Any good reasons not to buy a Kahr TP-9? - Page 2

Tex · January 22nd, 2006, 11:10 PM

Just joined .. first post.

When I took my CCW instruction and test, it was with a prior SS agent and now SWAT trainer for several counties in my area, and a duputy in two.

I had a 380 and he suggested something more powerful. I explained and showed him my hand injury (military). He said he could find something I could handle and at the break we went to his SUV, where he broke out about 20 handguns.

Now standing on the street looking at hand guns is fun, but I said it was wierd. He pulled his vest back and the two star shields showed. So it is OK when with a law man!!!!

We tried a few of the more well known in several calibers and then he went for the Kahr. It was right up my alley and I bought a K9. I rejected the polymer going for the matte stainless steel. I have never thought it was heavy and I have put over 1,800 rounds through it, about 250 at a time, with one hung up rejected case early on.

I have the greatest belt holster and can carry all day with out any problems. I carry when ever I leave the ranch ... family, friends, town, meetings ... every where I can. Only a few people even know I have a CC permit or carry. It has been about 2 years now since Missouri passed it and it took some time to handle hugs, embraces by aunts and the like, and still learning. The wardrobe certainly changed and still looking for wear out of trouser shirts with snaps (not buttons ... hand injury). Long jean jackets, long leather vests, shirts my wife turns into straight cut bottoms, and photographers vests have all found their way into my closet.

I do not like IWB holsters or deep carry but am considering a paddle holster when I do not have time to change belt holster to new trousers. Any suggestions here?
Tex

stmichps · June 9th, 2006, 12:08 AM

I have a Kahr TP-9 and found no problems with it. The thin profile makes it a pleasure to carry in the waistband. The polymer frame and stainless slide elimates concerns of corrosion. The added 1/2 inch of barrel & slide makes the recoil non-existant.

mstarn · June 9th, 2006, 10:12 AM

I have one very good reason for not buying one.

I DON'T ENOUGH MONEY. Otherwise, I would have one now. Love the Kahr weapons. Think they are a fine pistol. Strongly recommend them to anyone.

Mark

TonySoprano · June 9th, 2006, 11:14 AM

If you don't buy it I will

PJH · June 9th, 2006, 04:40 PM

I have no experience with the TP -9, but just purchased a used K9, which I REALLY like. I had a P40 Covert which, while I had no mechanical issues with it, actually hurt to shoot; it wore a raw,bruised spot at the base of my shooting hand thumb after < 50 rounds.

For IWB carry, the extra weight of the all steel gun is not really noticeable, and the all metal Kahrs have had far fewer reported problems than the polymer guns. Just food for thought

-Paul

kansas_shooter · June 9th, 2006, 04:59 PM

I like them except for no safety mechanisims. I personally would not buy one. IMO, I would buy a para LDA single stack. I know what your thinking, their expensive, but well worth it. Just my two cents.

chris s · June 10th, 2006, 09:10 AM

When I was work my Dept approved the K9 as an off-duty gun. I was pushing for the P9. Even though we had glocks the gunnysmiths weren't fond of plastic. I didn't see the point of carrying a small heavy gun. My PM9 was part of the recall. I sent the barrel back and they throated and polished it -My gun worked fine before getting recalled. I tested it after I got it back -it works. I get alot of "you carry that little thing" then we shoot and the comments change to "I have to think about buying one of those.

frankmako · June 11th, 2006, 12:47 AM

don't know to much about kahr's, but if you shoot it often (breakin -500+ rounds) with different ammo you will find out what the gun will do and not do. some guns like one type/brand of ammo over others.

fed_wif_a_sig · June 11th, 2006, 09:21 PM

Just last week I bought a TP9 that a chain store had discontinued and the price was well below anywhere else. I am in love, I only wish my agency would let me carry it on duty. As said earlier the extra 1/2" makes a hugh difference. It feeds any quality ammo effortlessly and shoots so much better than I do (and I'm pretty dang good). If you can afford it, get it, you wont be sorry.

January 22nd, 2006, 11:10 PM	#11
Tex New Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwest Missouri Posts: 1	Kahr Just joined .. first post. When I took my CCW instruction and test, it was with a prior SS agent and now SWAT trainer for several counties in my area, and a duputy in two. I had a 380 and he suggested something more powerful. I explained and showed him my hand injury (military). He said he could find something I could handle and at the break we went to his SUV, where he broke out about 20 handguns. Now standing on the street looking at hand guns is fun, but I said it was wierd. He pulled his vest back and the two star shields showed. So it is OK when with a law man!!!! We tried a few of the more well known in several calibers and then he went for the Kahr. It was right up my alley and I bought a K9. I rejected the polymer going for the matte stainless steel. I have never thought it was heavy and I have put over 1,800 rounds through it, about 250 at a time, with one hung up rejected case early on. I have the greatest belt holster and can carry all day with out any problems. I carry when ever I leave the ranch ... family, friends, town, meetings ... every where I can. Only a few people even know I have a CC permit or carry. It has been about 2 years now since Missouri passed it and it took some time to handle hugs, embraces by aunts and the like, and still learning. The wardrobe certainly changed and still looking for wear out of trouser shirts with snaps (not buttons ... hand injury). Long jean jackets, long leather vests, shirts my wife turns into straight cut bottoms, and photographers vests have all found their way into my closet. I do not like IWB holsters or deep carry but am considering a paddle holster when I do not have time to change belt holster to new trousers. Any suggestions here? Tex

June 9th, 2006, 04:59 PM	#16
kansas_shooter Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Kansas City, KS Posts: 317	I like them except for no safety mechanisims. I personally would not buy one. IMO, I would buy a para LDA single stack. I know what your thinking, their expensive, but well worth it. Just my two cents. __________________ One shot. One kill. Primary Carry - Taurus PT-111 Mil Pro 9mm DAO with 12 + 1 in the pipe. Holstered in a Brigade OWB M2. Secondary Weapon - Taurus PT1911 5" 45acp SA with 8+1. Holstered in a Kydex paddle.

June 11th, 2006, 09:21 PM	#19
fed_wif_a_sig Distinguished Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton, TX Posts: 1,365	Just last week I bought a TP9 that a chain store had discontinued and the price was well below anywhere else. I am in love, I only wish my agency would let me carry it on duty. As said earlier the extra 1/2" makes a hugh difference. It feeds any quality ammo effortlessly and shoots so much better than I do (and I'm pretty dang good). If you can afford it, get it, you wont be sorry. __________________ Steve "Respect all ... Fear none!!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

June 9th, 2006, 12:08 AM	#12
stmichps Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: USA/Michigan Posts: 80	I have a Kahr TP-9 and found no problems with it. The thin profile makes it a pleasure to carry in the waistband. The polymer frame and stainless slide elimates concerns of corrosion. The added 1/2 inch of barrel & slide makes the recoil non-existant.

June 9th, 2006, 10:12 AM	#13
mstarn Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: South Carolina Posts: 91	I have one very good reason for not buying one. I DON'T ENOUGH MONEY. Otherwise, I would have one now. Love the Kahr weapons. Think they are a fine pistol. Strongly recommend them to anyone. Mark

June 9th, 2006, 11:14 AM	#14
TonySoprano Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bada Bing Strip Club Posts: 168	If you don't buy it I will

June 9th, 2006, 04:40 PM	#15
PJH Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 67	I have no experience with the TP -9, but just purchased a used K9, which I REALLY like. I had a P40 Covert which, while I had no mechanical issues with it, actually hurt to shoot; it wore a raw,bruised spot at the base of my shooting hand thumb after < 50 rounds. For IWB carry, the extra weight of the all steel gun is not really noticeable, and the all metal Kahrs have had far fewer reported problems than the polymer guns. Just food for thought -Paul

June 10th, 2006, 09:10 AM	#17
chris s Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: NEW YORK Posts: 83	When I was work my Dept approved the K9 as an off-duty gun. I was pushing for the P9. Even though we had glocks the gunnysmiths weren't fond of plastic. I didn't see the point of carrying a small heavy gun. My PM9 was part of the recall. I sent the barrel back and they throated and polished it -My gun worked fine before getting recalled. I tested it after I got it back -it works. I get alot of "you carry that little thing" then we shoot and the comments change to "I have to think about buying one of those.

June 11th, 2006, 12:47 AM	#18
frankmako Distinguished Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Parts Unknown Posts: 1,889	don't know to much about kahr's, but if you shoot it often (breakin -500+ rounds) with different ammo you will find out what the gun will do and not do. some guns like one type/brand of ammo over others.