|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions Discussion regarding concealed carry licensing, issues, methods of concealment, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 476
![]() |
Quote:
Not saying the limitation of currently-recognized rights to carry are reasonable or legal, even under the UCMJ, and I certainly think there's recourse, as you pointed out. But military members don't enjoy the same freedoms as civilians. Neither of us did when we served. And this case, orders must be followed until things are straightened out. -AX |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 612
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"Let not your heart be troubled." John 14:1 USN Retired Vietnam/Desert Shield/Desert Storm |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 476
![]() |
Quote:
Regardless of your perception of the matter, your 4th and 5th amendment rights, in particular, are abridged or limited by the military. Luckily, we both agree on what's to be done in this case, so I don't think there's need to hijack this thread further...keep safe yourself, and thanks for your service. -AX |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Lead Moderator
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 9,593
![]() |
When in the military you can be told what to wear of the military reservation. I served at Fort Ord, CA before it was closed. That was during the days when the work uniform was fatiques. The fatique uniform was never authorize nor acceptable for appearance in public off post. You could travel from post to your off post quarters and you could travel from your off post quarters to post in fatiques. If you stoppe for gas and got out of the car to pump it and were caught you could and would be punished.
Everybody who has served in the military in the last 50 years was given classes concerning what you was permissible for military personnel to say concerning the government, about political candidates and the political process. Making statements supporting a political candidate is a major offense and someone who does this is not punished with a slap on the hand. It is likely you would serve time for this.
__________________
George Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coral Gables, FL
Posts: 4,856
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Former Infantry Captain; 20 yrs as an NRA Certified Instructor; Avid practitioner of the martial art: KLIK-PAO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,693
![]() |
Justification is not the issue. The CG has the authority to publish the letter and make the policy. If you disobey you will face punishment under the UCMJ.
You may not like it but it is the law there. Don't risk the consequences, which may or may not be severe. Jerry |
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Battle Creek, Mi.
Posts: 1,924
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"The sword dose not cause the murder, and the maker of the sword dose not bear sin" Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac 11th century |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Lead Moderator
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 9,593
![]() |
Quote:
As for as prisions being reserved for felony offenders; I'm sure the two trainees who went to Leavenworth for beating up a 2LT would be glad to hear that. These two were tricked into gambling with this butterbar and as they were being transported back to their barracks they began to realize that they had been had. When they arrived they used just enough force to get their money and no more back. The sentence was 10 years each. The 2LT who violated a number of regs againt fraterization, gambling, etc. He got moved from being training officer in a training company to a do nothing job at brigade headquarters. As far as I know he never even got an oral reprimand. The old addage about messing up and moving up seemed to be in action. Never the less the charges against the two trainees would have been classified as misdemeanors in a civilian court and they ended up at Leavenworth. Strange things happen in the military. Of course the same thing can be said for the civilian world now.
__________________
George Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coral Gables, FL
Posts: 4,856
![]() |
Quote:
I was a screwy Looie once. And I screwed up a LOT. I used to say that my day was incomplete until I got at least one field grade a$$ chewing! As a general once told me, if Butterbars were perfect, they'd be commissioned as captains. 2LT is to screw up. 1LT is to screw up but less and not the same ones made as a 2LT. Captains are s'posed to get it right the first time. However any officer worth his salt will get it "right" IF he listens to his 1SG & CSM for political crap and his E7 platoon Sgt for everything else. But it's very true, in a situation like that and several I could describe from personal experience, the officer corps DOES take care of it's own. Sometimes it may take them a little bit of time to get "off the dime..." but they usually do.
__________________
Former Infantry Captain; 20 yrs as an NRA Certified Instructor; Avid practitioner of the martial art: KLIK-PAO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Lead Moderator
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 9,593
![]() |
Quote:
My first assignment as a 2LT out of officer basic was at Ft. Ord, CA as a training officer. Within one week my company commander was relieved. About 5 weeks into my assignment the 1ST was killed in an auto accident that was highly suspect. Although it was ruled an accident I have always felt that it was suicide. I was the survivor assistance officer and in process of doing that and a line of duty investigation I discovered at least two "wives" beside the one living on post. The one living on post was not legally his wife. He had just bought a large life insurance policy and had not even made the first month's premium. The company paid off double because of the accidental death and withheld the first month's premium. Only one other wife was dealt with. The other one who claimed to be the wife was fairly quickly dealt with. I did not include in my report the one in Korea or the one in Germany because they never came to the US. I was finally ordered to turn in both reports and they were both rejected. I was "instructed" to change my determination - I had determined that the woman living in Stockton, CA and not the one on post was the legal wife. The Army was not happy with that because the woman living on post had been allowed to live in military housing for about 12 years. I declined to change my determination and my battalion and brigade commanders backed me up. This was in late early 1972. When I left active duty in March 1974 the case was still open. Anyway inspite of one senior NCO messing up I still tried to get all the info and advice I could from my NCOs because they had much more experience than I did. I usually followed their advice. A few times I didn't and about 50% of the time I made the right choice there. Concerning the young man who originated this thread however; the only good and solid advice that can be offered to him is to obey orders and take the situation up with JAG. Anything other than that is playing a losing game and one that can cost him a whole lot more than he can afford.
__________________
George Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|