|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 199
![]() |
My MK9 will shoot anything, but I carry Federal Hydra-Shok+P+124s.
__________________
...one jagged hole! |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: anywhere there is an H&K
Posts: 129
![]() |
+1 on the Corbon DPX if your 19 likes 'em. Expensive, yeah, but man they get the JOB done.
__________________
"THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman" Thomas Paine " The Crisis " |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 438
![]() |
shoot many, pick one don't concern yourself with weight if your gun won't shoot it don't use it.
I shoot 147gr because my gun doesn't like anything lighter so I don't like anything lighter. Leave the ballistics to the manufactures shoot what works. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UTAH
Posts: 83
![]() |
Really, any of the high end jacketed bullets will work well. Like everyone else said, pick one that goes bang every time and FEEDS well in your gun.
Personally I shoot corbon or golden sabers. One gun likes the Corbon, the other likes the golden sabers. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 6,693
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: san antonio
Posts: 27
![]() |
With all the info. on this forum, if you still haven't gone out and got you some boxes of the top 4, I think you're just stuck in the advertising vortex. There are numerous reports, reviews, and comparisons to make a resonable choice. There is more than enough info in this forum alone to create an ammo bible. I think I speak for the masses when I say we can put this one to bed. As said by many, many, (1) Reliability (2) Functionality, (3)anything else
__________________
Kenny G is allowed to live because Chuck Norris doesn't kill women. http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 36
![]() |
I carry 147 grain Speer GoldDots.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 87
![]() |
I have heard mention that the 147 gr. doesn't perform well. Does anyone know what that is about, or is it another myth? I went with 147 gr. but 127 doesn't sound bad either. I just need to buy a bunch and go to the range and see what works best.
__________________
"The best compliment to the Warrior is that others feel safe while you are around." I would add especially if they REALLY ARE safe when you are around. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southwest
Posts: 466
![]() |
Hello. The bad reputation with 147's seems to have come from the performance of the early generation of this weight bullet. As best as I remember, the 147's original aim was to provide accuracy at extended distances relative to the HK MP5 smg. As you likely know, hollow point bullets are often among the more accurate and the original intention was to provide accuracy with expansion a secondary consideration, if any.
After the Miami Fiasco in which a killer was shot, receiving a "non-survivable wound" from an FBI agent's 115-gr. 9mm STHP, terminal performance protocols were developed by the FBI for various calibers...including 9mm. Penetration requirements of 12" in 10% ballistic gelatin were easily met by the 147grain JHP by not so easily by the aggressive 115-gr. JHP's of the same era. The early 147-gr. JHP bullets often expanded sporadically if at all, but the bullet manufacturers reworked the design for this bullet weight and as the saying goes, "the worm has turned." I have not been a fan of the 147-gr. JHP in 9mm, but recent informal tests of currently offered loads have forced me to re-examine my position. Though I still prefer faster rounds like 115-gr. DPX +P or Winchester 127-gr. +P+, I have yet to see a Golden Saber, Winchester Ranger, or Gold Dot in the 147-gr. weight fail to expand. I would not be afraid to use these for serious purpose. Such might not have been the case ten or fifteen years ago, but in my opinion, the 147-gr. 9mm hollow point is now a viable option. Best. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 6,871
![]() |
I prefer a good 124 - 127 grain +P or +P+ JHPs.
I really like Double Tap Ammo, but in fairness, I haven't tried it in 9mm. My current 9mm ammo consists of Speer Gold Dot 124 grain standard pressure and Winchester Ranger-T 124 grain +P JHP (RA9124TP).
__________________
USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947 |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: indiana usa
Posts: 807
![]() |
Accuracy and reliability. I have a springfield xdsc 9mm. And it works with remington golden sabers in 124 +p loadings.
Sixgun |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1
![]() |
9mm 147Grn. Ranger
I'm in Law Enforcement and about two weeks ago a friend of mine while we were at work encountered an armed thug. I had wondered about the 147Grn. round, as thats what our department issues for carry. My friend took a .357 Rd. to his chest from a .357 revolver the thug was carrying. Thank God his vest did its job and stopped it, although he had some major bruising. He returned fire, hit the guy in the hip, and in the chest. The 147 did its job, the guy went down, and didn't get back up. He was sent to meet his maker. The guy was wearing a jacket, with a shirt underneath, and the 147 penetrated with no problem. I thank God it did, and he had his vest on, (and it worked). I have since improved my confidence of the 147Grn. I hear alot of other guys in the dept. complain about the ammo we carry, but it proved itself a couple weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,425
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: indiana usa
Posts: 807
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Assistant Administrator
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,468
![]() |
Quote:
.......... "That proves the 9mm can be an effective round." I carry 9mm and place plenty enough faith in it with good placement but I am still aware that no caliber carries any guarantees! This result was tho pleasantly reassuring ![]()
__________________
Chris - P95 NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member. "To own a gun and assume that you are armed is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!." If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: kansas
Posts: 298
![]() |
After trying several defensive loads, it was clear that my glock 26 shot more accurately with rem golden sabers.
__________________
Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything Wyatt Earp |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 660
![]() |
The 147gr Winchester Ranger-T has performed exceptional in gelatin tests. Glad to hear it worked as designed in that real-life situation previously posted. In shorter barrel 9s I prefer using 124gr +p loads. I currently carry Ranger T 124gr +p in my PM9. Although, I would not be adverse to using 147gr loads (GDs or Rangers) esp. in longer barrel guns. The following info was taken from Tactical Forums:
The following loads all demonstrate outstanding terminal performance and can be considered acceptable for duty/self-defense use: 9 mm: Barnes XPB 105 & 115 gr JHP (copper bullet) Federal Tactical 124 gr JHP (LE9T1) Speer Gold Dot 124 gr +P JHP (53617) Winchester Ranger-T 124 gr +P JHP (RA9124TP) Winchester Partition Gold 124 gr JHP (RA91P) Winchester Ranger-T 127 gr +P+ JHP (RA9TA) Federal Tactical 135 gr +P JHP (LE9T5) Federal HST 147 gr JHP (P9HST2) Remington Golden Saber 147 gr JHP (GS9MMC) Speer Gold Dot 147 gr JHP (53619) Winchester Ranger-T 147 gr JHP (RA9T) From StoppingPower.net: 10% Ballistic Gelatin Tests for: Winchester 9mm 147 gr Ranger RA9T Testing Platform: Glock 19 Barrier: Four Layers of Denim TEST RESULTS: Round # 1: Penetration: 11.875” Recovered Weight: 150.4 gr. Expansion*: .646 cal. * Expansion measured at widest point. Last edited by slimjim; January 20th, 2007 at 12:57 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: State of Discombobulation
Posts: 4,034
![]() |
My three 9's are loaded with either Corbon 125 grain +p's or 115 grain +P DPX.
The DPX has great barrier penetration and the 125's seem to be the cat's meow if you aren't dealing with barriers. Biker ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: indiana usa
Posts: 807
![]() |
Quote:
Sixgun |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montgomery,TX
Posts: 7
![]() |
I Carry a Baby Eagle 9mm. Im kinda in a bind, so any input would help..My gun seems to be "Ammo Picky"..trust me yall, ive tried em all. from GD 124g,Golden Saber 147,Hornady TAP 124,Fed. Hydra-Shok 124, To Win. SXT Supremes,ETC. My Main problem is: When i pull the slide back to load it, the bullet gets jammed!! not good at all. I narrowed it down to Hydrashoks, due to ballistics & what i THOUGHT would feed proper @ first. Some feed well & reliable, TAPS get jammed everytime (theyre a little shorter) But Still !! Dont get me wrong here, If my gun is breached & i put in the clip & quick release the slide...everything works!! But, if it came down to it, I doubt an intruder would give me time to do all that!!! Im a Newbie, & am learning, but i think it would be more helpful to find out answers sooner, rather than the hard way......Could it be the slide,barrel,magazine, or the ammo like i started with?
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|