Go Back   DefensiveCarry Concealed Carry Forum > Concealed Carry Discussion > Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Donations DefensiveCarry Store DefensiveCarry Gallery USGO Gallery Related Links Forum Help & Extras

Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics Discussion of defensive and concealed carry ammunition, ballisitics and reloading.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 12th, 2008, 09:14 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
ppkheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,041
ppkheat is a forum contributor
Yes it did. We studied and compared the .45 vs 9mm strike very carefully. The 9mm caused a bit more damage and impression. Feeling behind the impact points, the 9mm left a noticeable ding in the cast, it actually bulged it back maybe 1/16" from flat, at about 3" diameter. The .45 didn't push it back at all in the same manner.

This was only a one-shot-of-each-caliber comparison. To be more conclusive I'd have to shoot this test multiple times to see if a pattern emerges.

If and when I get the chance, I'll try to repeat it and see if that pattern does emerge. Provided I have enough undamaged tub left?
__________________
Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
ppkheat is online now  
Old February 12th, 2008, 09:22 AM   #12
Moderator
 
CopperKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Spokane area, WA
Posts: 4,360
CopperKnight is a forum contributor
Very good. Sounds like a lot of fun. At least the son-in-law was smart enough to stay behind the gun.
__________________
Being happy doesn't mean everything's perfect, but that you've decided to see beyond the imperfections.

The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD
CopperKnight is offline  
Old February 12th, 2008, 10:03 AM   #13
Senior Moderator
 
Tangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 5,438
Tangle is a forum contributor
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppkheat View Post
Yes it did. We studied and compared the .45 vs 9mm strike very carefully. The 9mm caused a bit more damage and impression. Feeling behind the impact points, the 9mm left a noticeable ding in the cast, it actually bulged it back maybe 1/16" from flat, at about 3" diameter. The .45 didn't push it back at all in the same manner.

This was only a one-shot-of-each-caliber comparison. To be more conclusive I'd have to shoot this test multiple times to see if a pattern emerges.

If and when I get the chance, I'll try to repeat it and see if that pattern does emerge. Provided I have enough undamaged tub left?
I hear ya on the one shot thing. My instructor at Blackwater said that in all the penetration tests and demos he'd seen since he'd been at Blackwater, the 9mm was unsurpassed in penetration for the major handgun rounds, i.e. 9mm .357 sig, .40, .45ACP.

So I'm really curious to see the results if you have enough tub left to do some more tests!
__________________
"Plans fail, things fail, people fail; but, fear never fails - it must be defeated." - by Tangle, a long time ago.
Tangle is offline  
Old February 12th, 2008, 10:14 AM   #14
Moderator
 
pgrass101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,753
pgrass101 is a forum contributor
I heard that 9mm FMJ is second in penertration to 7.62x25 of all major combat loads
__________________
Noli nothis permittere te terere

If I got .01 cents for every $1 in $700 billion I would have $70 million!!!!
pgrass101 is offline  
Old February 12th, 2008, 12:14 PM   #15
Member
 
jackdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dover,tn
Posts: 222
jackdog
Nice pics good post
__________________
Jack dog
jackdog is offline  
Old February 12th, 2008, 12:33 PM   #16
VIP Member
 
Supertac45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan's U.P.
Posts: 2,860
Supertac45 is a forum contributor
I know AP does a job of destroying cast iron.
__________________
Les Baer 45
Sig Man
N.R.A. Patron Life Member
M.C.R.G.O.
Supertac45 is offline  
Old February 12th, 2008, 12:34 PM   #17
VIP Member
 
PatrioticRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rigby, Idaho
Posts: 2,972
PatrioticRick is a forum contributor
Good read and good pics. 9mm & 45acp like to see more on that.
__________________
"A Taxpayer voting for Barack Obama,
is like a Chicken voting for Colonel Sanders"


USN/USAF Retired/Desert Shield/Desert Storm
DAV Life Member
NRA Life Member
PatrioticRick is offline  
Old February 12th, 2008, 09:01 PM   #18
nn
VIP Member
 
nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 4,126
nn is a forum contributor
Sounded like fun.
Are you starting the PPKHEAT of truth?
nn is offline  
Old February 13th, 2008, 12:58 PM   #19
Lead Moderator
 
dr_cmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 7,350
dr_cmg is a forum contributor
I would like to see what .357SIG and 10mm would do. I wonder if the porcelain coating is helping the tub to withstand the shots. I don't know how the porcelain is applied, but doesn't the surface it is put on have to be prepared. In the two tubs we have (neither is double wall) the outside appears to have been left in the rough, but the inside where the porcelain is looks like it was smoothed. This is real apparent around the holes for faucets, etc. Isn't the porcelain coating fired after being placed on the cast iron? If so, does this act as a heat treating of the iron and does the bonding of the porcelain increase the strength of the iron?

Just wondering why the tub doesn't act like other cast iron.
__________________
George

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein
dr_cmg is offline  
Old February 13th, 2008, 01:11 PM   #20
Assistant Administrator
 
P95Carry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South West PA
Posts: 25,341
P95Carry is a forum contributor
George ... AFAIK the process of enamelling will not change the cast iron's metallurgical properties -- by its very nature it will always be brittle and I'd not think the thin layer of glass would significantly ''strengthen'' the whole thing - not anyways when it comes to localized impact.

The one thing which I see as a variable is the presence of voids - a variable depending on the nature of the iron's original inclusions (how ''clean") .... and then the quaility of the casting process.

Good cast iron would probably take more punishment than poor examples - where size and quantity of voids could embrittle it further ... enabling major stress lines.
__________________
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


If a BG dies as the result of pointing a gun at me, then he has merely succumbed to an occupational hazard of being a thug
P95Carry is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Hosted ByTranquil Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright DefensiveCarry.com © 2004-2008