Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Defensive Carry Discussions > Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions Discussion regarding concealed carry licensing, issues, methods of concealment, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 5th, 2009, 05:32 PM   #71
Member
 
unloved's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 245
unloved
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM2024 View Post
Is this merely your opinion or is this a fact? Forgive me if I don't take your word for it, but I'd like to see some links to prove your point.
And here are more. LEOs are better trained than us armed citizens, right?
Off-Duty Police Officer Shoots and Kills Friend While Demonstrating Weapon (NY)
Baltimore: Off duty LEO draws in haunted house

Another licensed citizen in a state that requires training.
man with concealed handgun carry permit slays family

If I were so inclined, I could fill pages with links. The fact is, states that require training for citizens have just as many incidents of licensees committing crimes, licensees shooting when not justified, and licensees involved in firearms accidents as states that don't require training.

LEOs are more likely to miss their target and hit bystanders than armed citizens are. They're as likely to shoot mistakenly, or unjustifiably.

I have never heard of a legally armed citizen in a justified shooting hitting an innocent bystander. I'm not claiming that it has never happened, but I think the fact that we don't hear Paul Helmke constantly cheering about it is a pretty good indication that it happens rarely, if at all.

My statement that mandatory training accomplishes nothing may have been a little strong. If some people truly learn stuff, that's great. However,mandatory training absolutely does not reduce the number of problems. So, what good is it? Why should people be forced to spend time and money on something that does not accomplish the goal that it is supposed to? It's supposed to make everyone 'safer'. It doesn't. It's ridiculous and I can't believe that so many are willing to not only put up with it, but want to force it on others.
__________________
...he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe are the laws of nature. - George Bernard Shaw (paraphrased)

Last edited by unloved; November 5th, 2009 at 09:38 PM.. Reason: Typo
unloved is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 5th, 2009, 09:13 PM   #72
Member
 
Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 333
Bart
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo View Post
Not debating what is fact or not as I have not studied them enough to be able to debate them. Simply stating that people with no working knowledge of a gun that carry a gun scare me and I consider them to be just as much of a threat as a BG.
I had working knowledge of a gun when I was 10 yrs. old. I loaded it, aimed it at the target and squeezed the trigger. I've been doing the same thing for over 50 yrs. Do you possess some knowledge that I don't?
Bart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 06:22 PM   #73
Member
 
basher052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond TX
Posts: 121
basher052
Quote:
Originally Posted by unloved View Post
LEOs are more likely to miss their target and hit bystanders than armed citizens are. They're as likely to shoot mistakenly, or unjustifiably.
Do you have a stat to back this claim up? Im not saying its true or not true, but thats a pretty bold statement to make without any supporting documentation.
__________________
Andy

When governments fear people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. Thomas Jefferson wwwdotcom.com

Last edited by basher052; November 6th, 2009 at 06:23 PM.. Reason: poor grammar...bad bad bad
basher052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 09:24 PM   #74
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 48
wormtown
At the risk of encouraging further inflammatory responses:

Quote:
I had working knowledge of a gun when I was 10 yrs. old. I loaded it, aimed it at the target and squeezed the trigger. I've been doing the same thing for over 50 yrs. Do you possess some knowledge that I don't?
It depends if your knowledge extends to retention techniques, how to move to cover, order of engagement of threats, threat assessment, moving to cover, proper use of cover, emerging from cover, clearing around obstacles, tactical reloads (how and when), rapid malfunction clearing, and that's just for starters. If you know this and more, than I don't possess some knowledge (and practiced skills) you don't. If you think the above aren't useful or necessary, you may be right, but I'd rather know and not need than need and not know.
wormtown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 10:01 PM   #75
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: S. Oregon (aka Paradise)
Posts: 20
PaxMentis
Quote:
Originally Posted by basher052 View Post
Do you have a stat to back this claim up? Im not saying its true or not true, but thats a pretty bold statement to make without any supporting documentation.
"About 11% of police shootings kill an innocent person - about 2% of shootings bycitizens kill an innocent person. The odds of a defensive gun user killing an innocent person are less than 1 in 26,000"

http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-fa...5.1-screen.pdf

Top of page 48...the footnote is to: Shall Issue: The New Wave of Concealed Handgun Permit Laws, C. Cramer, and D. Kopel,
Independence Institute Issue Paper. October 17, 1994

One would have to track down that paper to find the methodology I suppose..
PaxMentis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 10:39 PM   #76
Member
 
unloved's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 245
unloved
Quote:
Originally Posted by basher052 View Post
Do you have a stat to back this claim up?
Sure, here you go.
__________________
...he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe are the laws of nature. - George Bernard Shaw (paraphrased)
unloved is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 10:54 PM   #77
Member
 
basher052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond TX
Posts: 121
basher052
Quote:
Originally Posted by unloved View Post
Oh sweet Google do-hicky.....thanks for the url too.
__________________
Andy

When governments fear people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. Thomas Jefferson wwwdotcom.com
basher052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 10:59 PM   #78
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: West Carrollton, Ohio
Posts: 138
Cold Warrior
We all fear those few sensational incidents that are bound to happen, like car wrecks and airplane crashes, concerning mistakes made by CCW people that will be good for TV "news" and maybe even worth a minute or two. This will be out of a population of 305 million people in the USA, by the way. I cringe when I think about a mad mean CCW woman who wants to get her revenge on men.
Cold Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2009, 10:59 PM   #79
Member
 
unloved's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 245
unloved
Quote:
Originally Posted by basher052 View Post
Oh sweet Google do-hicky.....thanks for the url too.
Yeah, it's fun isn't it?
__________________
...he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe are the laws of nature. - George Bernard Shaw (paraphrased)
unloved is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 7th, 2009, 06:42 AM   #80
Member
 
Bart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 333
Bart
Quote:
Originally Posted by wormtown View Post
At the risk of encouraging further inflammatory responses:



It depends if your knowledge extends to retention techniques, how to move to cover, order of engagement of threats, threat assessment, moving to cover, proper use of cover, emerging from cover, clearing around obstacles, tactical reloads (how and when), rapid malfunction clearing, and that's just for starters. If you know this and more, than I don't possess some knowledge (and practiced skills) you don't. If you think the above aren't useful or necessary, you may be right, but I'd rather know and not need than need and not know.
The subject didn't extend beyond "Having Working Knowledge Of A Gun". However, the training, techniques, and practiced skills, etc., that people think they so desperately need today, was considered simple common sense when it came to being armed for self defense when I was growing up. If someone lacks common sense, and think that they need all of the training you mention to feel qualified enough to conceal carry, then I agree with you and they should by all means acquire such. I hope my response is not too inflammatory, it's not my intention to inflame anything , just respond.
Bart is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 AM.


bestBest selection of rifle scopes, holsters, belts, pouches, gun accessories, gun cases, dry boxes, flashlights, night vision, binoculars, sunglasses. Information and 1000's of military, law enforcement, tactical gear from OpticsPlanet and Tactical Store w/ FREE UPS! Top brands - 5.11, Bianchi, BlackHawk, Bushnell, EOT ech, Leupold, Pelican, Galco, Fobus, Safariland, Steiner, StreamLight, SureFire, Nikon, Trijicon, UnderArmour, Uncle Mike's, Wiley X,


CopsPlus Police Equipment
Police Equipment at CopsPlus.com

Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2009