Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Defensive Carry Discussions > Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions Discussion regarding concealed carry licensing, issues, methods of concealment, etc.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 3rd, 2006, 02:47 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Roadrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NW PA
Posts: 737
Roadrunner
Quote:
Originally Posted by P95Carry
On base I can easily understand but - to deny you any right of legal carry in your personal and private life away from base - that seems a serious breech of your basic rights. (emphasis added)
That's the Army's specialty. It's a legal order as far as I can see, a ridiculous one but still a legal order. Take it up with your Congressman, JAG office, and maybe the SGM of the Army, maybe it'll help. Beyond that, get the hell out of the Army (that's what I did).
__________________
- Kurt
“Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it.” ~Pericles of Athens
Primary Carry - Colt Commander .45 in a Brommeland Max-Con V
Roadrunner is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 02:48 PM   #12
Member
 
ka0azs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 103
ka0azs
Quote:
Originally Posted by P95Carry
Am I reading this bit right? Is this as I take it to be - stating that you would be barred from carry - anywhere, at all? On base I can easily understand but - to deny you any right of legal carry in your personal and private life away from base - that seems a serious breech of your basic rights.
Yep, you're reading it right. However, as I stated before, in the military you don't really have a personal or private life, away from or on base.

Active duty personnell don't give up all of their rights as citizens when they join up, but many of them are severely restricted or "suspended" while they are in the service. Politically related speech for example.

One of the biggest transitions I had to make when I left active duty was realizing I could tell my employer (legally that is, smart is another matter) to go to hell on any issue not related to my work hours on his property.
__________________
Randy
NRA Life Member
ka0azs is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 03:44 PM   #13
VIP Member
 
ExSoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coral Gables, FL
Posts: 4,856
ExSoldier
I tried to post something earlier but the dang thing wouldn't transmit, so I'll try again.

JUST DAMN Things have changed since I was on active duty as an officer in the early 1980s! Back then I had a CCW and used to carry on post but off duty. However, when the Red Brigades (terrorists) killed General Dozier in (IIRC) '83, all general staff officers were directed to carry an issue 45 in condition 2 at all times on post and CCW other times. At that time I served on the G4 (Logistics) staff of a two star. Life was good as an officer then. I couldn't take the PC BS today.

You MUST follow the orders and directives of the superiors above you! Civilians don't understand but yes the army can regulate your actions 24/7. Hey they make you cut your hair, right? Is that fair? To a civvie well...no. But there is a legitimate reason to the short hair rule. This crap is globalism at it's worst. But, it's not worth a BCD (Bad Conduct Discharge) that will ruin your entire life! Get out and don't look back.
__________________
Former Infantry Captain; 20 yrs as an NRA Certified Instructor; Avid practitioner of the martial art: KLIK-PAO.
ExSoldier is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 04:35 PM   #14
Member
 
duckhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 262
duckhunter
Getting a little defensive here, but not flaming anyone.

I just love how we are encouraging guys to get out of the Army (USN, USAF, USMC, USCG) because they don't agree with some of the regulations. Come on. If you really believed the recruiter when he told you it was going to be all milk and cookies in the military, you obviously didn't do a whole lot of research.

Contrary to popular belief, General Officers don't just sit around and think up ridiculous rules and regs - they are usually responding to a problem. Obviously there was a problem with this particular issue, but no-one has provided background on what it might be.

As I stated in a previous post, I don't agree with the reg. But bellyaching about having to follow the rules doesn't accomplish a whole lot. If the Army isn't for you, by all means get out. If you can't or won't follow the rules, I will help you get out.

Rant off.
__________________
"Speed is fine, but accuracy is final." - Bill Jordan
duckhunter is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 05:08 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Roadrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NW PA
Posts: 737
Roadrunner
duckhunter, no offense taken. I had no problem serving my four years. I'll be damned if I do any more. Some people don't have a problem with all of the rules and regulations. I do. I gave them four years of my life and don't regret it, I encourage others to do the same. I likewise thinks it's idiotic to stay in if all of the BS is more than you can handle.
__________________
- Kurt
“Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it.” ~Pericles of Athens
Primary Carry - Colt Commander .45 in a Brommeland Max-Con V
Roadrunner is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 05:34 PM   #16
Member
 
duckhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 262
duckhunter
I'm with you Roadrunner. I had a lot of guys in the same situation - tried my darndest to reup them, but they had done their job and wanted to move on to greener pastures. It is certainly a lifestyle decision as opposed to only a career decision.
__________________
"Speed is fine, but accuracy is final." - Bill Jordan
duckhunter is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 07:44 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
czman2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 612
czman2006
I'm a 20 year USN retiree, E-8, and while I agree there are some restrictions in any branch of the military, to tell a service member you can use a firearm to defend this country in Iraq (or elsewhere) but you can't defend yourself in the parking lot of the local WallyWorld is nonsense and should be challenged through the right channels. The military is definitely not for everyone but servicemembers still have the right to defend themselves and their loved ones, as do we all.
__________________
"Let not your heart be troubled." John 14:1

USN Retired Vietnam/Desert Shield/Desert Storm
czman2006 is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 07:56 PM   #18
Member
 
Airedale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 447
Airedale
Justin,
Let me give you some retired Sergeant Major advice.

Your sh*thouse lawyer buddy is an idiot. If the document you posted is legitimate, then do what it says.

If you must, visit your friendly JAG office and they will explain it's legality. I guarantee that it was staffed through the JAG and has been deemed appropriate.

The Commander isn't "bucking" for anything. At this point in his career, he has a pretty good idea whether he'll pin on a third star or not. Publishing a memorandum isn't going to get him promoted.

There is a reason for a restrictive action like this. Don't listen to the barracks experts. I can't begin to tell you how many troops I saw crash and burn following guidance from barracks lawyers.

If you violate this memorandum and get caught, tough luck.
Dave
Airedale is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 10:47 PM   #19
VIP Member
 
frankmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,498
frankmako
After 11 years as a Army Officer I can tell you one thing, follow the memo. Check with JAG for off base carry rules.
frankmako is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2006, 11:04 PM   #20
Member
 
Bags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atl
Posts: 86
Bags
Quote:
Originally Posted by fed_wif_a_sig
Ohhh it has plenty of jurisdiction...it covers every single member of the armed forces stationed, attached or assigned to HQ Army Alaska.

Its an order plain and simple and no matter what you want to do you MUST comply. Its the stupidest order I have ever seen given but its an order and as a soldier you are bound by the UCMJ to comply.

2nd, Immediately contact the NRA. I would reach out to them and see if they can do something about it. The contact info for the NRA Institute for Legislative Action at
NRA-ILA
11250 Waples Mill Road
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
800-392-8683 - Grassroots Hotline

But, I hope you're a member. Sucks to be you but an order is an order.

hmm.. this might not be a LEGAL order.... you don't have to follow illlegal orders.

There are 2 schools of thought.. define "around" and is there enough gray area for a lawyer to battle the case. I know this much, when fighting a general and the UCMJ, even if you win, you lose
Bags is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,


CopsPlus Police Equipment
Police Equipment at CopsPlus.com

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2009