Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Defensive Carry Discussions > Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions Discussion regarding concealed carry licensing, issues, methods of concealment, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 3rd, 2009, 03:04 AM   #31
VIP Member
 
TN_Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West TN
Posts: 7,720
TN_Mike
Nope. I am absolutely, 100%, COMPLETELY against the Feds getting involved in carry in any way shape or form. Not even limited. Not optional. Not nothing!

Read my signature line and you will plainly see my feelings.
__________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. -Barry Goldwater 1968
TN_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 02:35 PM   #32
Member
 
sixsccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 28
sixsccw
That'll teach me to spew all over my keyboard and submit something without proof-reading it. I guess I can see where I may have misrepresented myself -

Rather than address everyone individually, I'll just go for a general clarification. If I didn't care dearly about this issue, I wouldn't bother.

- I picked the $500 as an arbitrary figure to emphasize the widespread enthusiasm I believe people would show if those who live in "may issue" states were offered more of a chance at CCW. That figure is obviously too high.
- None of the amendments, just as none of the Commandments, were ever intended to be implemented and mindlessly abided by at face value. The intent of the Founders has to be understood, and it seems our modern society has spawned a lot of issues the Fathers wouldn't have dreamed of. In a country where it seems everyone either IS a therapist or is SEEING one, some stricter regulation of CCWs may be in order.
And that's the point - right now, an awful lot of the "shall issue" states are handing out CCWs with such ease, that a document that carries grave responsibilities sometimes resembles a fishing license. I’d like to see the CCW represent more.
While I was waiting for my CCW, I thoroughly researched NY's Article 35 of the penal code so that I would understand the use of deadly force. I also took a 10-hour live-fire training course on CCW, night shooting and tactical handgun. And I will continue this training.
But it should be mandatory.

One of your responses does require a direct rebuttal - Majorlk, who said "You'd make a great spokesman for the anti movement." For your sake, and to anyone else who doubts my rabid dedication to our 2nd Amendment rights, I offer the next post which are excerpts from my letter to the judge who issued my CCW. My support of our gun rights is beyond question, and I’m sure I am in good company judging from what I’ve seen and learned on this fine site.

Thanks
Six
__________________
"I come in peace, I didn't bring artillery. But I am pleading with you with tears in my eyes: If you ---- with me, I'll kill you all."

Marine Corps General James Mattis, to Iraqi tribal leaders
sixsccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 02:35 PM   #33
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 60
aikidoka
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnKelly View Post
Why couldn't it work like a driver's license? Not federally issued, but any state will honor any other state DL. So the federal government could pass a law - not one that allowes federal permits to be issued but instead requires all states to recognize reciprocity of CCW's. So Illinois would by law *have* to honor a Kentucky CCDW permit, heh.
And Indiana's which doesn't define how one has to carry. OC baby! haha
aikidoka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 02:36 PM   #34
Member
 
sixsccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 28
sixsccw
And here it is – I’m sure everyone here feels as I do about our God-given rights:

“Dear Judge (Deleted);

“As a responsible and law-abiding citizen who hopes to soon be a permit holder and pistol owner, I consider the issuance of an unrestricted concealed carry permit by the State of New York to be the highest honor and privilege that can be entrusted to such an individual. It is therefore appropriate and correct that I endeavor to rise to that honor; my entry into handgun ownership would be half-hearted if I did not. I am keenly aware that this type of privilege carries substantial weight, substance and duty.”

“I have heard “self defense” used as justification for concealed carry, but I am not entirely at ease with that characterization. I believe you and I, as men, are not programmed to defend only ourselves – our most noble instinctual trait is that we are programmed to defend others, to protect, and to serve the greater good first and our own safety second. As such, it is only natural and proper for us, and in fact required of us, to seek the tools that enhance our ability to uphold this innate duty. Indeed, as George F. Will wrote after the 9-11 attacks, “Public safety is the public’s business. Public authorities take the lead, and some work at it full-time. However, at all times, and especially times like these, it is every citizen’s business.”

“When I ponder all this, I am reminded of two notable incidents from our country’s past. Everyone remembers the horrible events in 1999 in Littleton, Colorado. Two murderous shooters marched unchallenged through a school, the principal being helpless, while the SWAT team sadly arrived too late. But very few recall when, two years earlier in Pearl, Mississippi, a high school vice principal heard gunshots in the hallway of the school (this time from a lone shooter), and dashed to his car and retrieved his licensed pistol. He then bravely and selflessly ran back to stop the shooter and hold him for the police.”

“Similar stories of citizens using personal firearms in the purpose of defense are quite numerous. Still, I hasten to add that I am aware an armed citizen’s rights to act in defense of oneself or of another are heavily and rightly restricted. I only use the above example to say that as men, it’s only right for us to pray that if we are ever faced with such an emergency, that each of us would have the chance and fortitude to aspire to be the vice principal from Pearl rather than the unfortunate helpless souls in Littleton.”
__________________
"I come in peace, I didn't bring artillery. But I am pleading with you with tears in my eyes: If you ---- with me, I'll kill you all."

Marine Corps General James Mattis, to Iraqi tribal leaders
sixsccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 03:23 PM   #35
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 179
Keltyke
Quote:
And that's the point - right now, an awful lot of the "shall issue" states are handing out CCWs with such ease, that a document that carries grave responsibilities sometimes resembles a fishing license. I’d like to see the CCW represent more.
I couldn't agree more!!! In some states, it's far, far too easy to obtain a permit, and a few states don't require one at all. Although I'm NOT an advocate of gun control, I'd like to see some standards enacted for people who want to carry (and possible use) deadly force. As a basis, I'd like to see a handgun handling/safety course. A half day should be enough to teach anyone how to safely carry, store, and clean handgun. I'd also like to see a course like is in place here in SC. It's an all day, 8 hour treatment of SC handgun laws, including where you can carry and when you can shoot. There's also a 50 round proficiency segment at ranges from 15 yards down to 5. There's a 60% (?) requirement there (I think it should be more like 90%).

It's not about control, it's about safety.
Keltyke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 03:27 PM   #36
Member
 
Xader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 225
Xader
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Warrior View Post
Gay Marriage may be great in weirdo states but we do not want it recognized in Ohio.
Bashing is not welcome.

Quote:
General Rules:

1. Although we have a number of other forums here, we are primarily focused on concealed carry. Threads and posts should be related to the individual forum's focus.

2. While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks or purposeless inflammatory posts or PMs. Trolling, flaming, and personal attacks are strictly prohibited. You are welcome to disagree with opinions other than your own, but flaming other members will not be allowed. If you can't figure out how to compose a post without it being confrontational or a personal attack on someone, simply bite your lip
and don't post it.


3. Each member is allowed one account. Multiple user account registrations for one individual are not permitted. We have tools designed to detect multiple accounts and, when discovered, we reserve the right to delete, revoke or merge any or all of these accounts, without further notice.

4. As a family-friendly forum, we ask that you keep your language clean, exactly as we hope you would when addressing respected elders. Creative workarounds (the use of special characters to replace some letters) on language are not allowed. Violators of this rule will be warned once; those repeatedly breaking this rule will have their accounts permanently revoked. NOTE: Links to off site material will be held to our family-friendly standard, as well.

5. We have a number of female members on the forum and hope to attract more for their unique perspective and experiences. We do not, however, have "gender specific" forums. They are regarded as individuals that carry a concealed weapon that just happen to be female. They will not be subjected to sexual innuendo as a part of their membership. Be warned, there is zero tolerance regarding this particular rule.

6. We do not discriminate in regards to religion, race, creed, gender, sexual preference, or national origin, nor will we tolerate, on this forum, those that do. Racial, ethnic, or religious slurs appearing in posts will be removed.

7. Multiple or repeated posting in order to increase your post count is not allowed. The posting of meaningless threads, one word (or short) nonsense posts, including links off-site the forum are assumed to be for that reason. "Bumping" a thread is not allowed.

8. Spamming is not allowed and will result in having your account removed. This includes using the forum email and Private Message system to spam other members privately. Any member receiving this type of PM or email, should immediately notify forum staff.

9. We have learned from bitter experience that discussions of certain subjects (politics, religion, abortion, sexual orientation, etc) often degenerate quickly. For this reason, we prohibit these subjects in our discussions. We also discourage "caliber wars" and the virtues of "open carry" topic; strongly encouraging you to take these discussions to other forums where these topics are the focus.

10. Discussion of illegal activities except in reporting the actions of others is not allowed. Discussion for the purpose of promoting these activities may subject the poster to being banned. Admission of illegal activity on your part will be removed or the poster will given the opportunity to edit their admission out of the post. Anyone quoting or referencing deleted or edited posts will have their posts edited/removed as well. In short, DO NOT use this forum to admit to breaking the law.

11. While we have no problem with you mentioning another forum or posting an occasional link to a particular thread in another forum, we do not allow either blatant advertising or bashing other boards/forums. Those violating this rule are subject to having all previous links removed from this forum.

12. Those using, or attempting to use, an anonymous proxy to either register or access this forum will be banned, without notice, warning or discussion.

While these rules cover most common situations, we cannot anticipate everything. Consequently we reserve the right to take any actions we deem appropriate to ensure these forums are not disrupted or abused in any way. Posts that are contrary to the above policies or to the mission of DefensiveCarry.com, or violate our community standards may be edited or deleted at our sole discretion. We're a private venture enabled by an all-volunteer staff and forum Administrators and/or Moderators shall make the final decision on what does/does not violate community standards.
__________________
"Life is an excellent teacher; unfortunately, it kills all of its students."
Xader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 03:36 PM   #37
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 11
Louis
I respect your opinions on gun safety, but the Second Amendment was not written so that those people determined to be safe by the government could keep and bear arms. It is a basic right that predates the Constitution. I believe John Lott's first book concluded that training was not correlated with accidents. The ADs for which I have personal knowledge were by very well trained people. If we fall into the training trap we allow the government camel to get its nose under the tent.
Louis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 05:55 PM   #38
Member
 
Grant48's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 140
Grant48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
What about a National CCW option?
No thanks. When the federal government gets involved in the regulation of anything, over time the laws tend to become MORE restrictive, not less.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tns0038 View Post
It would mean that all states could stop issuing nonresident CCL. There would be no point since the state your traveling too, would be required to accept the one you have from your own state.
Not so fast... non-resident permits would still be very necessary. If national reciprocity came about, there's no guarantee that states that currently do not issue permits would have to start issuing. For example, what about residents of Illinois or Wisconsin, where CCW permits do not exist? Or states like California, New York, Maryland, etc where permits are very difficult (if not practically impossible) to receive?

Without non-resident permits, out-of-staters could carry anywhere, but residents of certain states would still be unable to do so.
Grant48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 06:53 PM   #39
Member
 
sixsccw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 28
sixsccw
From Keltyke – “I'd also like to see a course like is in place here in SC. It's an all day, 8 hour treatment of SC handgun laws, including where you can carry and when you can shoot. There's also a 50 round proficiency segment at ranges from 15 yards down to 5. There's a 60% (?) requirement there (I think it should be more like 90%).”

Thanks for the input, sir - How ironic is it that NY is so notoriously tough on gun owners, yet SC runs things like they ought to be? It's exactly what I'm talking about.

From Grant48 – “Without non-resident permits, out-of-staters could carry anywhere, but residents of certain states would still be unable to do so.”

Yep.

Six
__________________
"I come in peace, I didn't bring artillery. But I am pleading with you with tears in my eyes: If you ---- with me, I'll kill you all."

Marine Corps General James Mattis, to Iraqi tribal leaders
sixsccw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2009, 07:10 PM   #40
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 24
CommonMan101
Exclamation

We already have a National Permit.

All these regs and such need to go away. To save myself the headache of trying to put it into words that everyone can understand I'll let Ted speak for me:

Ted Nugent: “I believe that a person's moral compass can be determined by how he references free men the right to defend themselves. The second amendment is so obvious to me, its insane that there is an argument. Let’s pretend there is no document. Let’s pretend brave families didn’t leave the tyrants and slave drivers of Europe, so that they could practice the religion of their choice, they could speak out without being murdered, that they could produce wool without the King’s men coming and taking it from them every season of harvest. Lets pretend none of this happened. Lets just pretend that this guy named Ted Nugent, parachuted down to earth and woke up one morning and saw all of these wonderful resources and had dreams of excellence and being the best that I could be. I don’t need a document and I don’t need another man to explain to me that I have the right to defend my gift of life. And that there is an argument in America from Hilary Clinton, from Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, from a whole gaggle of numbnuts, who would try to tell me they will dictate where how and if, I can defend myself. I find that preposterous, I find that unacceptable and I will not accept it. I am a free man, DON’T Tread on Me, a good law abiding citizen, not convicted of a felony. The 2nd amendment of our bill of rights is my concealed weapons permit. PERIOD. That’s it.

-------------
Stop the insanity! You're giving the grabbers what they want by playing on their field of "control" with this permit stuff! You've already given in to the idea of gun control now it's just a matter of how much and how far until it's all gone.

Keep
It
Simple
Sweetie!
CommonMan101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,


CopsPlus Police Equipment
Police Equipment at CopsPlus.com

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2009