|
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Donations | DefensiveCarry Store | DefensiveCarry Gallery | USGO Gallery | Related Links | Forum Help & Extras |
| Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orange Park, Fla.
Posts: 997
![]() |
2.5 or 3 inch 410's
I am seriously considering acquiring a Taurus Judge. The original will handle a 2.5 inch 410 shotgun shell but the latest model will take a 3" shell and costs a bit more. What advantage would the 3" have over the 2.5"?
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence in their behalf. - George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 19
![]() |
taurus judge
I'VE heard that they have made some 3inher but the ATF put a stop to it for now.they are checking to see if infact that it is legal.They don't like the 3inch for some reason.that what heard not sure if it is a fact or not.I have one 2.5 and just love it would like cet it in a 3inch.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,730
![]() |
I was told is that they both have the same powder charge, but the longer round has more brass. You get more shot with less velocity with the longer round. 2nd hand info from some dude at a gunshop.
__________________
Stupidity is not a crime...so you are free to go. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Distinguished Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,468
![]() |
Well, well, well. The ATF up to sniffing around once again.
I cannot WAIT to hear what passes for its "rationale" on this one. What "violation" of which "regulations" (or, more likely, since it probably doesn't violate any valid, CURRENT regs), which "interpretations" of which regs a 3-inch chamber violates that a 2 1/2-inch chamber doesn't violate. Methinks I should hang on REAL tight to my 2 1/2-incher, 'cause useful (and novel) though the gun is, despite its faults (there are better weapons for each purpose to which it can be placed), the Feds might just wanna come and get it. Remember the "Street Sweeper"? I was going to try and get one of those 3-inchers, with a 2 1/2-inch barrel, stainless finish. Now Big Brother has decided that extra half inch in the chambers on the cylinder is a threat to Western Civilization somehow. Rant off.
__________________
"...bad decisions that turn out well often make heroes." Gary D. Mitchell, A Sniper's Journey: The Truth About the Man and the Rifle, P. 103, NAL Caliber books, 2006, 1st Ed. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 4,584
![]() |
Get the 3" for a slightly denser pattern
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC/NY
Posts: 17
![]() |
If your shooting buckshot, the extra length will allow for a few more pellets (as Cupcake said). I shoot 3-inch 000 Buck in my Thunder Five and get 5 .36 cal balls per trigger pull. the 2.5-inch has only 3 of them. I think its the same for the 00 Buck, not sure.
--Dave |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|