Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 10th, 2008, 10:49 PM   #1
Member
 
MountainPacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 168
MountainPacker
.380 ACP, FMJ or JHP

In a .32 auto, I'd definately go FMJ for penetration. In a 9mm, I'd definately (and do) go for a JHP. What about .380?

I was looking at Double Tap's 90gr. JHP at 1,000fps from a P3AT. Will a 90gr. bullet at that velocity penetrate, or just immediately expand and throw on the brakes?
MountainPacker is offline  
Old February 10th, 2008, 11:46 PM   #2
Member
 
edw8ri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Old North State
Posts: 68
edw8ri is a forum contributor
I use CorBon JHP in .32acp. I know most people don't think much of this little cartridge. But remember this: World War I was started by a .32 and World War II ended in Europe with a .32.

WWI was triggered when a terrorist shot the heir to the Austrian throne and his wife as they were riding in an open car. Both died.

A .32 is probably not the round the modern shooter would use for such a shot today, but it worked. The shots could not have been point blank. In other words, the range would have been a bit longer than what we think of in terms of a self defense situation today. And the rounds used were most likely unjacketed lead bullets, and not nearly as hot as a modern self-defense round. While neither the Crown Prince nor his wife died instantly, both were incapacitated and died shortly thereafter.

Hitler killed himself with a .32, ending the war in Europe. So for a little round, the .32 has played a major role in history.

As to JHP vs. FMJ, I have never seen ballistics information to suggest that a .32JHP will not penetrate. I have heard people offer that opinion and it seems to be the conventional wisdom. But conventional wisdom is not always right. "You can't loose money investing in internet stocks... real estate is a guaranteed money maker, etc."

A Winchester .32 FMJ round is travelling at 905 fps. A CorBon .32 JHP is travelling at 1050 fps. Sure the CorBon is going to expand, but at that speed it should certainly penetrate. At least I think that it will, and until I can find some testing data that indicates otherwise, that is what I will continue to use.
edw8ri is offline  
Old February 10th, 2008, 11:51 PM   #3
Member
 
rhinokrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 352
rhinokrk
Golden Saber 102 gr. for the 380.
__________________
Get the U.N. out of the U.S.
Get the U.S. out of the U.N.
rhinokrk is online now  
Old February 10th, 2008, 11:58 PM   #4
EW3
Member
 
EW3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 492
EW3
Corbon DPX .380
__________________

Palin-Petraeus '12
EW3 is offline  
Old February 11th, 2008, 12:38 AM   #5
Member
 
jackdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dover,tn
Posts: 222
jackdog
alternating rounds 380 ball, Jhp,ball, JHP
__________________
Jack dog
jackdog is offline  
Old February 11th, 2008, 01:01 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 249
chuck brick
As far as I have been able to find, the .380 may or may not penetrate and expand. It isn't a 9mmPara., even if it does share the diameter. I load my .380's with "Dutch Loads" of alternating FMJ and Ranger SXT loads; I figure that if either may be effective or either may fail to perform, I'll hedge my bets and hope that both don't fail to perform under the same conditions. Maybe both will work as hoped! Shoot them to the ground. It doesn't matter which ones are working (either, neither, or both!), just keep on shooting until the threat is over, you have no more reloads, or the BG is delayed because he has to dig his way through a mound of hot brass to achieve his original intent.
With the .32, I just go for penetration: FMJ. I used to do the "dutch loads" thing with this one like with the .380 until I found out about the "Semi-Rimmed" brass, and the resulting "Rim-Lock" problem that can result. Above all else, I value dependability of function.

The two loudest sounds in life: "Click" when you expect a Bang, and "Bang" when you don't expect it. AD's and FTF's. I don't know that either one "sucks" more than the other. One can get you killed, and the other can kill unintentially. Personally, I deliberately choose against either one.

Stay safe,

Chuck Brick.
__________________
Why do I use 230 gr. for my .45acp?
Because I can't find a source of 250 gr!
http://chucksrantings.blogspot.com/
chuck brick is offline  
Old February 11th, 2008, 04:00 AM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Over here
Posts: 246
Whyveear
FMJ
Whyveear is offline  
Old February 11th, 2008, 04:10 AM   #8
Assistant Administrator
 
QKShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Runthegun, USA
Posts: 19,191
QKShooter is a forum contributor
I'm using Speer Gold Dot JHP and I'm happy with it because it feeds very nicely.

When I finally shoot this all up I'll probably go for the BuffaloBore.
__________________

The lion does not turn around when a small dog barks.
QKShooter is offline  
Old February 11th, 2008, 04:21 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Over here
Posts: 246
Whyveear
That's all you want it to do is feed nicely? Then why spend the extra money for Gold Dots?
Whyveear is offline  
Old February 11th, 2008, 05:18 AM   #10
Assistant Administrator
 
QKShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Runthegun, USA
Posts: 19,191
QKShooter is a forum contributor
Primarily Yes.
Because I usually carry a Walther PPK/S which is really not noted for the vast number of different ammo and bullet nose configurations that it will feed reliably 100% the time.
If my Walther won't feed it then I don't need it.
Hey...I'm a poet and don't even know it.

Actually, there are other reasons.
One being that Gold Dot (brand) is what my local LEOs carry in their duty firearms and that is one less potential court room hassle out of the way.
I also carry Gold Dot in .45 and I'm impressed with Gold Dot ammunition quality in general. Speer QC is incredible. The Nickel plate also adds some lubricity that cuts down on the friction in feeding in my Walther. Every little bit helps.

Also the Speer is decently hot. The BuffaloBore is a bit hotter.
Because I don't have a ton of faith in the .380 (in the first place) so I'm betting my bones on shot placement and head shots (by preference) if possible.
I am decently satisfied that the Gold Dot will break through front facial bone if I do my part.
That is not to say that other ammo will not but, for the above mentioned reasons I'm comfortable with the Gold Dot.
__________________

The lion does not turn around when a small dog barks.
QKShooter is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008