Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions Discussion regarding concealed carry licensing, issues, methods of concealment, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 25th, 2008, 07:57 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
FN1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 1,136
FN1910
Quote:
The gun owner was pulled over for running through a red light, a charge which the gun owner disputes.
Very few people pulled over for running a red light do not dispute it. I would say that tthis is probably true. Maybe some LEO in here can enlighten us on whether most people admit it or deny it.

Quote:
The gun owner, believing that he had to disclose he was lawfully armed as they do in North Carolina, dutifully told the officer he had a NC CHP and was indeed armed.
Don't see a thing worng with this. I would do the same if stopped in VA.

Quote:
The officer seemed to ignore the statement, but very shortly two more patrol units pulled up.
This is where it gets weird. Why did two more units pull up? Did the first officer call for help and if so why. Or did they just happen by and decide to stop. This is something that could shed some light on this incident.

Quote:
The next thing the gun owner knew he is in a "felony stop" mode. He was asked to walk backwards towards the officers, who then disarmed and handcuffed him.
What is "felony stop" mode. Where was he when made to walk backwards. Were they doing a roadside sobrtiety check? They disarmed and handcuffed him. Sounds like standard procedure for someone being arrested.

Quote:
While trying to unloaded his gun, THEY DROPPED IT ONTO THE ROAD!
This I could believe. I doubt that they threw it on the road but how many in here have not dropped their gun. Isn't that something that we all check for when choosing a gun is one that will not go off if dropped?

Quote:
The two officers and a SERGEANT then proceeded to tell him that he was under arrested for:
OK

Quote:
1. Having hollow point bullets, which they claimed were illegal in Virginia (!)
That is wild from all standpoints I would have thought they knew that law?

Quote:
2. Taking a loaded gun across the state line, which the gun owner was told was a FELONY (!)
Unless they thought he wa a felon then surely they would have know about the federal travel guidelines.

Quote:
3. Having a concealed gun that the police said he couldn't have since he was from North Carolina (!!)
Hard to believe a Fairfax LEO didn't know NC had reciprocity unless they were completely clueless

Quote:
His car and gun were impounded and he was taken off to a magistrate.
Again standard proceedure for someone arrested.

Quote:
The magistrate looked at the charges and told the police officers that they had just made a false arrest.
Sounds good to me

Quote:
The officers pointed out the possession of hollow point bullets. The magistrate asked, "are they teflon coated?"

"No," replied on of the officers.

"Then they are legal."
Hard to think that a judge would even ask about teflon coated but maybe he was as flustered as anyone.

Quote:
Trying to find something that would stick and justify the false arrest, one of the officers said, "We couldn't verify that his North Carolina permit is valid."

The magistrate looked at the permit, noticed the phone number on the back where one can call to verify the permit, called the number, and within a few minutes found out the permit was indeed valid.
Why did the judge call to verify, he should have known it was valid at face value unless he was calling to see if it had been revoked and then only if he had reason to think it was. I just checked my SC and NH permits and there is no phone number on either of them. Is that a NC thing?

Quote:
The gun owner was ordered to be released.
I would hope so.

Quote:
After being released from custody, the gun owner was given a hard time by another officer about getting his gun back, but he did finally get it back.
That is probably a matter of interpretation but I imagine that they did not give it back as fast as the owner wanted it. How about the car they impounded. Did they give it back?

Quote:
If all of that isn't bad enough, the arresting officer went ahead and gave the gun owner a ticket for the alleged offense of running a red light!
I would think so since this is how the whole thing started.

Quote:
In essence, with that brilliant move, the officer was practically BEGGING the gun owner to PLEASE sue Fairfax County for the false arrest!
I am sure that is how the fellow felt.


Not that is my opinion on this and I really don't know what to think. Sounds like some serious misunderstanding but if they actually carried him to court on those three charges then that is some serious stuff.
FN1910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 01:22 AM   #42
Member
 
biasedbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 243
biasedbulldog is a forum contributor
Brief thoughts:

Stories that may be factually correct are not necessarily entirely true. There's another side to this story. Of course, the other side might be exactly like this one, heh.

But I'd like to see an AP story on it. I get the feeling that, while this may be a factual account, there might be some mitigating factors in favor of the LEO's.

[read: I HOPE TO GOD THAT THESE LEO'S AREN'T THAT (edit: SILLY)].
__________________
"War necessarily brings with it some virtues, and great and heroic virtues too. What horrid creatures we men are, that we cannot be virtuous without murdering one another?" -John Adams
biasedbulldog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 08:00 AM   #43
VIP Member
 
ccw9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon USA
Posts: 5,633
ccw9mm is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by biasedbulldog View Post
[read: I HOPE TO GOD THAT THESE LEO'S AREN'T THAT (edit: SILLY)].
They were in Ohio, with Dan Sayers.

They were in Norfolk, VA, with Chet Szymecki.

They were in the case involving customers at Tony's Pizza in Manassas, VA.

There are many cases out there where POWER is the operative word, not CRIME.
__________________
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Reports: CZ P01 pt1, pt2.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
“Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it.” -- Pericles
ccw9mm is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 08:57 AM   #44
Distinguished Member
 
Rob99VMI04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ABOVE is the FOOTPRINT of a common american CHICKEN
Posts: 1,615
Rob99VMI04
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texian View Post
To make serious allegations about LEOs without corroboration such as VCDL has done here is very disappointing. I think the members should refrain from joining this party until these officers have been shown to be guilty of misconduct. Otherwise it gives this forum the appearance of having serious prejudice against LEOs. JMO

Yeah!!!the problem with your question is the story legitamacy has pretty much been verified as true. VCDL run by Philip Van Cleave who IIRC may be a former Police Officer himself. He also holds his organzination in very high regard and over the last 5-8 years released alerts that in IIRC have never been wrong. The assumptions you made about this where the same assumptions most people made about the Alert when the Richmond police went to a gun show, watched people buy guns, and then went to that individuals neighborhood to tell their family members, neighbors that that person was at the gun show buying guns. I mean that just sounds SCI-FI; however, it was not. I hear you about the cop bashing however, I'm 90% that this story is accurate.

FN1910,
Just an FYI Teflon Coated bullets are not illegal in VA. They are only illegal if you have them in the commission of crime. Which wouldn't that make the gun illegal? Anyway, happy the magistrate asked.
__________________
"You may find me one day dead in a ditch somewhere. But by God, you'll find me in a pile of brass." - Trooper M. Padgett

"When seconds count.....Cops Respond in Minutes"
Rob99VMI04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 09:18 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
FN1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 1,136
FN1910
Quote:
FN1910,
Just an FYI Teflon Coated bullets are not illegal in VA. They are only illegal if you have them in the commission of crime. Which wouldn't that make the gun illegal? Anyway, happy the magistrate asked.
I am thinking about hollow points in NJ. Are teflon coated bullets hollow point? Wouldn't that defeat the supposedly reported purpose of the "Cop Killer" teflon coating to go through vests? Just wondering why a judge would make the jump from hollow point to teflon coated.
FN1910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 09:42 AM   #46
Distinguished Member
 
Rob99VMI04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ABOVE is the FOOTPRINT of a common american CHICKEN
Posts: 1,615
Rob99VMI04
Quote:
Originally Posted by FN1910 View Post
I am thinking about hollow points in NJ. Are teflon coated bullets hollow point? Wouldn't that defeat the supposedly reported purpose of the "Cop Killer" teflon coating to go through vests? Just wondering why a judge would make the jump from hollow point to teflon coated.
Teflon coated where said by the media to go through a vest. I've never seen any facts on if you take a 9mm 115 teflon coated bullet moving at the same speed as a 115 FMJ would have any differn't effect on todays armor. I think it was another media hype kind of like the "BLACK TALON" which by todays standards would not be shot out most peoples guns as a self defense load, expecially since they now have much better jacketed bonded projectiles that give a much more reliable expansion. I know a guy who shoots teflon coated lead bullets for practice, and in IDPA from the simple fact because there cheaper then jacketed stuff, plus he can run them through his Glock and not have to worry about the polygonal rifling, that he would have if he ran straight lead. Hes a reloader therefore he buys in volume and thats what he shoots.
__________________
"You may find me one day dead in a ditch somewhere. But by God, you'll find me in a pile of brass." - Trooper M. Padgett

"When seconds count.....Cops Respond in Minutes"
Rob99VMI04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 10:18 AM   #47
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 321
Jaystekan is a forum contributor
HMMM, Just checked my NC permit and there is no phone number on it. Not sure what number the judge was calling.
__________________
The pen is mightier than the sword — unless you are in a swordfight!
Jaystekan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2008, 12:45 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
FN1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 1,136
FN1910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaystekan View Post
HMMM, Just checked my NC permit and there is no phone number on it. Not sure what number the judge was calling.
Maybe you need to get yours check out. You probably have a fake own.
FN1910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 27th, 2008, 11:06 AM   #49
Member
 
Nozoki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 16
Nozoki
Quote:
The gun owner was pulled over for running through a red light, a
charge which the gun owner disputes.
A little off topic, but...
I was driving up to Maryland several years ago from central VA and I used Google maps to plot my course. Well it had me going right through D.C. to get there. I didn't know any better at the time. Anyway, it was getting to be pretty late at night and it started to pour down rain. So I was driving really slow because I couldn't see a thing and I was looking for street signs as I drove along. The road was pretty empty, and it was several lanes wide. I kept seeing these little red lights off to the side of the road on each side as I drove along and was wondering what they were. Then they turned green. I had gone through at least 10 red lights before I realized it. I had never seen street lights on the side on the road like that before, so I had no clue that's what they were. All I could see through the rain was the lights, not the poles.

So to bring it back on topic, I can understand if this guy drove past one of these street lights. He may not have even noticed it.
Nozoki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2008, 09:33 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 798
Sticks
Regarding the arrival of additional police...

Depending on the department, recent hires, and so on, I can believe it.

Possibility...All the first officer registered was "I am armed" and called backup. Arriving officers and supervisor may have realized the boo boo, and tried to salvage the situation by going forth and hoping the citizen would just roll over and take it.

I was detained a couple of years ago (11:30 PM) for "Suspicion of DUI" and two additional units arrived before the first officer got out of his vehicle, and a fourth arrived while he was walking the 10 yards to where I stopped/parked my bike (1/2 a block from my garage), key hanging off the right mirror, and my sitting side saddle smoking a cigarette clearly demonstrating that I was not a flight risk. Surrounded, grilled, Breathalyzered (0.0 much to the LEOs irritation), lectured on my riding practices for 35 minuets by some twit who I have been riding longer than he has been alive, and released with not even a warning of any infraction. Had I been ticked, it would have been a fun day in court.

So, multiple officers arriving on a minor traffic stop does not surprise me in the least. Compounding the situation...I too would like to hear more about this from official channels.

Had I been the citizen in the OP situation, I would have pushed the issue with the magistrate to have my gun and car returned then and now, no fees, and a verbal apology from the officers. Ticket me for the Red light, my bad, here is the money for the fine.
__________________
Sticks

Curiosity was framed, poor judgment killed the cat

911 is just part of the procedure for filing paperwork
Sticks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008