO is online now  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 11:29 PM   #5
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: College Station
Posts: 1,263
Hopyard is a forum contributor
Agree with Sixto.

I do think .40 could be improved a great deal if ammo makers would tweak them.

Since I'm not a .45 guy, I don't know the full array of ammo choices available in that round, but it is my understanding that there are plenty of varieties to chose from. It is more limited in .40.

Not to sound like a broken record because I've made the following comment before--- Blazer once produced a 125 grain .40. I loved it. Can't get it anymore.

Hey, if anyone in the ammo biz reads this---think good defensive round with lower recoil in .40.
Hopyard is online now  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 11:57 PM   #6
Member
 
mtnfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a place you've only dreamed of where your soul is always free...
Posts: 133
mtnfreak
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIXTO View Post
not so much because ammo is cheaper, but because its easier to get everybody to shoot well with a 9mm.
Wish that was true for me. After running through a paycheck worth of ammo at the range today, I again confirmed that my XD .40sc makes tighter groups than my full size Ruger P89 at 25 yds.
Let's wait until after allergy season to talk about my AR-15 groupings at 100yds. Hard to shoot well when your eyes are itchy and watery.
__________________
Law without force is impotent.
Blaise Pascal
mtnfreak is offline  
Old May 4th, 2008, 12:18 AM   #7
Member
 
jframe38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 303
jframe38 is a forum contributor
NYC LEO told me that their main carry gun is the Glock 19 w/Speer Gold dot 124+p. Backup is a 642. Some have SIGS and some M&Ps.
jframe38 is offline  
Old May 4th, 2008, 12:24 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairfax, Vermont
Posts: 1,015
morintp
First let me say that I wish I went shooting half as much as Sixto, but there is no way I could afford it.

I just wanted to add that, even though I shoot my 4506 good enough, I shoot my P229 in .40 much better. For me, it's also dependent upon the ammo. When I slowfire practice the 229 with my carry ammo, Winchester Ranger T-Series, I shoot out the center of the target. I can't do that with WWB. It's difficult for me to even get cloverleafs with the 4506 using T-Series or HSTs.

But to add a caveat, it could also be the gun. My 4506 is a nice straight shooter, but the grips are a bit thin for my liking. I like the fatter grip on the 229, I think it helps me shoot better. So until I shoot a Sig 220 in .45, I can't say for sure that I'm better with .40.
morintp is online now  
Old May 4th, 2008, 12:42 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,161
mcp1810
I find it highly amusing. Understand I am not bashing the .40 but I had always thought of it as a solution looking for a problem, mostly because of how it came to be. Some day I might even own one, but right now I have other stuff I need to buy first.
__________________
"And what would you do with your brain if you had one?" - Dorothy
mcp1810 is offline  
Old May 4th, 2008, 01:14 AM   #10
HKR
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ga
Posts: 169
HKR
I went looking for some G-19 mags in a shop that usually keeps a good supply back in April. Not only was he out of them, but he said that G-19s and G-26s with nightsites were back ordered at all three of his distributers. He had plenty of them with regular sights for $489, but he said when and if he could get a G-19/26 with NS they would be $599. He sells a LOT of Glocks and had always been straight with me. YMMV.
HKR is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008