|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions Discussion regarding concealed carry licensing, issues, methods of concealment, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: College Station
Posts: 1,178
![]() |
I don't think that state sovereign issues apply. Congress has already passed a law that requires states to recognize permits held by retired police officers under certain conditions. So, if they can do that, they can do it for ordinary CCL permits.
This is an important issue from a practical standpoint. For example, I need to travel to MN from Texas. Unfortunately, I'm only good to go through Arkansas and Missouri/ Iowa is a no. I haven't checked but suspect MN is also No. A national carry law would make good sense provided that the permit's broader utility be tied to it being issued by the actual state of residence of the traveler. Will this happen? Doubtful. Immediately after the next election, and regardless of who wins, Congress will need to deal with very pressing huge issues which necessarily will take priority. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,531
![]() |
If something can be screwed up, the Federal Government will find a way. Most of us generally want LESS federal regulations and interference. A national concealed carry law would be a mess of exceptions and conditions.
__________________
Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever. http://miscmusings.townhall.com/ Who is John Galt? |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,141
![]() |
Honestly i want the " feds " away from my ccw . Now i think if they have any grunt to bear it should be treated just like a state drivers licence . but hey it only took them 40 years or so to get the " interstate compact " lol .
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 223
![]() |
As a libertarian I think we've got enough laws stomping our individual rights and I'd rather the government just stay out of my life... that said, the states not having automatic reciprocity is trampling my rights too... What's a guy to do?
__________________
The gunshot holds no fear...the bullet always tells the truth. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,526
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Land of Enchantment
Posts: 235
![]() |
Sounds like a great idea.
it sounds good to me, the only trick is getting it through congress before Bush leaves office.
__________________
"You lookin' for me Major?"
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Franklin County Pennsylvania
Posts: 939
![]() |
Hey I'm a libertarian too. I'd prefer there to be more pro-rights laws than anti rights laws.
__________________
America - The Constitutionalist Free Republic .45 Glock 36, 9mm Taurus PT111 Pro, Kel-Tec P3AT .380, Taurus 85 Revolver .38 Spc., 9mm EAA Witness, Savage .270, Savage .22, Mossburg Maverick 88 12 gauge, New England Pardner 12 gauge, WASR-10 AK-47, Mauser 98K 8mm and a Bushmaster M4A1 .223 |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 64
![]() |
I like the thought, infact I had this discussion with someone last night. We were talking about how a river seperates parts of Ohio and KY and you cross that and your in another state, but can't carry your gun in OH. Its a ridiculous thing b/c parts of OH are pretty bad. My arguement was how stupid is it that people are issued a liscense in KY at 16. They are then allowed to operate a two ton weapon in OH or KY or any other state. Yet an individual who has passes a qualification with a gun can't carry it concealed. Yet at the same time, you have to think back to when the states were actually created. States are obviously regulated and grandfathered by a federal government, but allowed to make their own decisions by a state government. By denying them the choice to deny users to carry concealed weapons in their state, takes away that states government ability to regulate itself. I still think its BS, but at the same time, its why I'm allowed to hunt with a rifle in KY and OH people aren't. You have to give and take a little.
__________________
Smith and Wesson Sigma 9mm Beretta 92FS 9mm Browning Buckmark 22LR Ruger Mark III Dexlue Competition Model 22LR. 1911 Soon. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: College Station
Posts: 1,178
![]() |
SD, don't write stuff like this :)
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 223
![]() |
That's what passes for a Zinger? That's a shame, as it was neither insightful nor witty. Oh well, whatever. The point is that I don't believe the goverment should be regulating these types of things at all, but if they passed the law it might actually be beneficial to my rights - which is kind of a quandry.
Sure, if I decided to change my views to something more like SelfDefense's and I decided that I did want the government to legislate every part of my life it would negate the quandry... but at what cost?
__________________
The gunshot holds no fear...the bullet always tells the truth. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|