Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Concealed Carry Guns
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Concealed Carry Guns This is the place to discuss what you carry, how and why or ask advice. Feel free to post pictures of your carry rigs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 15th, 2008, 08:28 PM   #1
Ace12
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 78
Ace12
S&W 642 question????

I am thinking about buying a 642 very soon. I just have a few questions. Does the CT grips that come on the 642CT feel pretty good? I know there is different grips that CT makes, but its sure alot cheaper to buy the 642 with the CT grips already on it. Does anybody find it annoying to have a "Double action only" revolver?
__________________
Proud GCO Member
Ace12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 08:40 PM   #2
wht06rado
Senior Member
 
wht06rado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 651
wht06rado is a forum contributor
I can't comment on the CT grips sorry. But as far as finding my double action only revolver annoying? No. Deffinately not. I would never, IMO, need to fire single action in a defensive revolver. Now, if you are looking for something to play with at the range I could see how it might get annoying. But in a purely defensive revolver. Nope. Not at all.

Wht
__________________
“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security” Benjamin Franklin
I'm not pro gun, I'm pro rights. What are you?

NRA
Member
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
wht06rado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 08:53 PM   #3
nn
VIP Member
 
nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 3,609
nn is a forum contributor
Quote:
Does anybody find it annoying to have a "Double action only" revolver?
Yes, I've shot single action so much that it is automatic to pull the hammer back.
nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 09:36 PM   #4
Delta Force
Member
 
Delta Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NH
Posts: 391
Delta Force
I never shoot my defence revolvers single action.
__________________
Have Fun and Shoot Straight!
Delta Force is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 09:39 PM   #5
mrhutch
Member
 
mrhutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 202
mrhutch
cocking the hammer to shoot in a defensive situation can be "dangerous" (i use the term lightly because, after all, thats the point of having a gun). the trigger pull on a single action revolver is SOOOOOOOOOO light, you could accidentally fire without needing too or too early. i would just stick with a DAO and learn to use it. the 642 is hammerless, anyway.
mrhutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 09:49 PM   #6
sass20485
Distinguished Member
 
sass20485's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,242
sass20485 is a forum contributor
Pull trigger gun cocks and goes bang, what is annoying about that ? With a bit of practice it is quite easy to get used to shooting double action and for a defensive situation, that is what you should be doing. The CT grip that comes on the SW 642 is their model 405 and it feels very good in my hand. I bought mine individually and saved a bit of money.
sass20485 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 09:57 PM   #7
Ron
Senior Member
 
Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,035
Ron is a forum contributor
I bought the Model 405 Crimson Trace laser Grips individually because when I bought my 642 S&W was using a different model, which made it more difficult to pocket carry. The Model 405 grips are very comfortable, and help take up recoil.
__________________
"It does not do to leave a dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him."

J. R. R. Tolkien
Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 10:21 PM   #8
Ace12
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 78
Ace12
So S&W is using the 405 now instead of the 305? Does the smaller grip of the 405 make it harder to hold?
__________________
Proud GCO Member
Ace12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 11:23 PM   #9
bluelineman
Senior Member
 
bluelineman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 709
bluelineman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace12 View Post
So S&W is using the 405 now instead of the 305? Does the smaller grip of the 405 make it harder to hold?
It's just as easy as the grips that come standard on the gun from the factory. I have the CT LG 405 on my 442 (blues version of 642) & it feels a little better actually. The backstrap is padded for recoil reduction. They also fit well for pocket carry.
bluelineman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2008, 11:36 PM   #10
bmcgilvray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 889
bmcgilvray
In J-Frame Smith & Wesson revolvers I have a Model 642 but prefer an older Chief's Special...with a hammer I can cock. DAO definitely annoys me. While I can shoot a revolver well enough in DA mode I'll use it to my best advantage in SA mode if possible. "Dangerous" be hanged. If things have deteriorated to the point that I'm pointing a gun at a person there's a really good reason for them to be shot. I like good triggers and I'll have good triggers. I can control a trigger and don't require some crummy, long and heavy DAO trigger design to do it for me.
bmcgilvray is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008